Enhanced recovery after surgery day surgery for MAKO® robotic-arm assisted TKA; better outcome for patients, improved efficiency for hospitals.

Introduction: Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) was designed to improve implant position accuracy by providing surgeons with real-time intra-operative data to tailor the operation to the patient. Proponents of robotic-assisted TKA believe that this translates into meaningful improvements in outcomes. However, there are concerns that the longer surgical duration associated with robotic-assisted TKA leads to longer length of stay (LOS). In this study, the authors investigated the outcome of MAKO® Robotic-arm Assisted TKA combined with ERAS protocol to assess its effect on LOS and short-term outcomes. Methods: All patients who had undergone unilateral MAKO® ERAS Day Surgery TKA from August 2020 to July 2021 were prospectively followed up and matched to patients who underwent conventional ERAS Day Surgery TKA in the same time period. Factors such as surgical duration, LOS, immediate reduction in pain, 30-days complications, and 6-month PROMs and knee ROM were compared between the two groups. Results: 42 patients underwent MAKO® ERAS Day surgery TKA and were matched to 42 patients who underwent conventional ERAS Day surgery TKA. The study found that despite the longer surgical duration, LOS was comparable between both groups (1.1 ± 0.9days in the MAKO® group vs 1.0 ± 0.3days in the conventional group, p = 0.755) with successful 24-hour discharge in 88.1 % of patients in the MAKO® group. The MAKO® group achieved significantly better ROM compared to the conventional group 6-months post operatively. Post-operative PROMs were comparable between both groups. Conclusion: ERAS Day Surgery protocol can significantly reduce the LOS of patient undergoing MAKO® Robotic-arm Assisted TKA, conferring cost savings and making it a valid option for patients.

Effect of Context Specificity on Response to the Shortened WOMAC Function Scale in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To determine, in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whether increasing context specificity of selected items of the shortened version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function (WOMAC-F) scale (ShortMAC-F) (1) enhanced the convergent validity of the ShortMAC-F with performance-based mobility measures (ii) affected mean scale score, structural validity, reliability, and interpretability. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of randomized clinical trial data. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing TKA (N=114). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The ShortMAC-F was modified by specifying the "ascending stairs" and "rising from sitting" items to enquire about difficulty in performing the tasks without reliance on compensatory strategies, whereas the modified "level walking" item enquired about difficulty in walking 400 m. Before and 12 weeks after TKA, patients completed the WOMAC-F questionnaire, modified ShortMAC-F questionnaire, knee pain scale questionnaire, sit-to-stand test, fast gait speed test, and stair climb test. Interpretability was evaluated by calculating anchor-based substantial clinical benefit estimates. RESULTS: The modified ShortMAC-F correlated significantly more strongly than ShortMAC-F or WOMAC-F with pooled performance measures (differences in correlation values, 0.12-0.14). Increasing item context specificity of the ShortMAC-F did not influence its psychometric properties of unidimensionality (comparative fit and Tucker-Lewis indices, >0.95; root mean square error of approximation, 0.05-0.08), reliability (Cronbach's α, 0.75-0.83), correlation with pain intensity (correlation values, 0.48-0.52), and substantial clinical benefit estimates (16 percentage points); however, it resulted in lower mean score (4.5-4.8 points lower). CONCLUSIONS: The modified ShortMAC-F showed sufficient measurement properties for clinical application, and it seemed more adept than WOMAC-F at correlating with performance-based measures in TKA.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in obese patients, poorer survivorship at 15 years.

Introduction: The preclusion of obese patients from unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increasingly been challenged. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on UKA at 15-year follow-up. Materials and methods: 169 unilateral UKA patients from 2003 to 2007 were followed-up prospectively for at least 15 years. 70 patients were left for analysis after accounting for patient demise, revision surgery and loss to follow-up. 48 of these patients (69%) were in the Control group (BMI <30 kg/m2) and 22 (31%) were in the Obese group (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Patients were assessed before and after operation using the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) component of the Short Form 12. Survivorship analysis was also performed. Results: Obese patients went through UKA at an earlier age than the non-obese patients (54.7 ± 4.7 years compared to 59.9 ± 7.8 years, p = 0.005). At 2, 10, and 15-year follow-up, both groups achieved clinically significant improvements in outcomes. There was no significant association found between obesity and outcome using multiple linear regression. While propensity matching found PCS improvement at 2 years to be greater in obese patients, no significant association between obesity and 15-year outcome was found. All 13 patients who required revision, underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The overall 15-year survivorship was 74.2% within the obese group and 92.4% within the control group. Conclusion: Compared to non-obese patients, obese patients had poorer 15-year survivorship with greater odds of requiring revision surgery. However, assuming implant survival, obese patients can expect a non-inferior outcome relative to their non-obese counterparts in all patient reported outcome measures 15 years after surgery.

Severe genu varus deformity does not affect enhanced recovery after surgery total knee arthroplasty outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been increasingly adopted in orthopaedic surgery. Although not an exclusion criterion, patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with preoperative severe varus deformity may be less likely to be enrolled for ERAS. This study aimed to compare the success of ERAS TKA between patients with severe preoperative varus deformities (≥ 15° varus) and the control group (< 15° varus to 14° valgus). Our secondary aim was to compare postoperative complications and functional outcomes between the two groups. MATERIALS & METHODS: 310 TKAs performed from August 2019 to February 2021 were analyzed with a follow-up of 6 months postoperatively. The primary outcome, ERAS TKA success, was defined as length of hospital stay of < 24 h. Other parameters included 30-day postoperative complications and clinical outcomes such as the original Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Knee Society Knee (KSKS) and Function Score (KSFS), Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS-P), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS). RESULTS: There were 119 patients in the severe deformity group and 191 patients in the control group. There were no significant differences in ERAS success between the severe deformity group and control group, with both groups achieving similarly high rates (> 90%) of ERAS success. There were also no differences in 30-day postoperative complications and 6-month postoperative clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe preoperative varus deformity undergoing ERAS TKA achieved high ERAS success rates (> 90%). Genu varum is not a contraindication for ERAS TKA.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces need for patient selection for day surgery total knee arthroplasty.

Introduction: This study explored the safety and efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) together with a Day-surgery protocol on some commonly used selection criteria for expedited discharge after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: ERAS Day surgery TKA performed between Aug 2020 to July 2021 were included in this study. Discharge within 24 h was considered passing protocol. Complications such as infection, re-admission, and re-operation within 30-days were recorded. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and outcome measures at 6-month post-operatively were analysed between those who were successfully discharged within 24 h and those with prolong admission. Results: A total of 342 patients were included in the study. 315 patients (92.1 %) were discharged within 24 h s. Inadequately controlled pain was the most common reason for delayed discharge (17.9 %). No statistically significant difference in gender, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Body Mass Index (BMI), and American Society of Anaesthesiologist Classification (ASA) were noted between patients who failed protocol and those who passed. Readmission rate within 30days was 2.6 %. Infection occurred in 5 cases, including 2 prosthetic joint infection (PJI) requiring debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), 2 surgical site infection treated with antibiotics, and 1 pneumonia. No 30-days complication occurred in patients who initially failed ERAS Day-surgery protocol. Binary logistic regression was statistically insignificant on effect of gender, age, CCI, BMI, and ASA on passing protocol or 30-days complications. Propensity score matching of patients with prolong stay of more than 24 h did not demonstrate any difference in 6-month outcome. Conclusion: Patient characteristics such as gender, age, CCI, BMI, and ASA did not influence successful completion of ERAS Day-surgery protocol. Even if patients were initially enrolled in ERAS Day-surgery protocol but failed to be discharged within 24 h, this did not predispose them to increased 30-days complication or poorer 6-month outcome. Level of evidence: III.

Enhanced recovery after day surgery total knee arthroplasty, the new standard of care: An Asian perspective.

BACKGROUND: This study describes the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with day-surgery protocol to assess the outcome of ERAS day surgery TKA compared with traditional ERAS inpatient TKA in terms of length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: Patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA from August 2020 to July 2021 were followed up. All TKAs were performed with the ERAS protocol. Patients who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria were offered day-surgery protocol: (1) ASA ≤ 3; (2) agreeable for discharge home. In addition, this day-surgery protocol comprised the following: (i) on-call physiotherapy review; (ii) home visit by physiotherapist at 1 week postoperative; (iii) home visit by nurse at 2 weeks postoperative. Day surgery was defined as discharge within 24 h. Patients were followed up for 6 months and PROMs, postoperative complications, and re-admissions recorded. RESULTS: A total of 738 patients were included (342 ERAS day surgery, 396 ERAS inpatient). 92.4% of patients in the day-surgery group were successfully discharged within 24 h, leading to a shorter mean LOS of 1.13 days compared with 4.12 days in the inpatient group (P < 0.005). Both groups achieved significant and comparable improvement in Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and Physical and Mental component of Short Form-36. Both groups had similar rate of 30-day readmission and complications. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent ERAS day surgery TKA achieved similar functional and quality of life improvement compared with ERAS inpatient TKA with no increased complication rate. ERAS day surgery TKA is safe and cost effective, and its use should be promoted.

Clinical Frailty Scale is a better predictor for adverse post-operative complications and functional outcomes than Modified Frailty Index and Charlson Comorbidity Index after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Studies have demonstrated correlations between frailty and comorbidity scores with adverse outcomes in total knee replacement (TKR). However, there is a lack of consensus on the most suitable pre-operative assessment tool. This study aims to compare Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Modified Frailty Index (MFI), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in predicting adverse post-operative complications and functional outcomes following a unilateral TKR. METHODS: In total, 811 unilateral TKR patients from a tertiary hospital were identified. Pre-operative variables were age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, CFS, MFI, and CCI. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to ascertain odd ratios of pre-operative variables on adverse post-operative complications (length of stay < LOS >, complications, ICU/HD admission, discharge location, 30-day readmission, 2-year reoperation). Multiple linear regression analyses were used to estimate the standardized effects of pre-operative variables on the Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: CFS is a strong predictor for LOS (OR 1.876, p < 0.001), complications (OR 1.83-4.97, p < 0.05), discharge location (OR 1.84, p < 0.001), and 2-year reoperation rate (OR 1.98, p < .001). ASA and MFI were predictors for ICU/HD admission (OR:4.04, p = 0.002; OR 1.58, p = 0.022, respectively). None of the scores was predictive for 30-day readmission. A higher CFS was associated with a worse outcome for 6-month KSS, 2-year KSS, 6-month OKS, 2-year OKS, and 6-month SF-36. CONCLUSION: CFS is a superior predictor for post-operative complications and functional outcomes than MFI and CCI in unilateral TKR patients. This suggests the importance of assessing pre-operative functional status when planning for TKR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, II.

Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Markov Decision Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) may improve clinical outcomes for patients who have end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee. However, the costs of rTKA are high, and there is a paucity of data evaluating the cost-effectiveness of rTKA. We aimed to analyze the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of rTKA relative to manual TKA. METHODS: A Markov decision analysis was performed using known parameters for costs, outcomes, implant survivorships, and mortalities. The cost-effectiveness of rTKA relative to manual TKA was assessed for end-stage knee osteoarthritis patients who had a mean age of 65 years (range, 27 to 94 years). The rTKA costs were calculated for a pay-per-use contract robot. RESULTS: Using the Markov Model with an annual case volume of 500 patients and a mean age of 65 years, the overall health gain per patient was 13.34 QALYs after rTKA and 13.31 QALYs after manual TKA. This resulted in an overall gain in QALYs of 0.03 for each patient undergoing an rTKA compared with manual TKA and an incremental cost of $128,526 Singapore Dollars per QALY. CONCLUSION: Robotic TKA is not a cost-effective alternative to conventional TKA using a pay-per-use contract robot.

Aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty outcomes were equivalent to patients' own pre-failure state but inferior to patients without revision.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to (1) longitudinally compare the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the same patients who underwent primary TKA and revision TKA, and (2) compared the results of these revision TKA with a matched cohort of well-functioning primary TKA. The hypothesis was revision TKA could result in equivalent outcomes to patients' own primary TKA or the primary TKA of patients who did not require revision. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of 123 patients who underwent primary TKA and subsequently aseptic revision TKA ("revised group"), were matched using nearest-neighbor method to 123 well-functioning primary TKA that did not require revision ("control group"). Preoperative (prior to primary TKA), at time of failure (prior to revision TKA), postoperative 6-month and 2-year PROMs included Knee Society scores (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) attainment was analyzed. Wilcoxon and McNemar's tests were used to compare outcomes within the revised group (primary vs revision), Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-Square test for the revised and control groups. RESULTS: The revised group had poorer KSS objective (p = 0.045), KSS functional (p < 0.001), OKS (p = 0.011) and SF-36 PCS (p < 0.001) at time of failure (prior to revision TKA), compared to their preoperative PROMs (prior to primary TKA). Revision TKA resulted in restoration of KSS objective, OKS and SF-36 PCS (NS) that were equivalent to their primary TKA, but poorer KSS functional (p < 0.050). Patients in the revised group had a lower proportion of MCID attainment in KSS objective (p = 0.014) and OKS (p < 0.001) at 2-year after primary TKA when compared to the control group. Revision TKA also led to poorer KSS objective, KSS functional and SF-36 PCS (p < 0.050) when compared to primary TKA of the control group. CONCLUSION: Outcomes following aseptic revision were equivalent to patients' own pre-failure state but inferior to patients with non-revised implants. An individualized approach toward goal setting and assessing adequacy of aseptic revision TKA can be adopted based on patients' pre-failure outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The patient acceptable symptom state for the knee society score, oxford knee score and short form-36 following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a target value on a patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) scale beyond which patients deem themselves to have attained an acceptable outcome. This study aimed to define the PASS thresholds for generic and knee-specific PROMs at 2 years after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: Prospectively collected data of 955 patients who underwent UKA for medial osteoarthritis at a single institution was reviewed. Patients were assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively using the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Function Score (KSFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS). Responses to an anchor question assessing patients' overall rating of treatment results were dichotomized and used to determine if PASS was achieved. PASS thresholds for each PROM were selected based on the Youden index on a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Sensitivity analyses were performed for different subgroups (by age, gender, BMI), baseline score tertiles and an alternate definition of PASS. RESULTS: In total, 92.7% reported their current state as acceptable. The areas under the curve (AUC) for ROCs were 0.72-0.83, except for the SF-36 PCS (AUC 0.64), indicating good discriminative accuracy of the other PROMs. PASS thresholds were 85.5 for KSKS, 77.5 for KSFS, 41.5 for OKS, 49.9 for SF-36 PCS and 54.6 for SF-36 MCS. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the thresholds were robust. Patients who attained a PASS were at least 4-5 times more likely to be satisfied and have expectations fulfilled. CONCLUSION: PASS thresholds can be used to define treatment success in future outcome studies. At the individual level, they provide clinically relevant benchmarks for surgeons when assessing postoperative recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Adductor Canal Block Does not Confer Better Immediate Postoperative Pain Relief after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The adductor canal block (ACB) is a useful adjunct to control postoperative pain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of our study was to compare postoperative day 1 (POD1) pain scores, ambulation distance, range of motion, active straight leg raise (SLR), and length of stay (LOS) in TKA patients receiving no ACB (NACB), ACB by surgeon (ACBS), or ACB by anesthetist (ACBA). After obtaining institutional ethics approval, a retrospective review of 135 patients who underwent TKA between September 2020 and March 2021 was performed. All patients underwent TKA by the same surgeon and received the same standardized postoperative rehabilitation. Operating theater time was shortest in the NACB group with 129.3 ± 23.1 minutes compared with 152.4 ± 31.6 minutes in ACBA and 139.2 ± 29.4 minutes in ABCS (p = 0.001). For the POD1 pain score after therapy, the NACB group scored 4.9 ± 3.1 compared with 3.5 ± 2.2 and 3.9 ± 1.8 scored by the ACBA and ACBS groups, respectively (p = 0.302). The mean POD1 ambulation distance was 21.1 ± 15.2 m in the NACB group compared with 15.4 ± 1.3 and 17.8 ± 13.2 m in the ACBA and ACBS groups (all p > 0.05), respectively. There were no significant differences in the median LOS between three groups or ability to perform active SLR (all p > 0.05). Our study found no significant differences when comparing ACBS and ACBA by POD1 pain score, ambulation distance, range of motion, and LOS. We recommend against the use of ACB and instead recommend surgeons to perform an adequate periarticular cocktail injection.

The effect of topical tranexamic acid on functional outcomes and quality of life in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is being increasingly utilized to reduce blood loss after knee joint arthroplasty. However, there is a lack of studies on the effect of topical TXA on the functional outcomes and quality of life after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA). The aim of this study was to determine the effect of topical TXA on functional outcomes and quality of life scores in patients undergoing UKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients undergoing unilateral UKA at a single tertiary hospital from 2005 to 2017. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) The control group which did not receive TXA (n = 742); (2) The TXA group which received topical TXA (n = 331). Functional outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS), while quality of life was evaluated with the Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) of Short-Form 36 (SF-36) preoperatively and at 6 months and 2 years follow-up. RESULTS: At 6 months and 2 years post-surgery, there were no significant differences in the functional scores between the groups. The number of patients who attained minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for each of the functional scores was also comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing UKA, functional outcomes and quality of life scores were comparable between those who received topical TXA and those who did not. There was no significant improvement or impairment in knee function associated with topical TXA administration in UKA up to 2 years follow-up.

Alignment prior to total knee arthroplasty in high tibial osteotomy patients has no effect on subsequent functional outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The influence of prior high tibial osteotomy (HTO) on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) functional outcomes remains widely debated. Alignment of failed HTO can pose technical challenges with subsequent TKA. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of HTO alignment on the clinical outcomes of subsequent TKA. The secondary aim was to compare the time to TKA for each HTO alignment type. METHODS: Patients who underwent TKA post lateral closing-wedge HTO for symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis between 2001 and 2014 were prospectively followed up for 2 years. A total of 159 patients were assigned to three groups based on their pre-TKA femora tibia angles using long lower limb radiographs: varus alignment (VrA) ≤ 3o valgus, neutral alignment (NA) 3-9o valgus alignment, valgus alignment (VlA) ≥ 9o valgus. Functional outcomes were quantified using Knee Society Function Score and Knee Scores (KSFS and KSKS respectively), modified Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Short Form 36 Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS), and SF-36 Mental Component Score (SF-36 MCS). Pre-operative and post-operative knee range of motion were also measured. RESULTS: Mean pre-TKA KSKS in VrA patients (35 ± 18) was significantly lower than both NA (51 ± 19) and VlA (40 ± 21) patients (p < .05). Otherwise, there was no significant difference in functional outcome scores (KSFS, KSKS, OKS, SF-36 PCS and SF-36 MCS) or range of motion at 6 months and 2 years post-TKA. The mean duration from HTO to TKA was 12 ± 7 years with no significant differences between VrA, NA, and VlA HTO to TKA (13 ± 7 years, 13 ± 6 years and12 ± 8 years respectively, p > .05). CONCLUSION: HTO alignment did not influence time to subsequent TKA. HTO alignment did not influence early outcomes as well as radiological outcomes of subsequent TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Erratum to "Nonsurgical Management of Distal Femur Stem Cortical Perforation" [Arthroplasty Today 6 (2020) 153-157].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.03.002.].

All-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with increased risks of poorer knee society knee score and lower satisfaction in obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Although metal-backed tibial component (MB) is biomechanically superior to all-polyethylene (AP) implants in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), recent studies have shown comparable functional outcomes between the two. However, no study has examined this comparison in obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). We investigated whether functional outcomes between the two implants differ among obese patients, and whether the extent of obesity influences these outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty-two UKA implants from 347 obese patients were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were assessed using the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Function Score (KSFS), the original Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) attainment was recorded. Patients' fulfillment of expectations and satisfaction with the surgery outcome was also graded. Patients were further divided into lower obesity (BMI 30-34.9 kg/m2) and higher obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) to examine effect modification. RESULTS: There were no differences in functional outcomes and quality-of-life scores, MCID attainment of functional scores, as well as satisfaction and expectation fulfillment between AP and MB. Among higher obesity patients, AP was associated with a poorer KSKS (p = 0.031) and lower proportion of satisfaction fulfillment (p = 0.041) 2 years postoperatively compared to MB. CONCLUSION: We found no differences in functional and quality-of-life outcomes between fixed-bearing AP and MB tibial components among obese patients who underwent UKA. However, among higher obesity patients (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2), patients with AP tibial component were associated with lower KSKS score and a lower proportion of attaining satisfaction fulfillment 2 years postoperatively.

Defining the minimal clinically important difference for the knee society score following revision total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: No previous study has evaluated the MCID for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to identify the MCID for the Knee Society Score (KSS), for revision TKA. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 270 patients who underwent revision TKA at a single institution was analysed. Clinical assessment was performed preoperatively, at 6 months and 2 years using Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) and Knee (KSKS) Scores, and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). MCID was evaluated with a three-pronged methodology, using (1) anchor-based method with linear regression, (2) anchor-based method with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under curve (AUC), (3) distribution-based method with standard deviation (SD). The anchors used were improvement in OKS ≥ 5, patient satisfaction, and implant survivorship following revision TKA. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 70% females, with mean age of 69.0 years, that underwent unilateral revision TKA. The MCID determined by anchor-based linear regression method using OKS was 6.3 for KSFS, and 6.6 for KSKS. The MCID determined by anchor-based ROC was between 15 and 20 for KSFS (AUC: satisfaction = 71.8%, survivorship = 61.4%) and between 33 and 34 for KSKS (AUC: satisfaction = 76.3%, survivorship = 67.1%). The MCID determined by distribution-based method of 0.5 SD was 11.7 for KSFS and 11.9 for KSKS. CONCLUSION: The MCID of 6.3 points for KSFS, and 6.6 points for KSKS, is a useful benchmark for future studies looking to compare revision against primary TKA outcomes. Clinically, the MCID between 15 and 20 for KSFS and between 33 and 34 for KSKS is a powerful tool for discriminating patients with successful outcomes after revision TKA. Implant survivorship is an objective and naturally dichotomous outcome measure that complements the subjective measure of patient satisfaction, which future MCID studies could consider utilizing as anchors in ROC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

The Relationship of Transepicondylar Width with the Distal and Posterior Femoral Condyles and Its Clinical Implications: A Three-Dimensional Study.

BACKGROUND: Restoration of the anatomical joint line, while important for clinical outcomes, is difficult to achieve in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) due to distal femoral bone loss. The objective of this study was to determine a reliable method of restoring the anatomical joint line and posterior condylar offset in the setting of rTKA based on three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) images of the distal femur. METHODS: CT scans of 50 lower limbs were analyzed. Key anatomical landmarks such as the medial epicondyle (ME), lateral epicondyle, and transepicondylar width (TEW) were determined on 3D models constructed from the CT images. Best-fit planes placed on the most distal and posterior loci of points on the femoral condyles were used to define the distal and posterior joint lines, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the relationships between the anatomical landmarks and the distal and posterior joint lines. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the distance from the ME to the distal joint line of the medial condyle (MEDC) and the distance from the ME to the posterior joint line of the medial condyle (MEPC) (p < 0.001; r = 0.865). The mean ratio of MEPC to MEDC was 1.06 (standard deviation [SD]: 0.07; range: 0.88-1.27) and that of MEPC to TEW was 0.33 (SD: 0.03; range: 0.25-0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the fixed ratios of MEPC to TEW (0.33) and that of MEPC to MEDC (1.06) provide a reliable means for the surgeon to determine the anatomical joint line when used in combination.

Posterior condylar offset and posterior tibial slope targets to optimize knee flexion after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between posterior tibial slope (PTS), posterior condylar offset (PCO), femoral sagittal angle (FSA) on clinical outcomes, and propose optimal sagittal plane alignments for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: Prospectively collected data of 265 medial UKA was analysed. PTS, PCO, FSA were measured on preoperative and postoperative lateral radiographs. Clinical assessment was done at 6-month, 2-year and 10-year using Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Knee and Function scores, Short Form-36, range of motion (ROM), fulfilment of satisfaction and expectations. Implant survivorship was noted at mean 15-year. Kendall rank correlation test evaluated correlations of sagittal parameters against clinical outcomes. Multivariable linear regression evaluated predictors of postoperative ROM. Effect plots and interaction plots were used to identify angles with the best outcomes. (p < 0.05) was the threshold for statistical significance. RESULTS: There were significant correlations between PTS, PCO and FSA. Younger age, lower BMI, implant type, greater preoperative flexion, steeper PTS and preservation of PCO were significant predictors of greater postoperative flexion. There were significant interaction effects between PTS and PCO. Effect plots demonstrate a PTS between 2° to 8° and restoration of PCO within 1.5 mm of native values are optimal for better postoperative flexion. Interaction plot reveals that it is preferable to reduce PCO by 1.0 mm when PTS is 2° and restore PCO at 0 mm when PTS is 8°. CONCLUSION: UKA surgeons and future studies should be mindful of the relationship between PTS, PCO and FSA, and avoid considering them in isolation. When deciding on the method of balancing component gaps in UKA, surgeons should rely on the PTS. Decrease the posterior condylar cut when PTS is steep, and increase the posterior condylar cut when PTS is shallow. The acceptable range for PTS is between 2° to 8° and PCO should be restored to 1.5 mm of native values. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

No differences in 10-year clinical outcomes and quality of life between patients with different mediolateral femoral component positions in fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: There has been a paucity of literature evaluating the role of mediolateral femoral component position (FCP) in medial unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA). Hence, the aim of this study is to evaluate whether the mediolateral FCP in UKA will affect the 10-year clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients who underwent medial UKA. METHODS: Data of 262 patients who underwent medial UKA were analyzed. All patients were assessed at 6 months, 2 years and 10 years using the Knee Society Function Score, Knee Society Knee Score, Oxford Knee Score, Short-Form 36 Physical/Mental Component Scores and postoperative satisfaction. The mediolateral FCP on postoperative radiographs was measured by independent assessors using the Picture Archiving and Communication Systems. 144 patients were distributed into group C (center), 98 into group M (medial) and 20 into group L (lateral) according to FCP, and one-way ANOVA was used to compare the functional outcomes of the three groups. RESULTS: No statistical differences were found between the three groups in terms of 10-year clinical outcomes, quality of life, satisfaction rates and revision rates. CONCLUSION: Differences in mediolateral FCP did not result in significant difference in 10-year postoperative clinical outcomes for patients who underwent fixed-bearing medial UKAs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective study, Level III.