[Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison]. / Prospektiv randomisierte Studie zum Vergleich von Misoprostol oral mit Dinoproston vaginal bei der Geburtseinleitung am Termin.

BACKGROUND: It was the objective of this study to compare the efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol with those of vaginal dinoprostone for the induction of labour at term. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2006 224 pregnant women were included in our prospective randomised clinical trial. All of them were admitted for induction of labor at term. Half of the patients received oral misoprostol, initially at a test dose of 25 microg, followed by 50 microg and 100 microg every 4 hours. The control group received 3 mg vaginal dinoprostone every 6 hours. Primary endpoints were time interval until delivery and mode of delivery as well as maternal and neonatal outcome, secondary endpoints were side effects and costs. RESULTS: In the dinoprostone group, the median time interval until delivery was 17.6 hours compared to 24.1 hours in the misoprostol group. Without the test dose, the difference was no longer significant. After dinoprostone induction, more patients had a vaginal delivery within 24 hours (n=60, 53.6%, vs. n=46, 41.1%). The frequencies of spontaneous deliveries and emergency Caesarean sections did not differ between the groups. The rate of vacuum extractions was higher in the misoprostol group (23 vs. 11, i. e. 20.5 vs. 9.8%, p<0.05). With regard to side effects there was no significant difference. No case of hyperstimulation was documented. CONCLUSION: Oral misoprostol is effective and safe for induction of labour at term. In addition, it is much cheaper and independent of storage conditions. At the doses and with the administration intervals used in this study, dinoprostone was slightly more effective than misoprostol.

Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene polymorphism is associated with increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Different studies indicate that immunological components play a key role in the development of cancer. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is known to be critically involved in ovarian carcinogenesis and in other solid tumors. Therefore, we investigated the possible influence of the polymorphism of the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1 RA) genes on the development of ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study we analyzed the polymorphism of the IL-1 RA gene in 108 women with ovarian cancer compared with 112 patients with benign gynecological diseases. Genomic DNA fragments were amplified by PCR. RESULTS: The distribution of genotype frequencies was significantly different between the study and control group with respect to allele 1/2 heterozygotes (32.4% versus 15.2%; P = 0.004). Patients who were heterozygous at allele 2 for IL-1 RA (IL-RA 1/2) had a significantly higher risk of ovarian cancer with a calculated odds ratio of 2.7 (95% confidence interval 1.4-5.2). There were no differences between IL-1 RA 1/2 polymorphism and all other alleles in tumor stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics), histological type, grading, postoperative tumor volume, volume of ascites, recurrence status or age. CONCLUSIONS: The allele 2 polymorphism of the IL-1 RA gene seems to play a role in the occurrence of ovarian cancer and should be investigated for screening and risk evaluation.