A systematic review of the incidence of and risk factors for postoperative atrial fibrillation following general surgery.

Atrial fibrillation is a common cardiac arrhythmia and can occur de novo following a surgical procedure. It is associated with increased inpatient and long-term mortality. There is limited evidence concerning new-onset atrial fibrillation following abdominal surgery. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of and risk factors for postoperative atrial fibrillation in the general surgical population. A systematic search of the Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane (CENTRAL) databases was conducted. Studies were included in the review if they reported cases of new-onset atrial fibrillation within 30 days of the index operation. Results were evaluated qualitatively due to substantial clinical heterogeneity. Incidence rates were pooled using a weighted random-effects meta-analysis model. A total of 835 records were initially identified, from which 32 full texts were retrieved. Following review, 13 studies were included that involved 52,959 patients, of whom 10.94% (95%CI 7.22-15.33) developed atrial fibrillation. Five studies of patients undergoing oesophagectomy (n = 376/1923) had a weighted average rate of 17.66% (95%CI 12.16-21.47), compared with 7.63% (95%CI 4.39-11.98) from eight studies of non-oesophageal surgery (n = 2927/51,036). Identified risk factors included: increasing age; history of cardiac disease; postoperative complications, particularly, sepsis, pneumonia and pleural effusions. New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation is common, and is more frequent after surgery involving the thorax. Future work should focus on stratifying risk to allow targeted prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation and other peri-operative complications.

Does the addition of active body warming to in-line intravenous fluid warming prevent maternal hypothermia during elective caesarean section? A randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia occurs frequently during elective caesarean section but perioperative active body warming is not widely used. There is a paucity of evidence of its use in the obstetric population, and no applicable guidelines. We set out to identify a superior active warming method for preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia. METHODS: Following ethical approval, 132 women presenting for uncomplicated elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were recruited. All participants received in-line intravenous fluid warming and were randomised to one of three parallel groups: no active body warming; forced air warming; and conduction mattress warming. The primary outcome was the difference in mean core temperature, measured on admission to the recovery room, between study groups. Core temperature and thermal comfort were measured perioperatively at 15-min intervals. Estimated blood loss, haemoglobin change, length of hospital stay and neonatal core temperature were also recorded. RESULTS: One-hundred-and-thirty-one women completed the study. There was no significant difference in mean core temperature on admission to the recovery room (36.6°C vs. 36.6°C vs. 36.6°C, η2=0.005, P=0.74). Maternal hypothermia was prevented in all groups with only 0.3% hypothermic at any of the temperature measurements (3/1016). There was no difference in mean neonatal core temperature (36.3°C vs. 36.3°C vs. 36.3°C, η2=0.003, P=0.82); however, 59.4% (76/128) of all neonates were hypothermic. CONCLUSION: In-line intravenous fluid warming is sufficient to prevent maternal hypothermia and maintain core temperature. The addition of active body warming conferred no added benefit.