Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 42(2): 508-514, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32140916

RESUMO

Objective To investigate the association between the medication exposure, measured by the polypharmacy/excessive polypharmacy and the anticholinergic and/or sedative drug exposure, on frailty status among French older community-dwelling patients. Setting day-care unit in France (Lyon), with retrospective data from July, 2017 to March, 2018. Method This monocentric cross-sectional study included community-dwelling patients aged 65 years and over and admitted at the day-care unit for a geriatric evaluation. Frailty was assessed according to the frailty phenotype, described by Fried et al. Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were defined as the concomitant use of 5-9 and 10 or more drugs, respectively. The cumulative anticholinergic and sedative exposure was measured using the drug burden index (DBI). The DBI score was presented in 4 differentiated scores: a null score (DBI = 0), a combined score (anticholinergic and sedative score), an anticholinergic score, and a sedative score. The association between medication and frailty was assessed by logistic regression models controlled for multiple potential confounders. Main outcome measure Association between medication exposure (polypharmacy, anticholinergic and sedative exposure) and frailty. Results In this study, 403 patients were included: 44.7% were frail and 40.7% were pre-frail. Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy affected 44.7% and 17.1% of the population respectively. The mean DBI was 0.33 ± 0.43, with 16.4% of patients with only sedative exposure, 9.7% with only anticholinergic exposure and 33.0% with both exposures. After adjustment, polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were associated with frailty with adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 2.18 (1.03-4.22) and 2.72 (1.01-7.37) respectively. The cumulative exposure to anticholinergic and sedative drugs (combined score) was significantly associated to an increased risk for frailty with adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 3.54 (1.47-8.57). Conclusion The study showed that polypharmacy and cumulative anticholinergic and sedative exposure are associated with frailty. Further research should address the potential benefit of collaborative medication review for preventing medication-associated frailty.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Idoso Fragilizado , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Vida Independente/tendências , Polimedicação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado/psicologia , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Fragilidade/tratamento farmacológico , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Vida Independente/psicologia , Masculino
2.
Nucl Med Commun ; 39(9): 865-869, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29975214

RESUMO

Fractionated elution consists in collecting the fractions of an eluate with the highest radioactive concentration. It may be useful to meet the requirements of a subset of clinical radiopharmacy procedures. This study aims to describe and evaluate straightforward procedures allowing to readily perform fractionated elution on dry and wet columns Mo/Tc generators by using calibrated vials. The main objectives of this study consisted in determining the relationship between eluate volume and elution yield using different vials calibration and assessing repeatability of the procedure. Elution vials were calibrated to obtain different eluate volumes by addition of air for wet column generator (WCG) and subtraction of saline for dry column generator (DCG) (n≥5 for each calibration). The relationship between the eluate volume and the elution yield was determined by a regression model for both DCG and WCG. Then repeatability evaluation was performed using 3-ml vial calibration. Relationships between the eluate volume (V) and the elution yield (Y) for DCG and WCG were Y=57.551 ln(V)+10.526 and Y=50.256 ln(V)+17.597, respectively. For repeatability assessment (n=30 for DCG and n=31 for WCG), the median volume and the interquartile range for DCG and WCG were 2.98 ml (2.92-3.01) and 3.28 ml (2.71-3.40), respectively, and median (interquartile range) eluate yields were 84.73% (81.30-86.33) and 81.78% (78.91-85.20), respectively. The volume was significantly higher for WCG than DCG (P=0.036) and also significantly more variable (P<0.001). The elution yield was significantly lower for WCG than DCG (P=0.025), but no difference in variability between the two generators was found (P=0.874). Easy-to-handle fractionated elution methods are compatible with both DCG and WCG. Fractionation using calibrated vials exhibits a better reproducibility with DCG than WCG generators and represents the only proposed method so far to master fractionated elution with DCG.


Assuntos
Molibdênio/isolamento & purificação , Radioquímica/métodos , Radioisótopos/isolamento & purificação , Tecnécio/isolamento & purificação , Calibragem , Molibdênio/química , Radioisótopos/química , Tecnécio/química
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...