Proximal junctional fractures after long-segment instrumented fusion: comparisons between upper instrumented vertebrae and upper instrumented vertebrae + 1.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal junctional failure (PJF) is a well-known complication after long-segment (at least 4 vertebral levels) instrumented fusion. The etiologies of PJF include degenerative processes or are fracture induced. The fracture type of PJF includes vertebral fractures developed at the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) or UIV + 1. The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical and radiographic features of these two subtypes of PJF and to analyze risk factors in these patients. METHOD: In total, forty-two patients with PJF who underwent revision surgery were included. Twenty patients suffered fractures at the UIV, and the other 22 cases had fractures at UIV + 1. The weighted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and bone mineral density (BMD) T scores for these patients were recorded. Surgery-related data of index surgery and complications were collected. Radiographic parameters including pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), and PI-LL were recorded in both groups before and after the revision surgery. RESULT: Both groups had severe osteoporosis and comorbidities. The interval between the index surgery and revision surgery was shorter in the UIV group than in the UIV + 1 group (8.2 months vs. 35.9 months; p < 0.001). The analysis for radiographic parameters in UIV and UIV + 1 group demonstrated no significant change before and after the revision surgery. However, the preoperative radiographic analysis showed a larger PT (31.5° vs. 23.2°, p = 0.013), PI (53.7° vs. 45.3°, p = 0.035), and SVA (78.6° vs. 59.4°, p = 0.024) in the UIV group compared to the UIV + 1 group. The postoperative radiographic analysis showed a larger PI-LL (27.8° vs. 18.1°, p = 0.016) in the UIV group compared to the UIV + 1 group. CONCLUSION: PJF in the UIV group tends to occur earlier than in the UIV + 1 group. Moreover, more severe global sagittal imbalances were found in the UIV group than in UIV + 1 group.

Novel MRI-based vertebral bone quality score as a predictor of cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Decreased bone mineral density as measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) has been reported to be associated with cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). However, DEXA is not often available or routinely performed before surgery. A novel MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score has been developed and reported to be correlated with DEXA T-scores. The authors investigated the ability of the VBQ score to predict cage subsidence and other risk factors associated with this complication. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the authors reviewed the records of patients who had undergone single-level TLIF from March 2014 to October 2015 and had a follow-up of more than 2 years. Cage subsidence was measured as postoperative disc height loss and was graded according to the system proposed by Marchi et al. The MRI-based VBQ score was measured on T1-weighted images. Univariable analysis and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis were performed. Ad hoc analysis with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the predictive ability of the significant continuous variables. Additional analyses were used to determine the correlations between the VBQ score and T-scores and between the significant continuous variables and the amount of cage subsidence. RESULTS: Among 242 patients eligible for study inclusion, 111 (45.87%) had cage subsidence after the index operation. Multivariable logistic regression analyses demonstrated that an increased VBQ score (OR 14.615 ± 0.377, p < 0.001), decreased depth ratio (OR 0.011 ± 1.796, p = 0.013), and the use of kidney-shaped cages instead of bullet-shaped cages (OR 2.766 ± 0.358, p = 0.008) were associated with increased cage subsidence. The VBQ score was shown to significantly predict cage subsidence with an accuracy of 85.6%. The VBQ score was found to be moderately correlated with DEXA T-scores of the total hip (r = -0.540, p < 0.001) and the lumbar spine (r = -0.546, p < 0.001). The amount of cage subsidence was moderately correlated with the VBQ score (r = 0.512, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased VBQ scores, posteriorly placed cages, and kidney-shaped cages were risk factors for cage subsidence. The VBQ score was shown to be a good predictor of cage subsidence, was moderately correlated with DEXA T-scores for the total hip and lumbar spine, and also had a moderate correlation with the amount of cage subsidence.

Surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression in thoracic spine, anterior or posterior approach?

BACKGROUND: The most commonly encountered tumour of the spine is metastasis, and thoracic spine is the most commonly metastatic spine. Controversy exists regarding the optimal surgical approach for this kind of patient. The author conducted a study to assess the differences between anterior thoracotomy and a posterior approach in patients with malignant epidural cord compression in the thoracic spine. METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2017, 97 patients with metastatic thoracic lesion were stratified into two groups by approach method to the lesion site: Group A - mean anterior thoracotomy, decompression and fixation; and Group P - represented posterior decompression and fixation. Survival time, neurologic status, each complication by surgery or in hospital, and days in intensive care unit(ICU) were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were grouped in Group A, and 72 patients belonged to Group P. Lung cancer was the most common primary cancer in both groups. Operation time (213.0 vs. 199.2 min, p = 0.380) and blood loss (912.5 vs. 834.4 ml, p = 0.571) were not statistically significantly different between the two groups. Six patients in Group A (24%) and 6 in Group P (8.3%) developed complications (p = 0.040). Patients in Group A required more days of care in ICUs (2.36 vs. 0.19 days, p < 0.001). The longer survival was seen in Group P (15.4 vs. 11.2 months) but with no significant difference. CONCLUSION: A lower surgical complication rate and fewer days of care in ICU were seen in Group P. The authors would prefer a posterior approach for those with thoracic metastatic tumour.

The Influences of Spinopelvic Parameters and Associated Factors on Development of Proximal Instrumented Fracture After Posterior Instrumentation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate influences of spinopelvic parameters, such as lumbar lordosis (LL) angles, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and sagittal vertical axis, on development of the proximal junctional failure fracture type after posterior instrumentation. METHODS: This retrospective 1:3 matched case-control cohort study included 24 patients who developed proximal instrumented fracture in the study group and 72 patients without proximal junctional failure in the control group. Weighted Charlson Comorbidity Index and bone mineral density with T-score were recorded. In addition to spinopelvic parameters, proximal local kyphosis (PLK), which refers to a kyphosis angle between the upper end plate of upper instrumented vertebra plus 1 level and the lower end plate of upper instrumented vertebra; pelvic incidence-LL mismatch; and spinopelvic realignment score were calculated. RESULTS: More comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index, P = 0.002) and poorer bone density (T-score, P = 0.001) were noted in the study group. Before surgery, the study group had significantly lower LL (P = 0.046) and sacral slope (P = 0.043) and significantly higher PLK (P < 0.001) and pelvic tilt (P = 0.044) than the control group. Postoperatively, the study group had significantly higher PLK (P < 0.001) and lower LL (P = 0.031) than the control group; the degree of pelvic incidence-LL mismatch (P = 0.007) remained significantly higher in the study group. Preoperative (P = 0.026) and postoperative (P = 0.045) spinopelvic realignment scores was worse in the study group. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative PLK was the most significant radiographic factor to predict proximal instrumented fracture (P = 0.002, odds ratio 1.140, 95% confidence interval). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, appropriate LL and lower PLK should be obtained at surgery to prevent development of instrumented fracture.

A Retrospective Analysis in 1347 Patients Undergoing Cement Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: Is the Sandwich Vertebra at a Higher Risk of Further Fracture?

BACKGROUND: Multiple percutaneous vertebral cement augmentation may create sandwich vertebrae. Whether the sandwich vertebra is at higher risk of further fracture remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of further fractures of sandwich vertebrae and adjacent vertebrae and to identify potential risk factors for sandwich vertebral fractures. METHODS: Patients who underwent cement augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) in a single medical center between January 2012 and December 2015 were included. A sandwich vertebra was defined as an intact vertebra located between 2 previously cemented vertebrae. Demographic data and imaging findings were recorded. All patients were followed up for at least 24 mo postoperatively. During follow-up period, if the patient reported new-onset back pain with corresponding imaging findings, a diagnosis of sandwich vertebral fracture was made. RESULTS: Among the 1347 patients who underwent vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty for OVCFs, 127 patients with 128 fracture levels met the criteria for sandwich vertebrae (females/males 100/27, mean age 77.8 ± 7.7 yr old). The fracture location was most common in the thoraco-lumbar junction (T10-L2), 68.5% (87/127). The incidence of sandwich vertebral fracture was 21.3%, whereas the incidence of adjacent level fracture of those with no sandwich vertebra was 16.4% (196/1194), P = .1879. CONCLUSION: The incidence of sandwich vertebral fracture is not higher than that at the adjacent levels. The factor associated with further sandwich vertebral fracture was male gender. Once sandwich vertebral fracture occurred, patients may seek more surgical intervention than those with only adjacent fractures.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy presenting as subjective lower limb weakness could be a trap towards misdiagnosis.

When patients presenting with subjective lower limb weakness (SLLW) are encountered, it is natural to suspect a lumbar pathology and proceed with related clinical examination, investigations and management. However, SLLW could be a sign of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) due to an evolving cord compression. In such circumstances, if symptoms are not correlated to myelopathy at the earliest, there could be potential complications over time. In this study, we intend to analyse the outcomes after surgical management of the cervical or thoracic cord compression in patients with SLLW. Retrospectively, patients who presented to our center during the years 2010-2016 with sole complaint of bilateral SLLW but radiologically diagnosed to have a solitary cervical or thoracic stenosis, or tandem spinal stenosis and underwent surgical decompression procedures were selected. Their clinical presentation was categorised into three types, myelopathy was graded using Nurick's grading and JOA scoring; in addition, their lower limb functional status was assessed using the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS). Functional recovery following surgery was assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, one year, and two years. Selected patients (n = 24; Age, 56.4 ± 10.1 years; range 32-78 years) had SLLW for a period of 6.4 ± 3.2 months (range 2-13 months). Their preoperative JOA score was 11.3 ± 1.8 (range 7-15), and LEFS was 34.4 ± 7.7 (range 20-46). Radiological evidence of a solitary cervical lesion and tandem spinal stenosis was found in 6 and 18 patients respectively. Patients gradually recovered after surgical decompression with LEFS 59.8 ± 2.7 (range 56-65) at 1 year and JOA score 13.6 ± 2.7 (range - 17 to 100) at 2 years. The recovery rate at final follow up was 47.5%. Our results indicate the importance of clinically suspecting SLLW as an early non-specific sign of DCM to avoid misdiagnosis, especially in patients without conventional upper motor neuron signs. In such cases, surgical management of the cord compression resulted in significant functional recovery and halted the progression towards permanent disability.

Instrumented Posterolateral fusion versus instrumented Interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases in uremic patients under hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Advances in hemodialysis have facilitated longer lifespan and better quality of life for patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Symptomatic degenerative lumbar diseases (DLD) becomes more common in patients with ESRD. Posterior instrumented fusion remains popular for spinal stenosis combining instability. Only a few sporadic studies mentioned about surgical outcomes in patients with ESRD underwent spine surgeries, but no one discussed about which fusion method was optimal for this kind of patients. In this study, we compared the differences between lumbar posterolateral fusion (PLF) and lumbar interbody fusion (IBF) in uremic patients underwent instrumented lumbar surgeries. METHODS: Between January 2005 and December 2017, ESRD patients under maintenance hemodialysis underwent posterior instrumented fusion for DLD were reviewed. A PLF group and an IBF group were identified. The demographic data was collected using their medical records. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analogue scale (VAS); radiographic results were assessed using final fusion rates. Any surgical or implant-related complication was documented. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients (22 women and 12 men, mean age of 65.4 years) in PLF group and 45 patients (26 women and 19 men, mean age of 65.1 years) in IBF group were enrolled. Both groups had similar surgical levels. The operation time was longer (200.9 vs 178.3 min, p = 0.029) and the amount of blood loss was higher (780.0 vs 428.4 ml, p = 0.001) in the IBF group. The radiographic fusion rate was better in the PLF group but without significant difference (65.2% vs 58.8%, p = 0.356). Seven in the PLF group and ten in the IBF group developed surgical complications (20.5% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.788); three patients in the PLF group (8.8%) and five patients in the IBF group (11.1%) received revision surgeries because of implant-related or wound complications. Comparing to preoperative ODI and VAS, postoperative ODI and VAS obtained significant improvement in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Successful fusion rates and clinical improvement (VAS, ODI) were similar in IBF and PLF group. Uremic patients underwent IBF for DLD had longer length of operation and higher operative blood loss than underwent PLF.

Revision Surgery for Postoperative Spondylodiscitis at Cage Level after Posterior Instrumented Fusion in the Lumbar Spine-Anterior Approach Is Not Absolutely Indicated.

Spondylodiscitis at the cage level is rare but remains a challenge for spine surgeons. In this study, the safety and efficacy of revision surgery by a posterior approach to spondylodiscitis developed at the cage level were evaluated, and these data were compared to those of patients treated with revision surgeries using the traditional anterior plus posterior approach for their infections. Twenty-eight patients with postoperative spondylodiscitis underwent revision surgeries to salvage their infections, including 15 patients in the study group (posterior only) and 13 patients in the control group (combined anterior and posterior). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen in both groups. L4-L5 was the most common infection site in both groups. The operation time (229.5 vs. 449.5 min, p < 0.001) and blood loss (427.7 vs. 1106.9 mL, p < 0.001) were the only two data points that were statistically significantly different between the two groups. In conclusion, a single posterior approach with ipsilateral or contralateral transforaminal lumbar interbody debridement and fusion plus extending instrumentation was safe and effective for spondylodiscitis developed at the cage level. This strategy can decrease the operation time and blood loss.

Correction to: Staged surgery for tandem cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis: Which should be treated first?

The authors would like to acknowledge the following funding information that was missing in.

The correlations between the anchor density and the curve correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

BACKGROUND: The optimal anchor density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery to achieve good curve correction remains unclear. The purpose of the study is to analyze the correlations between three-dimensional curve correction and anchor density in the pedicle screw-based posterior fusion of AIS. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-seven AIS patients receiving primary posterior fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation were retrospectively reviewed. Anchor density (AD) was defined as the screws number per fused spinal segment. The correlations between three-dimensional curve correction radiographic parameters and anchor density were analyzed with subgroup analysis based on different curve types, curve magnitudes, and curve flexibilities. The differences of curve correction parameters between the low-density (AD ≤1.4), middle-density (1.4 < AD ≤1.7) and high-density (AD > 1.7) groups were also calculated. Independent t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were no correlations between the anchor density and the coronal curve correction or apical vertebral rotation (AVR) correction. In the sagittal plane, mild positive correlations existed between anchor density and thoracic kyphosis correction in all patients (r = 0.27, p = 0.002). Subgroup analysis revealed similar mild positive correlations in Lenke 1 (r = 0.31, p = 0.02), Lenke 1-3 (r = 0.27, p = 0.01), small curves (40°-60°, r = 0.38, p <  0.001), and flexible curves (flexibility > 40%, r = 0.34, p = 0.01). There were no differences between low-density (mean 1.31), middle-density (mean 1.55), and high-density (mean 1.83) in terms of coronal or axial curve correction parameters. Low-density group has longer fused level (mean difference 2.14, p = 0.001) and smaller thoracic kyphosis correction (mean difference 9.25°, p = 0.004) than high-density group. CONCLUSION: In our study, the anchor density was not related to coronal or axial curve corrections. Mild positive correlations with anchor density were found in thoracic kyphosis correction, especially in patients with smaller and flexible curves. Low anchor density with longer fusion level achieves similar curve corrections with middle or high anchor density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

Cage positioning as a risk factor for posterior cage migration following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - an analysis of 953 cases.

BACKGROUND: The risk of posterior cage migration (PCM) exists when a fusion cage is used for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). This complication is influenced by contact pressure between the endplate and the cage. Previous reports demonstrated that anteriorly located cages bore more load and had greater strain than posteriorly located cages. However, there have been no detailed reports on the correlation between cage positioning and PCM. METHODS: From March 2014 to October 2015, we reviewed 953 patients receiving open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation. One hundred patients without PCM were randomly sampled as the control group. Postoperative sagittal and coronal cage positions in the disc space were evaluated with the 'depth ratio' and the 'coronal ratio'. The demographic data of patients with and without PCM were compared to detect patient-related factors. Radiographic and cage related parameters, including cage position, preoperative disc height, preoperative spine stability, cage geometry, cage size, and height variance (= cage height - preoperative disc height) were compared between the PCM group and the control group. Univariate analyses and a multivariate logistic model were used to identify risk factors of PCM. RESULTS: Posterior cage migration occurred in 24 (2.52%) of 953 patients. The univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that those with a decreased depth ratio (OR, 9.78E-4; 95% CI, 9.69E-4 - 9.87E-4; p < 0.001) and height variance (OR, 0.757, 95% CI, 0.575-0997, p = 0.048) had a significantly higher risk of developing PCM. CONCLUSIONS: Our results verified that posteriorly located cages and undersized cages are more prone to developing PCM, which may aid surgeons in making optimal decisions during TLIF procedures.

Management of Infected Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage in Posterior Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The postoperative infection rates for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) have ranged from <2% to 4%. However, no consensus has been reached on the treatment strategies. TLIF cage preservation or revision surgery for lumbar spine reconstruction are 2 possible treatments. We aimed to determine the most effective method for organ/space infection control. METHODS: The data from 4923 patients who had undergone TLIF with cage and posterior pedicle-screw instrumentation for spondylolysis or degenerative spondylolisthesis from January 2008 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 4923 patients, 32 (0.65%) had developed organ/space infection of the interbody cage and were divided into 2 groups: those whose interbody cage was removed for revision (group 1) and those who interbody cage was retained (group 2). We compared the initial management of both groups in terms of age, sex, elapsed time to diagnosis, changes in spinal lordotic angle, visual analog scale score, fusion status, and Kirkaldy-Willis functional outcomes. RESULTS: The 32 patients with organ/space infection had a mean age of 66.3 years and a follow-up period of 23.8 months. Significant differences were observed in the mean elapsed time to diagnosis (P = 0.004), lordotic angle correction at the disease level (P = 0.03), and Kirkaldy-Wallis functional outcomes (P = 0.01). Of the 17 patients undergoing debridement for implant retention, 9 (52.9%) exhibited poor results. CONCLUSIONS: The most important factor contributing to TLIF cage retention failure was epidural fibrosis of the previous transforaminal route and biofilm adhesion on interbody devices affecting infection clearance. Thus, we would recommend a combined anterior and posterior approach or the transforaminal route for radical debridement with cage removal and fusion to achieve better clinical outcomes.

Short-Segment Instrumentation with Fractured Vertebrae Augmentation by Screws and Bone Substitute for Thoracolumbar Unstable Burst Fractures.

BACKGROUND: For thoracolumbar burst fractures, traditional four-screw (one above and one below) short-segment instrumentation is popular and has a high failure rate. Additional augmentation at the fractured vertebrae is believed to reduce surgical failure. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical and radiographic results of patients who underwent short-segment posterior instrumentation with augmentation by screws and bone substitutes at the fractured vertebrae and to compare these data to those of patients who underwent long-segment instrumentation for thoracolumbar burst fractures. METHODS: The study group had twenty patients who underwent short-segment instrumentation with additional augmentation by two screws and bone substitutes at the fractured vertebrae. The control group contained twenty-two patients who underwent eight-screw long instrumentation without vertebra augmentation. Local kyphosis and the anterior body height of the fractured vertebrae were measured. The severity of the fractured vertebrae was evaluated with the load sharing classification (LSC). Any implant failure or loss of correction >10° at the final follow-up was defined as surgical failure. RESULTS: Both groups had similar distributions in terms of age, sex, the injured level, and the mechanism of injury before operation. During the operation, the study group had significantly less blood loss (136.0 vs. 363.6 ml, p=0.001) and required shorter operating times (146.8 vs. 157.5 minutes, p=0.112) than the control group. Immediately after surgery, the study group had better correction of the local kyphosis angle (13.4° vs. 11.9°, p=0.212) and restoration of the anterior height (34.7% vs. 31.0%, p=0.326) than the control group. At the final follow-up, no patients in the study group and only one patient in the control group experienced surgical failure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures who received six-screw short-segment posterior fixators with augmentation at the level of the fractured vertebrae via injectable artificial bone substitute achieved satisfactory clinical and radiographic results, and this method could replace long-segment instrumentation methods used in unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Transforaminal Interbody Debridement and Fusion to Manage Postdiscectomy Discitis in Lumbar Spine.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, nonoperative management with long-term antibiotics and bed rest has been recommended as first-line treatment for most patients with postoperative discitis. A recent trend in treatment under a limited range of indications has been to perform surgical débridement followed by long-term administration of antibiotics. This descriptive study investigated whether transforaminal lumbar interbody débridement and fusion (TLIDF) combined with intravenous antibiotics is appropriate to manage postdiscectomy discitis. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed demographic data, laboratory data, and radiography and magnetic resonance imaging of 10 patients with postoperative discitis who underwent surgical TLIDF followed by antibiotic treatment. Preoperative and postoperative spine sagittal alignment, visual analog scale scores, and Kirkaldy-Willis criteria for functional outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: An infection clearance rate of 100% was ultimately achieved for the patients who underwent TLIDF with short posterior instrumentation. TLIDF yielded better outcomes than traditional conservative treatment in terms of spine alignment correction, functional outcomes, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Based on previously reported data and the findings of this study, we suggest that surgical intervention should be used in certain cases, as it can achieve better outcomes than conservative treatment. We recommend a novel single posterior approach with TLIDF and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation for management of postdiscectomy discitis.

Staged surgery for tandem cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis: Which should be treated first?

PURPOSE: Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) refers to lumbar and cervical spinal canal stenosis. Staged surgery is often chosen, but sometimes, mere decompression of one stenosis is adequate to relieve symptoms. Therefore, we intend to analyze whether starting with the cervical or the lumbar region is the most logical option. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 47 patients with TSS, having first-stage decompression for the most symptomatic stenosis, and classified into two groups (Group A: lumbar decompression first, Group B: cervical decompression first). Postoperative outcomes were analyzed for at least 2 years, and they were cautiously watched for symptoms of the non-operated stenosis; if such symptoms were debilitating, second-stage surgery for the non-operated stenosis was done. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of Group A (n = 11) and Group B (n = 36) were comparable. One patient (9%) in Group A and 25 patients (67%) in Group B had resolution of symptoms and good functional recovery. The need for a second-stage surgery for the non-operated stenosis was significantly high (p = 0.001) among patients in Group A. They suffered a significant worsening of both the mJOA score and the Nurick's grade; whereas, patients in Group B experienced staged improvement of both scales. CONCLUSION: First-stage surgery for the cervical stenosis significantly lowers the need of the second-stage surgery. In contrast, if lumbar stenosis was treated first, a dramatic exacerbation of the symptoms related to the cervical stenosis can occur soon. Therefore, treatment of cervical stenosis first seems to be more appropriate. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Factors related to post surgical neurologic improvement for cervical spine infection.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine infections are uncommon but potentially dangerous, having the highest rate of neurological compromise and resulting disability. However, the factors related to surgical success is multiple yet unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 27 patients (16 men and 11 women) with cervical spine infection who underwent surgical treatment at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou branch, between 2001 and 2014. The neurological status, by Frankel classification, was recorded preoperatively and at discharge. Group X had neurologic improvement of at least 1 grade, group Y had unchanged neurologic status, and group Z showed deterioration. We recorded the patient demographic data, presenting symptoms and signs, interval from admission to surgery, surgical procedure, laboratory data, perioperative antibiotic course, pathogens identified, coexisting medical disease, concomitant nonspinal infection, and clinical outcomes. We intended to evaluate the different characteristics of patients who improved neurologically after treatment. RESULTS: The mean age of our cohort was 56.6 years. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion was the most commonly performed surgical procedure (74.1%). The Frankel neurological status improved in 70.4% (group X, n = 19) and unchanged in 29.6% (group Y, n = 8). No patients worsened. Motor weakness was most common (96.3%) neurological deficit, followed by sensory abnormalities (37.0%), and bowel/urine incontinence (33.3%). The main difference in presentation between group X and group Y was neck pain (100% vs. 75.0%; p = .02), not fever. Group X had a shorter preoperative antibiotic course (p = .004), interval from admission to operation (p = .02), and hospital stay (p = .01). CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be more suspicious in patients who present with neck pain and any neurological involvement even in those without fever while establishing early diagnosis. Earlier operative treatment in group X result in better neurologic recovery and shorter hospital stay due to disease improvement.

Is Convex Derotation Equally Effective as Concave Derotation for Achieving Adequate Correction of Selective Lenke's Type- 1 Scoliosis?

BACKGROUND: Correcting the scoliosis and stabilizing the spine in the corrected position is the basis of treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Spinal instrumentation and derotation are the principle steps of surgery for any type of AIS. A perspicuous understanding needs to be attained regarding derotation maneuvers in practice; therefore, we intend to compare radiological outcomes following concave and convex rod derotation maneuvers to analyze their efficacy to correct selective Lenke's Type-1 scoliosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, 88 patients with Lenke's Type-1 scoliosis who were operated with selective thoracic instrumentation were divided into two groups depending on the derotation side. Preoperative radiographs were analyzed for curve angles, thoracic apical vertebral translation, apical vertebral rotation, and coronal/sagittal balance. Postoperative and followup assessment was focused on curve correction. Correction rate of main thoracic (MT) curve and its corresponding loss of correction at final followup are calculated. RESULTS: Concave group (n = 40; age 13.8 ± 1.9) and the convex group (n = 48; Age 14.3 ± 2.4) showed similar demographic characteristics. Postoperative and followup parameters showed no significant difference. Correction rate of MT curve between both groups (concave group = 69.2 ± 10.5%; convex group = 66 ± 12.8%; P = 0.20) was similar. There was minimal loss of correction at final followup among both groups (concave group = 2.2° ±5.4°; Convex group = 1.5° ± 4.8°; P = 0.52). CONCLUSION: The study results showed similar sustained satisfactory correction of flexible Lenke's type 1 scoliotic curves irrespective of the derotation maneuver used. Adequate correction, thereby restoring balance was predominantly perceived among the entire sample. Hence, convex derotation can be considered equally effective as that of concave derotation for achieving adequate correction of selective Lenke's Type-1 scoliosis.

The influence of spinopelvic parameters on adjacent-segment degeneration after short spinal fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE: Spinopelvic parameters, such as the pelvic incidence (PI) angle, sacral slope angle, and pelvic tilt angle, are important anatomical indices for determining the sagittal curvature of the spine and the individual variability of the lumbar lordosis (LL) curve. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of spinopelvic parameters and LL on adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD) after short lumbar and lumbosacral fusion for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of all short lumbar and lumbosacral fusion surgeries performed between August 2003 and July 2010 for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis in their orthopedic department. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients (21 women and 9 men, mean age 64 years) with ASD after lower lumbar or lumbosacral fusion surgery comprised the study group. Thirty matched patients (21 women and 9 men, mean age 63 years) without ASD comprised the control group, according to the following matching criteria: same diagnosis on admission, similar pathologic level (≤ 1 level difference), similar sex, and age. The average follow-up was 6.8 years (range 5-8 years). The spinopelvic parameters had no significant influence on ASD after short spinal fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the spinopelvic parameters nor a mismatch of PI and LL were significant factors responsible for ASD after short spinal fusion due to single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis.