Bi-level Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) for Preterm Infants with Birth Weight Less Than 1500 g and Respiratory Distress Syndrome Following INSURE Treatment: A Two-center Randomized Controlled Trial.

The present study aimed to examine the effectiveness of bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm infants with birth weight less than 1500 g and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) following intubation-surfactant-extubation (INSURE) treatment. A two-center randomized control trial was performed. The primary outcome was the reintubation rate of infants within 72 h of age after INSURE. Secondary outcomes included bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and incidences of adverse events. Lung function at one year of corrected age was also compared between the two groups. There were 140 cases in the CPAP group and 144 in the BiPAP group. After INSURE, the reintubation rates of infants within 72 h of age were 15% and 11.1% in the CPAP group and the BiPAP group, respectively (P>0.05). Neonates in the BiPAP group was on positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy three days less than in the CPAP group (12.6 d and 15.3 d, respectively, P<0.05), and on oxygen six days less than in the CPAP group (20.6 d and 26.9 d, respectively, P<0.05). Other outcomes such as BPD, NEC, ROP and feeding intolerance were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no difference in lung function at one year of age between the two groups (P>0.05). In conclusion, after INSURE, the reintubation rate of infants within 72 h of age was comparable between the BiPAP group and the CPAP group. BiPAP was superior to CPAP in terms of shorter durations (days) on PAP support and oxygen supplementation. There were no differences in the incidences of BPD and ROP, and lung function at one year of age between the two ventilation methods.

[Set up drug lymphocyte stimulation test (3H-TdR) and observe its application in drug-induced liver injury].

OBJECTIVE: To set up the drug lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST), as a diagnosis means for DILI which was immunity idiosyncrasy, improve the Diagnosis, level of DILI. METHOD: For the 59 patients who diagnosed as DILI, we separated their PBMC, exploring to the suspicious drug which caused DILI, then use the methods 3H-TdR to test, according to the mixed degree to clear the PBMC count which specific activated by drug.We also set up drug group, negative control and Positive control at the same time. Preliminary experiments was including the best dose of PHA and the best concentration of the drug. We set up 40 healthy group in our experiments as a control, and explore them on the same drug every time. We test the two groups at the same time. We handled the results use t-test. RESULTS: The methods 3H-TdR could be exactly reflect the PBMC's proliferation degree nearly the same when they were be stimulation by PHA or the sensitive drug. When the DILI patients were explore to the suspicious drug, their stimulation index (SI) Obviously higher than 1.8. Form this test, there were 28 in 59 patients of DILI's group were positive (47.46%), SI was from 1.9 to 43.08, the average was 22.49, the healthy group SI was lower than 1.8, the SI of DILI's group was significantly higher than healthy group (5.78+/-0.75/1.16+/-0.25, P less than 0.05). Our test suggested DLST has Higher specificity (94.92%) and sensitivity (47.46%). CONCLUSION: DLST was significance for the patients who diagnosed as immunity idiosyncrasy's DILI, it's reflected these patients' Proliferation of PBMC when explored to the suspicious drug for the second time.