Synergistic induction of mitotic pyroptosis and tumor remission by inhibiting proteasome and WEE family kinases.

Mitotic catastrophe (MC), which occurs under dysregulated mitosis, represents a fascinating tactic to specifically eradicate tumor cells. Whether pyroptosis can be a death form of MC remains unknown. Proteasome-mediated protein degradation is crucial for M-phase. Bortezomib (BTZ), which inhibits the 20S catalytic particle of proteasome, is approved to treat multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, but not solid tumors due to primary resistance. To date, whether and how proteasome inhibitor affected the fates of cells in M-phase remains unexplored. Here, we show that BTZ treatment, or silencing of PSMC5, a subunit of 19S regulatory particle of proteasome, causes G2- and M-phase arrest, multi-polar spindle formation, and consequent caspase-3/GSDME-mediated pyroptosis in M-phase (designated as mitotic pyroptosis). Further investigations reveal that inhibitor of WEE1/PKMYT1 (PD0166285), but not inhibitor of ATR, CHK1 or CHK2, abrogates the BTZ-induced G2-phase arrest, thus exacerbates the BTZ-induced mitotic arrest and pyroptosis. Combined BTZ and PD0166285 treatment (named BP-Combo) selectively kills various types of solid tumor cells, and significantly lessens the IC50 of both BTZ and PD0166285 compared to BTZ or PD0166285 monotreatment. Studies using various mouse models show that BP-Combo has much stronger inhibition on tumor growth and metastasis than BTZ or PD0166285 monotreatment, and no obvious toxicity is observed in BP-Combo-treated mice. These findings disclose the effect of proteasome inhibitors in inducing pyroptosis in M-phase, characterize pyroptosis as a new death form of mitotic catastrophe, and identify dual inhibition of proteasome and WEE family kinases as a promising anti-cancer strategy to selectively kill solid tumor cells.

LncRNA SNHG17 interacts with LRPPRC to stabilize c-Myc protein and promote G1/S transition and cell proliferation.

Oncogenic c-Myc is a master regulator of G1/S transition. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) emerge as new regulators of various cell activities. Here, we found that lncRNA SnoRNA Host Gene 17 (SNHG17) was elevated at the early G1-phase of cell cycle. Both gain- and loss-of function studies disclosed that SNHG17 increased c-Myc protein level, accelerated G1/S transition and cell proliferation, and consequently promoted tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, the 1-150-nt of SNHG17 physically interacted with the 1035-1369-aa of leucine rich pentatricopeptide repeat containing (LRPPRC) protein, and disrupting this interaction abrogated the promoting role of SNHG17 in c-Myc expression, G1/S transition, and cell proliferation. The effect of SNHG17 in stimulating cell proliferation was attenuated by silencing c-Myc or LRPPRC. Furthermore, silencing SNHG17 or LRPPRC increased the level of ubiquitylated c-Myc and reduced the stability of c-Myc protein. Analysis of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissues revealed that SNHG17, LRPPRC, and c-Myc were significantly upregulated in HCC, and they showed a positive correlation with each other. High level of SNHG17 or LRPPRC was associated with worse survival of HCC patients. These data suggest that SNHG17 may inhibit c-Myc ubiquitination and thus enhance c-Myc level and facilitate proliferation by interacting with LRPPRC. Our findings identify a novel SNHG17-LRPPRC-c-Myc regulatory axis and elucidate its roles in G1/S transition and tumor growth, which may provide potential targets for cancer therapy.

A hMTR4-PDIA3P1-miR-125/124-TRAF6 Regulatory Axis and Its Function in NF kappa B Signaling and Chemoresistance.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: DNA damage-induced NF-κB activation is a major obstacle to effective antitumour chemotherapy. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) that regulate chemoresistance of cancer cells remain largely unknown. This study aimed to characterize the lncRNAs that may affect chemotherapy sensitivity. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We found that lncRNA PDIA3P1 (protein disulfide isomerase family A member 3 pseudogene 1) was up-regulated in multiple cancer types and following treatment with DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic agents, like doxorubicin (Dox). Higher PDIA3P1 level was associated with poorer recurrence-free survival of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Both gain-of-function and loss-of-function studies revealed that PDIA3P1 protected cancer cells from Dox-induced apoptosis and allowed tumor xenografts to grow faster and to be more resistant to Dox treatment. Mechanistically, miR-125a/b and miR-124 suppressed the expression of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), but PDIA3P1 bound to miR-125a/b/miR-124 and relieved their repression on TRAF6, leading to activation of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway. Consistently, the effect of PDIA3P1 inhibition in promoting Dox-triggered apoptosis was antagonized by silencing the inhibitor of κBα (IκBα) or overexpressing TRAF6. Administration of BAY 11-7085, an NF-κB inhibitor attenuated PDIA3P1-induced resistance to Dox treatment in mouse xenografts. Moreover, up-regulation of PDIA3P1 was significantly correlated with elevation of TRAF6, phosphorylated p65, or NF-κB downstream anti-apoptosis genes in human HCC tissues. These data indicate that enhanced PDIA3P1 expression may confer chemoresistance by acting as a microRNA sponge to increase TRAF6 expression and augment NF-κB signaling. Subsequent investigations into the mechanisms of PDIA3P1 up-regulation revealed that human homologue of mRNA transport mutant 4 (hMTR4), which promotes RNA degradation, could bind to PDIA3P1, and this interaction was disrupted by Dox treatment. Overexpression of hMTR4 attenuated Dox-induced elevation of PDIA3P1, whereas silencing hMTR4 increased PDIA3P1 level, suggesting that Dox may up-regulate PDIA3P1 by abrogating the hMTR4-mediated PDIA3P1 degradation. CONCLUSION: There exists a hMTR4-PDIA3P1-miR-125/124-TRAF6 regulatory axis that regulates NF-κB signaling and chemoresistance, which may be exploited for anticancer therapy.

Lnc-UCID Promotes G1/S Transition and Hepatoma Growth by Preventing DHX9-Mediated CDK6 Down-regulation.

Although thousands of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been annotated, only a limited number of them have been functionally characterized. Here, we identified an oncogenic lncRNA, named lnc-UCID (lncRNA up-regulating CDK6 by interacting with DHX9). Lnc-UCID was up-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and a higher lnc-UCID level was correlated with shorter recurrence-free survival of HCC patients. Both gain-of-function and loss-of function studies revealed that lnc-UCID enhanced cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) expression and thereby promoted G1/S transition and cell proliferation. Studies from mouse xenograft models revealed that tumors derived from lnc-UCID-silenced HCC cells had a much smaller size than those from control cells, and intratumoral injection of lnc-UCID small interfering RNA suppressed xenograft growth. Mechanistically, the 850-1030-nt domain of lnc-UCID interacted physically with DEAH (Asp-Glu-Ala-His) box helicase 9 (DHX9), an RNA helicase. On the other hand, DHX9 post-transcriptionally suppressed CDK6 expression by binding to the 3'-untranslated region (3'UTR) of CDK6 mRNA. Further investigation disclosed that lnc-UCID enhanced CDK6 expression by competitively binding to DHX9 and sequestering DHX9 from CDK6-3'UTR. In an attempt to explore the mechanisms responsible for lnc-UCID up-regulation in HCC, we found that the lnc-UCID gene was frequently amplified in HCC. Furthermore, miR-148a, whose down-regulation was associated with an increase of lnc-UCID in HCC, could bind lnc-UCID and inhibit its expression. Conclusion: Up-regulation of lnc-UCID, which may result from amplification of its gene locus and down-regulation of miR-148a, can promote HCC growth by preventing the interaction of DHX9 with CDK6 and subsequently enhancing CDK6 expression. These findings provide insights into the biological functions of lncRNAs, the regulatory network of cell cycle control, and the mechanisms of HCC development, which may be exploited for anticancer therapy.

The distribution of sialic acid receptors of avian influenza virus in the reproductive tract of laying hens.

The susceptibility of the host to influenza virus is determined by the distribution of the sialic acid (SA) receptors on host cell membrane. Avian influenza virus (AIV) preferentially binds to SA α-2,3-galactose (SA α2,3-gal) linked receptors, while human strains bind to sialic acid α2,6-galactose (SA α2,6-gal) linked receptors. Here, we describe the SA patterns and distributions in the reproductive tract of hens by employing two specific lectins, Maackia amurensis agglutinin (MAA) for SA α2,3-gal and sambucus nigra agglutinin (SNA) for SA α 2,6-gal receptors. Our results revealed that both SA α2,3-gal and SA α2,6-gal receptors exist in the reproductive tract of hens, including magnum, isthmus, uterus and vagina except for infundibulum. The distribution of SAα-2,3-gal receptor was more abundantly in the columnar epithelium cells of magnum, isthmus and uterus. Only minimal positive results for SA α-2,6-gal receptors were detected in the columnar epithelium cells of magnum, isthmus, uterus and vagina. Furthermore, AIV in tissues of the reproductive tract tissues of laying hens were detected by SYBR green-based reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results showed that both viral loads and pathological changes in different parts of the reproductive tract were positively correlated with the expression of both receptors. Our results revealed that the reproductive tract of hens may provide an environment for the replication of both avian and human influenza viruses.

[Chemical constituents from ethyl acetate extract of Shiaria bambusicola].

Fourteen compounds were isolated and purified from the ethyl acetate of the ethanol extract of Shiaria bambusicola by various chromatographic methods, and their structures were elucidated by spectral techniques and physicochemical properties as hypocrellin A (1), hypocrellin B (2), hypocrellin C (3), hypomycin A (4), ergosterol (5), ergosterol peroxide (6), (22E, 24R)-5alpha, 8alpha-epidioxy-6,9(11),22-trien-3beta-ol (7), ergosta-7, 24(28)-dien-3beta-ol (8), (22E, 24R)-ergost-7, 22-dien-3beta, 5alpha, 6beta-triol (9), (22E,24R)-ergosta-7, 22-diene-3beta, 5alpha, 6beta-triol-3-O-palmitate (10), (22E, 24R)-ergosta-7, 22-diene-3beta, 5alpha, 6beta-triol-6-O-palmitate (11), 1-O-monostearin (12), 1, 3-O-distearin (13), and mannitol (14). Among them, compounds 7-13 were firstly isolated from this genus.