Ten existing osteoporosis prediction tools for the successful application of National Health Insurance-reimbursed anti-osteoporosis medications in long-term care residents in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Osteoporotic fracture introduce enormous societal and economic burden, especially for long-term care residents (LTCRs). Although osteoporosis prevention for LTCRs is urgently needed, obstacles such as frail status and inconvenient hospital visits hurdled them from necessary examinations and diagnoses. We aimed to test 10 existing osteoporosis screening tools (OSTs), which can be easily used in institutions and serve as a prediction, for accurately determining the outcome of a Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI)-reimbursed anti-osteoporosis medications (AOMs) application for LTCRs. METHODS: This prospective analysis recruited 444 patients from LTC institutions between October 2018 and November 2019. Predictions of whether the NHI-reimbursed AOMs criteria was met were tested for 10 OSTs. The results of OSTs categorized into self-reported or validated based on previous fracture history were self-reported by LTCRs or validated by imaging data and medical records, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve and the optimal cut-off points for LTCRs based on Youden's index were explored. RESULTS: Overall, the validated OSTs had a higher positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) summation than the corresponding reported OSTs. The validated FRAX-Major was the best OST (PPV = 63.6%, NPV = 82.4% for the male group and, PPV = 78.8%, NPV = 90.0% for the female group). After applying the optimum cut-off derived from Youden's index, the validated FRAX-Major (PPV = 75.4%, NPV = 92.0%)) remained performed best for men. In female population, validated FRAX-Major (PPV = 87.2%, NPV = 84.1%) and validated osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA; PPV = 96.1%, NPV = 79.7%)) both provided good prediction results. CONCLUSION: FRAX-Major and OPERA have better prediction ability for LTCRs to acquire NHI-reimbursed AOMs. The validated fracture history and adjusted cut-off points could prominently increase the PPV during prediction.

Factors influencing terminal cancer patients' autonomous DNR decision: a longitudinal statutory document and clinical database study.

OBJECTIVE: Much of our knowledge of patient autonomy of DNR (do-not-resuscitate) is derived from the cross-sectional questionnaire surveys. Using signatures on statutory documents and medical records, we analyzed longitudinal data to understand the fact of terminal cancer patients' autonomous DNR decision-making in Taiwan. METHODS: Using the medical information system database of one public medical center in Taiwan, we identified hospitalized cancer patients who died between Jan. 2017 and Dec. 2018, collected their demographic and clinical course data and records of their statutory DNR document types, letter of intent (DNR-LOI) signed by the patient personally and the consent form signed by their close relatives. RESULTS: We identified 1,338 signed DNR documents, 754 (56.35%) being DNR-LOI. Many patients had the first DNR order within their last week of life (40.81%). Signing the DNR-LOI was positively associated with being under the care of a family medicine physician prior to death at last hospitalization and having hospice palliative care and negatively associated with patient age ≥ 65 years, no formal education, having ≥ 3 children, having the first DNR order to death ≤ 29 days, and the last admission in an intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of terminal cancer patients did not sign DNR documents by themselves. It indicates they may not know their actual terminal conditions and lose the last chance to grasp time to express their life values and wishes. Medical staff involving cancer patient care may need further education on the legal and ethical issues revolving around patient autonomy and training on communicating end-of-life options with the patients. We suggest proactively discussing DNR decision issues with terminal cancer patients no later than when their estimated survival is close to 1 month.

Using a simple preliminary screening tool to explore related factors of osteoporosis in the elderly of southern Taiwan.

ABSTRACT: The aims of this study were to use a simple screening tool to explore related factors with osteoporosis in the elderly in the community of southern Taiwan.This was an observational cross-sectional study using Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asia (OSTA), Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Taiwanese (OSTAi), and the basic demographic information to identify osteoporosis in the participants. This study collected data from 200 participants aged 65 and above and living in southern Taiwan.The prevalence of osteoporosis among elders in the community was 30.5% (OSTA) and 58.0% (OSTAi), respectively. The prevalence of osteoporosis determined by OSTA and OSTAi in female (33.1% and 63.1%, respectively.) was higher than in male (25.7% and 48.6%, respectively.). Risk factors such as gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) were significantly associated with osteoporosis (P < .001). Using OSTA and OSTAi to assess the risk for osteoporosis, for every 1 year of age increase, the odds ratio (OR) value of osteoporosis increased by 1.84 and 1.50 times, respectively (P < .001); for every 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI, the OR of osteoporosis decreases by 0.36 and 0.44 times, respectively. The results of this study can be used a simple tool of OSTA and OSTAi self-examination to screen potential high-risk groups for osteoporosis in the community.OSTA and OSTAi can screen for possible high-risk groups early and without invasive examinations and self-examination tools in a hospital. Low BMI poses higher risks of osteoporosis for the elderly, so increasing functional ability, improving muscle strength, maintaining exercise habits and keeping proper weight could prevent osteoporosis in the seniors.

A national study on long-term osteoporosis therapy and risk of recurrent fractures in patients with hip fracture.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the impact of osteoporosis (OP) medication persistence on subsequent fractures and all-cause mortality in patients with hip fracture. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients aged ≥ 40 years with fragility hip fracture from the Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. OP medication persistence was categorized as yes (≥ 12 months) or no (< 12 months). A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the association between OP medication persistence and recurrent fractures (including hip, vertebral, and upper and lower limb fractures) and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 946 patients were included in the study (86.5 % of them aged ≥ 65 years) and 210 patients persistently received OP medications. Persistent OP medication use was associated with lower fracture risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.64; 95 % CI = 0.41-0.99; P = .043) in the follow-up period. The strongest predictors for all-cause mortality were age ≥ 80 years (HR = 5.68, 95 % CI = 1.36-23.64, P = .017), male sex (HR = 1.55; 95 % CI = 1.18-2.03; P = .002), and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 3 (aHR = 1.56; 95 % CI = 1.07-2.27; P = .022). Kaplan-Meier curves showed a lower cumulative incidence of recurrent fractures in the persistent group than that in the non-persistent group (P = .028). CONCLUSION: Persistent OP medication use was associated with a lower risk of recurrent fractures but not with mortality in patients with hip fracture.

Long-term smoking cessation rates in elderly versus other adult smokers: A 3-year follow-up study in Taiwan.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation improves life expectancy at any age. There is some evidence that elderly smokers have at least as good a chance of successfully stopping as other smokers but direct comparisons with long-term follow up are rare. This study aimed to compare success rates up to 3 years in smokers aged 65+ versus other adult smokers with and without adjustment for a range of other smoker characteristics. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 1065 smokers who attended a stop-smoking clinic in Taiwan. Participants (896 < 65 years, 169 65+ years) were followed up by telephone 3, 6, 12 and 36 months after the initial quit date. Prolonged abstinence (abstinent at all follow-ups) and point prevalence abstinence (7 days prior to final follow up) were compared between 'elderly' participants aged 65+ years versus 'non-elderly' participants aged <65 years with and without adjustment for a range of baseline smoker characteristics (sex, educational level, previous quit attempts, cigarette dependence score). Non-responders were considered to be smoking. RESULTS: Prolonged 36-month abstinence rates were 20.1% (N = 34) and 15.3% (N = 137) in the elderly and non-elderly participants respectively (p = 0.137). Point prevalence 36-month abstinence rates were 37.3% (N = 63) and 26.5% (N = 237) in the elderly and non-elderly participants respectively (p = 0.005). The odds ratios comparing elderly versus non-elderly abstinence rates after adjustment for baseline variables were 1.17 (95%CI = 0.75-1.83) and 1.52 (95%CI = 1.05-2.20) for prolonged abstinence and point prevalence abstinence respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly smokers attending smoker clinics in Taiwan appear to be at least as likely to achieve long-term abstinence as other adult smokers.