Modified Carpal Tunnel Release: A New Approach to Minimizing Pillar Pain.

INTRODUCTION: Pillar pain is a frequent postoperative complication of carpal tunnel release (CTR). The precise definition of pillar pain is lacking, but most authors describe it as diffuse aching pain and tenderness in the thenar and hypothenar area. The etiology of pillar pain is unclear. However, the most prevalent theory is the neurogenic theory, which attributes the pain to the damage of small nerve branches of palmar cutaneous branches of median nerve after surgical incision, with resulting entrapment of the nerves in the scar tissue at the incision site. We postulated that a main source of pillar pain is sensory neuromas along the incision site.In this article, we describe a simple modification of the standard CTR technique with intent to decrease neuroma formation and thus minimizing pillar pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study comparing the incidence and duration of pillar pain between patients who underwent standard CTR (SCTR, n = 53) versus the minimizing pillar pain CTR technique (n = 55). Based on duration of pillar pain, the groups were placed into 3 subgroups (<3, 3-6, and >6 months). Presence and duration of pillar pain in each group were recorded along with return to work (RTW), complications, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The SCTR group had a total of 17 patients with pillar pain (32.1%), 5 of which resolved within 3 months, 7 within 3 to 6 months, and 5 in more than 6 months. The group that underwent the minimizing pillar pain technique had a total of 4 patients with pillar pain (7.2%). Three resolved within 3 months, 1 resolved within 3 to 6 months, and there were no patients with pillar pain lasting more than 6 months. Average RTW time for minimization of pillar pain CTR (MPPCTR) was 34.9 days. Average RTW time for SCTR was 54.8 days. Satisfaction was higher among patients who underwent surgery with MPPCTR. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, we concluded that MPPCTR compared with SCTR had equal complication rate, however, significantly lower incidence and duration of pillar pain, higher rate of satisfaction, and earlier RTW.

Keloid and Hypertrophic Scar Formation, Prevention, and Management: Standard Review of Abnormal Scarring in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Keloid and hypertrophic scar formation after orthopaedic surgical closure is a complex issue. The nature and location of procedures maximize wound tension, leave foreign bodies, and diminish dermal supply, all potentiating keloid formation. There is little discussion regarding the pathophysiology and management of this recurrent problem in orthopaedic literature. Keloid formation is a fibroproliferative disorder resulting in extensive production of extracellular matrix and collagen, but prevention and treatment is poorly understood. Patient and surgical factors contributing to the development of this condition are discussed. The treatments include both medical and surgical therapies that work at a biologic level and attempt to produce a cosmetic and complication-free management strategy. Medical options that have been investigated include combinations of intralesional steroid therapy, laser therapy, and biologics. Preventive surgical closure and excision remain mainstays of treatment. Radiation therapy has also been used in refractory cases with mixed results. Despite medical therapies and surgical excision aimed at treating the resulting scar, recurrence rate is very high for all modalities that have been studied to this point. Future work is being done to better understand the pathophysiology leading to keloid and hypertrophic scar formation in an effort to find preventive methods as compared to treatment strategies.