In Vitro and In Vivo Investigation of Potential for Complex CYP3A Interaction for PF-00251802 (Dagrocorat), a Novel Dissociated Agonist of the Glucocorticoid Receptor.

The dissociated agonists of the glucocorticoid receptor are a novel class of agents in clinical development for rheumatoid arthritis. PF-04171327 (fosdagrocorat) is a phosphate ester prodrug of PF-00251802 (dagrocorat), a selective high-affinity partial agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor, which is further metabolized to PF-04015475. This study evaluated the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of PF-00251802 and PF-04015475 in vitro and used model-based prediction approaches to estimate clinical impact. PF-00251802 is a reversible inhibitor of several CYPs, but modeling has suggested no clinically relevant interaction. PF-00251802 and PF-04015475 are time-dependent inhibitors and inducers of CYP3A in vitro; PF-00251802 is also a time-dependent inhibitor of CYP2D6. Model-based prediction suggested the potential for weak inhibition of CYP3A in vivo. A clinical DDI study was conducted with midazolam, a sensitive CYP3A substrate. A phase 1 open-label, multiple-dose study evaluated the effect of PF-04171327 on midazolam pharmacokinetics and safety in 12 healthy volunteers. Administration of midazolam alone or concomitantly with PF-04171327 resulted in equivalent pharmacokinetic profiles (AUCinf , 21.17 vs 20.28 ng·h/mL, respectively), indicating that PF-04171327 had no net effect on CYP3A activity in vivo. These findings support the further development of PF-00251802 and PF-04171327 as potential treatments for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (NCT00987038).

Systematic review and meta-analysis of serious infections with tofacitinib and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Tofacitinib modulates the signaling of cytokines that are integral to lymphocyte activation, proliferation, and function. Thus, tofacitinib therapy may result in suppression of multiple elements of the immune response. Serious infections have been reported in tofacitinib RA trials. However, limited head-to-head comparator data were available within the tofacitinib RA development program to directly compare rates of serious infections with tofacitinib relative to biologic agents, and specifically adalimumab (employed as an active control agent in two randomized controlled trials of tofacitinib). METHODS: A systematic literature search of data from interventional randomized controlled trials and long-term extension studies with biologics in RA was carried out. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) consensus was followed for reporting results of the review and meta-analysis. Incidence rates (unique patients with events/100 patient-years) for each therapy were estimated based on data from randomized controlled trials and long-term extension studies using a random-effects model. Relative and absolute risk comparisons versus placebo used Mantel-Haenszel methods. RESULTS: The search produced 657 hits. In total, 66 randomized controlled trials and 22 long-term extension studies met the selection criteria. Estimated incidence rates (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were 3.04 (2.49, 3.72), 3.72 (2.99, 4.62), 5.45 (4.26, 6.96), and 4.90 (4.41, 5.44), respectively. Incidence rates (95% CIs) for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily (BID) in phase 3 trials were 3.02 (2.25, 4.05) and 3.00 (2.24, 4.02), respectively. Corresponding incidence rates in long-term extension studies were 2.50 (2.05, 3.04) and 3.19 (2.74, 3.72). The risk ratios (95% CIs) versus placebo for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID were 2.21 (0.60, 8.14) and 2.02 (0.56, 7.28), respectively. Risk differences (95% CIs) versus placebo for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID were 0.38% (-0.24%, 0.99%) and 0.40% (-0.22%, 1.02%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In interventional studies, the risk of serious infections with tofacitinib is comparable to published rates for biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severely active RA.

A randomized, open-label 3-way crossover study to investigate the relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of crushed sildenafil 20 mg tablets mixed with apple sauce, extemporaneously prepared suspension (EP), and intact sildenafil 20 mg tablets in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions.

The relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of 20-mg doses of a pediatric formulation of sildenafil extemporaneous preparation suspension (EP; 10 mg/mL), the sildenafil 20-mg intact tablet and the crushed sildenafil 20-mg tablet mixed with apple sauce were assessed in a single-dose, randomized, open-label, 3-way crossover study with 18 healthy adult volunteers. Blood samples were collected at predefined times and analyzed for sildenafil plasma concentrations. Natural log-transformed sildenafil pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax , AUClast , and AUCinf ) were used to estimate relative bioavailability and construct 90% confidence intervals (CI) using a mixed-effects model. Bioequivalence was concluded among the three formulations with one exception, in which the EP suspension showed a 15% decrease in Cmax with a lower 90% CI of 76% compared with the intact tablet. The 15% decrease in sildenafil Cmax is not considered to be clinically relevant. Therefore, the EP suspension is considered to be an appropriate pediatric formulation. All 3 formulations were well tolerated in healthy adult volunteers.

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of tofacitinib in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor. The objective of this phase 1, open-label study was to characterize the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of tofacitinib in 12 healthy, adult Chinese volunteers. Eligible subjects received oral tofacitinib 10 mg once daily on days 1 and 6 and twice daily on days 2-5. Blood samples were collected on day 1 predose and over 24 hours postdose (day 2 predose), predose on days 3-6, and over 12 hours postdose on day 6. PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Mean concentration-time profiles for days 1 and 6 were similar, with median time to peak concentration of 0.5 hours on both days. Plasma concentrations declined rapidly following attainment of peak concentrations, with a mean terminal half-life of 3.3 hours on day 1 (single dose) and 2.5 hours on day 6 (multiple dose). No accumulation in plasma occurred with twice-daily administration: accumulation ratio of 1.04. The rapid absorption, elimination, and systemic exposures (peak and area under the concentration-time curve) observed in healthy Chinese volunteers in this study are similar to those previously reported in white subjects.

A phase I open-label study to investigate the potential drug-drug interaction between single-dose dacomitinib and steady-state paroxetine in healthy volunteers.

Dacomitinib is currently in development for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Formation of the major circulating metabolite (PF-05199265) is mediated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and CYP2C9. This phase I, single fixed-sequence, two-period study evaluated the effect of paroxetine, a CYP2D6 inactivator, on dacomitinib pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers who were extensive CYP2D6 metabolizers. Subjects received a single 45-mg dacomitinib dose alone and in combination with paroxetine (30 mg/day for 10 consecutive days, with dacomitinib administered on day 4) at steady-state levels. Blood samples were collected through 240 hours post-dacomitinib dosing. Dacomitinib exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity; AUCinf) increased 37%; however a reduction in PF-05199265 AUCinf of approximately 90% was observed during the paroxetine treatment period. The maximum concentration of dacomitinib changed minimally. Adverse events reported with single-dose dacomitinib administered alone or in the presence of steady-state levels of paroxetine were mostly mild, and no serious adverse events were reported. While paroxetine significantly inhibited CYP2D6-mediated metabolism of a single dose of dacomitinib, the modest effect on dacomitinib exposure is unlikely to be clinically relevant when dacomitinib is given daily. Dose adjustment of dacomitinib may therefore not be required upon coadministration with a CYP2D6 inhibitor.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of maraviroc in HIV-negative subjects with impaired renal function.

PURPOSE: This open-label, nonrandomized, parallel-group study was conducted to explore the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of maraviroc in renally impaired subjects. METHODS: Subjects with normal renal function; mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment; or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (n = 6 per group) were enrolled. Subjects with normal function (period 1), severe impairment, and ESRD received a single 300 mg dose of maraviroc. Subjects with normal function (period 2), mild impairment, and moderate impairment received 150 mg for 7 days at adjusted intervals of twice daily, once daily, and every 48 hours, respectively, with saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/r). Maraviroc was quantified in plasma, urine, and dialysate by tandem high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: With SQV/r, geometric mean steady-state maraviroc area under the plasma concentration-time curve for the dosing interval (AUCtau) was 5,341 (coefficient of variation [CV], 27%), 8,119 (35%), and 6,193 (27%) h•ng/mL, in normal function, mild, and moderate impairment groups, respectively. Without SQV/r, 2% to 3% of the maraviroc dose was recovered in urine versus 15% to 25% of steady-state dose when given with SQV/r. Moderate to high intersubject variability in exposure was noted. AUC from zero to infinity (AUCinf) was similar to historical single-dose data in subjects with ESRD: low in those with normal function, and high in those with severe impairment. Dialysis did not influence maraviroc exposure. Maraviroc was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that no dosing interval adjustments are required in subjects with renal impairment when maraviroc is administered alone. However, maraviroc dosing interval adjustment is warranted in renally impaired patients receiving potent CYP3A4 inhibitors. Reference to local prescribing information is recommended, because dose recommendations in renally impaired patients may differ between regions.

Acute passive cigarette smoke exposure and inhaled human insulin (Exubera) pharmacokinetics.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Active cigarette smoking is associated with increased permeability of the pulmonary alveolar epithelium, resulting in faster absorption of inhaled drugs such as Exubera (EXU). Absorption of EXU is increased approximately twice to four times as much in chronic smokers compared with nonsmokers. The rate of clearance of radioaerosols such as technetium-labelled diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid is decreased in response to passive smoke exposure. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Passive smoke exposure causes a decrease in lung permeability, an effect opposite to that of active smoking. Acute passive smoke exposure results in a decrease in EXU bioavailability and does not create a risk of hypoglycaemia. These results are consistent with previous studies of radioaerosol lung clearance. AIMS Relative to nonsmokers, the bioavailability of inhaled human insulin (Exubera(R); EXU) is markedly increased in chronic smokers. The pharmacokinetics of EXU following passive cigarette smoke exposure is unknown. METHODS In an open-label, crossover study, healthy nonsmoking volunteers received two treatments in randomized sequence separated by a 2-week wash-out: (i) EXU 3 mg with no passive smoke exposure and (ii) EXU 3 mg after passive smoke exposure (atmospheric nicotine levels 75-125 mug m(-3)) for 2 h. Blood samples were obtained at prespecified times up to 6 h after EXU administration. RESULTS: Twenty-seven subjects completed both study periods. Mean plasma insulin AUC(0-360) decreased by 17% [ratio 83%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 68.8, 99.5] and mean C(max) by 29% (ratio 71%, 95% CI 59.8, 83.1) after passive cigarette smoke exposure. The median (range) t(max) was 60 min (20-120 min) and 75 min (20-360 min) in the EXU with no exposure and EXU passive exposure groups, respectively. EXU was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike active chronic smoking, acute passive cigarette smoke exposure modestly decreases EXU bioavailability and thus should not increase hypoglycaemia risk. These results are consistent with those from published literature involving technetium-labelled diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid and suggest that passive cigarette smoke exposure causes an acute decrease in lung permeability vs. active smoking, which causes an increase in permeability.