RESUMO
PURPOSE: To verify the feasibility of clinical-based discharge (CBD) criteria and to find out the reasons for the delayed discharge of outpatients after endoscopy procedures under drug-induced intravenous sedation. DESIGN: A prospectively observational study conducted at a tertiary endoscopy center. METHODS: Medical records were collected from outpatients admitted for endoscopy procedures under drug-induced intravenous sedation from June 1, 2021 to December 30, 2021. Patients were scheduled to discharge at least 30 minutes based on the time-based discharge (TBD) method. Postanesthetic discharge scoring system in the outpatient post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) recorded the time of patients discharged home on the CBD criteria. Postoperative complications were recorded in the PACU and within 24 hours after discharge. Multivariate analysis was applied to identify the factors relating to late discharges. FINDINGS: 10,597 patients were safely and successfully discharged home, and we were informed of no serious emergency or accidental readmissions to the hospital. The mean CBD time (21.77 ± 11.35 minutes) was compared with the TBD time (30 minutes) and actual TBD discharge time (61.56 ± 4.93 minutes), which were statistically significant, without changes in the patient's vital signs (P < .01). Primarily, further univariate and multivariate analyses showed that abdominal pain and fatigue were key factors accountable for delay in PACU discharge (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The study concluded that in patients undergoing ambulatory endoscopy procedures with drug-induced intravenous sedation, discharge times based on physiological scoring systems can efficiently and safely guide ambulatory patient discharge as compared to the traditional TBD method. Postoperative fatigue and pain were the main factors affecting patients discharge associated with a relatively long PACU length of stay.
RESUMO
Background: Transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is a classical technique for diagnosing mediastinal-hilar lymph node enlargement. However, the diagnostic value of conventional TBNA (cTBNA) is limited in small lymph nodes. Methods: Here, we generated an innovative multi-dimensional virtual lymph node map on top of Wang's lymph node map using a Lungpoint Virtual Bronchoscopic Navigation System. Results: The virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) system was combined with computed tomography (CT) images to generate extrabronchial, endobronchial, sagittal, coronal as well as horizontal views of the 11 intrathoracic lymph node stations and their adjacent tissues and blood vessels. We displayed the specific puncture site of each lymph node station. The 11 stations were divided into four groups: right mediastinal stations, left mediastinal stations, central mediastinal stations and hilar stations. Conclusion: The VBN system provides a precise view of the intrabronchial landmarks, which may increase the diagnostic accuracy of intrathoracic lymph node adenopathy and assist bronchoscopists with practicing TBNA.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Effective pain management is closely related to the prognosis of patients after surgery. Setting up acute pain service is among the effective strategies to control pain. The operation of acute pain service is mostly dominated by anesthesiologists; however, control of postsurgical pain is still unsatisfactory. Nurses are the main force for providing postoperative care of patients, and their role in acute pain service is crucial. Therefore, in the current study, we have developed a nurse-led pain relief model that emphasizes the central role of nurses during the entire surgical procedure. However, the effect of using this model for pain management among abdominal surgical patients remains unknown. AIMS: The current study was conducted to investigate the effect of using a nurse-led pain relief model for pain management among abdominal surgical patients. DESIGN: A single-center, propensity score-matched, controlled before-after study. METHODS: The patients, hospitalized for abdominal surgery in a university-affiliated hospital from January 2015 to December 2017, were enrolled and divided into group A (hospitalized before nurse-led pain relief model implementation, from January, 2015 to October, 2016) and group B (hospitalized after nurse-led pain relief model implementation, from October, 2016, to December, 2017) using propensity score match assay. The researchers compared the quality of acute pain management, the main side effects of pain management, and nurses' pain knowledge and attitude between group A and group B. RESULTS: A total of 2851 patients undergoing nonemergency abdominal surgery were enrolled in the current study and were propensity matched 1:1 into two groups with 1,127 subjects in each group. The quality of acute pain management postsurgery was better after implementation of the nurse-led pain relief model. More patients received higher numerical rating scales cores (≥4 points) at indicated time points after surgery in group A compared with group B (14.20% vs. 12.24% 6 hours postsurgery, p = .001; 12.33% vs. 8.52% 12 hours postsurgery, p = .004; 12.95% vs. 3.99% 24 hours postsurgery, p = .036; 16.06% vs. 7.19% 48 hours postsurgery, p = .001). Furthermore, the occurrence of nausea and vomiting during pain management were significantly decreased in patients from group B (nausea: X2 = 38.926, p < .05; vomit: X2 = 39.302, p < .05). Additionally, after using the nurse-led pain relief model, nurses were more open to improving their knowledge and attitudes to pain management (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that a nurse-led pain relief model can enhance the quality of acute pain management among post-abdominal surgical patients, suggesting that such a model can be an effective intervention for providing a better pain control among postsurgical patients.
