Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus patients with the BAFF antagonist "peptibody" blisibimod (AMG 623/A-623): results from randomized, double-blind phase 1a and phase 1b trials.

INTRODUCTION: Blisibimod is a potent B cell-activating factor (BAFF) antagonist that binds to both cell membrane-expressed and soluble BAFF. The goal of these first-in-human studies was to characterize the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of blisibimod in subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: SLE subjects with mild disease that was stable/inactive at baseline received either a single dose of blisibimod (0.1, 0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg subcutaneous [SC] or 1, 3, or 6 mg/kg intravenous [IV]) or placebo (phase 1a; N = 54), or four weekly doses of blisibimod (0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg SC or 6 mg/kg IV) or placebo (phase 1b; N = 63). Safety and tolerability measures were collected, and B cell subset measurements and pharmacokinetic analyses were performed. RESULTS: All subjects (93 % female; mean age 43.7 years) carried the diagnosis of SLE for ≥ 1 year. Single- and multiple-dose treatment with blisibimod produced a decrease in the number of naïve B cells (24-76 %) and a transient relative increase in the memory B cell compartment, with the greatest effect on IgD(-)CD27+; there were no notable changes in T cells or natural killer cells. With time, memory B cells reverted to baseline, leading to a calculated 30 % reduction in total B cells by approximately 160 days after the first dose. In both the single- and multiple-dosing SC cohorts, the pharmacokinetic profile indicated slow absorption, dose-proportional exposure from 0.3 through 3.0 mg/kg SC and 1 through 6 mg/kg IV, linear pharmacokinetics across the dose range of 1.0-6.0 mg/kg, and accumulation ratios ranging from 2.21 to 2.76. The relative increase in memory B cells was not associated with safety signals, and the incidence of adverse events, anti-blisibimod antibodies, and clinical laboratory abnormalities were comparable between blisibimod- and placebo-treated subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Blisibimod changed the constituency of the B cell pool and single and multiple doses of blisibimod exhibited approximate dose-proportional pharmacokinetics across the dose range 1.0-6.0 mg/kg. The safety and tolerability profile of blisibimod in SLE was comparable with that of placebo. These findings support further studies of blisibimod in SLE and other B cell-mediated diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02443506 . Registered 11 May 2015. NCT02411136 Registered 7 April 2015.

Ask the experts: method transfer.

As part of this themed issue, Bioanalysis invited a selection of researchers to express their views on method transfer in the bioanalytical field. The topics discussed include the main challenges in method transfer, the importance of communication and approaches for assessing the acceptability of transfers. Their responses provide a valuable insight into the considerations that need to be taken into account for successful method transfer.

Pharmacokinetics of palifermin administered as the standard dose and as a collapsed dose in patients with hematologic malignancies.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetic profile of palifermin after intravenous dosing with either a collapsed dose of 180 microg/kg/day for 1 day or a standard dose of 60 microg/kg/day for 3 days, before and after myeloablative chemoradiotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: University-affiliated hematology and oncology center. PATIENTS: Twenty-five adult patients with hematologic malignancies receiving myeloablative therapy; 13 were in the standard-dose group, and 12 were in the collapsed-dose group. INTERVENTION: Patients received total-body irradiation (study days -8 to -5), etoposide (day -4), cyclophosphamide (day -2), and PBPC transplantation (day 0). Standard-dose palifermin was administered on days -11, -10, -9, 0, 1, and 2; collapsed-dose palifermin was administered on days -11 and 0. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic assessment, presence of palifermin antibodies, and routine chemistry and hematology panels. Adverse events were documented daily. For both dosing groups, palifermin concentrations declined rapidly (>or= 98%) in the first 30 minutes and increased slightly between 1 and 4 hours after dosing, with a terminal decay phase. For standard-dose palifermin, mean values for area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) were within 15% between doses 1 and 3 and within 1% between doses 1 and 4. For collapsed-dose palifermin, mean AUC values and other pharmacokinetic parameters were within 2% between doses 1 and 2. Mean AUC on days -11 and 0 were approximately 4-fold higher for collapseddose palifermin than for standard-dose palifermin. Both dosing regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Our results were consistent with approximately dose-linear pharmacokinetics for the two dosing regimens, with no observed accumulation. A randomized, controlled study is warranted to assess the safety and efficacy of collapsed-dose palifermin, which may provide a more convenient administration schedule.