Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Head Neck ; 41(10): 3618-3623, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31347733

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of recurrent head and neck malignancy especially in the presence of a frozen neck is challenging. The superficial temporal vessels would be ideal as recipient vessels because they lie out of the previous surgical and radiation field. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study based on our database between January 2013 and June 2016. A total of 581 primary cases were selected as controls. The 60 test group patients had (a) recurrent head and neck reconstruction, (b) previous surgery and irradiation, (c) frozen neck, and (d) superficial temporal vessels as recipients. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between vascular compromise rates of superficial temporal vessels (anterograde and retrograde limbs) and controls (P > .05). Flap success rate of the test and control group is comparable, 95% vs 98% respectively. CONCLUSION: Superficial temporal vessels, both anterograde and retrograde, should be the first consideration for recurrent intraoral, facial, and scalp reconstruction with frozen necks.


Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/irrigação sanguínea , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Esvaziamento Cervical/efeitos adversos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Artérias Temporais/transplante , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/transplante , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pescoço/fisiopatologia , Esvaziamento Cervical/métodos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...