Yttrium-90 Radiation Segmentectomy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Dosimetry of Glass-Based versus Resin-Based Microspheres.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the differences in safety, effectiveness, and dosimetry between glass-based and resin-based ablative yttrium-90 (90Y) transarterial radioembolization (TARE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, both tumor response and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at 3 months after 90Y-TARE. Post procedure 90Y-bremsstrahlung single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography voxel-based dosimetry analysis was used to create tumor dose (TD) and normal tissue dose (NTD) volume histograms, and to calculate tumor particle loading and specific activity. The TD and NTD receiver operating characteristic curves evaluated the dose threshold able to predict objective (partial or complete) and complete tumor responses in addition to any-grade and grade ≥3 AE incidences. The chi-square test and Student t-test were used to assess variable differences where appropriate. RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2020, 81 patients with HCC (20 in the resin-based cohort and 61 in the glass-based cohort) underwent ablative 90Y-TARE. The resin-based cohort had more males (89% vs 65%, P = .03), lower tumor-to-normal ratio (1.81 ± 0.39 vs 2.22 ± 0.94, P = .03), higher tumor particle loading (40,172 particles/mL ± 28,039 vs 17,081 particles/mL ± 12,555, P = .0001), lower specific activity (158 Bq/particle ± 3 vs 1,058 Bq/particle ± 331, P = .001), and lower mean TD (308 Gy ± 210 vs 794 Gy ± 523, P = .0002) than the glass-based cohort. No significant differences in baseline characteristics or posttreatment AEs were noted. The overall objective and complete response rates were 85% (95% resin-based vs 82% glass-based; P = .1) and 65% (95% resin-based vs 56% glass-based; P = .003), respectively. The mean TD thresholds able to predict the objective and complete responses were 176 Gy and 247 Gy for resin-based radioembolization and 290 Gy and 481 Gy for glass-based radioembolization, respectively. A maximum NTD of 999 Gy predicted any-grade AEs in glass-based ablative 90Y-TARE. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with glass-based ablative 90Y-TARE, resin-based ablative 90Y-TARE can offer comparable safety and effectiveness profiles for patients with HCC. The impact of the significantly different tumor particle loading, particle specific activities, and delivered TDs on tumor response outcomes merits further investigation.

Correlation of Non-tumoral Liver Dose with Treatment-Related Adverse Events in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Glass-Based Yttrium-90 Radioembolization.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between non-tumor liver (NTL) dose and adverse events (AE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with glass-based Yttrium-90 radioembolization (Y90-RE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with HCC treated with Y90-RE between 2013 and 2018 was performed. Baseline characteristics including demographics and Y90-RE treatment approach were captured. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5 was assessed at months 3 and 6 post-treatment. Using voxel-based dosimetry with MIM Software V. 6.9, dose-volume histograms of treated area of liver were created. Receiver operator characteristic curve was used to determine NTL dose threshold predicting AEs. Multivariate analysis was used to determine independent clinical factors of predicting severe AEs. Chi-square analysis was used to compare proportions. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine consecutive patients (115(50.2%) lobar and 114(49.8%) segmental) were included. At 3 months, there was a lower rate of any grade AE (55(46%) segmental and 36(31%) lobar, p = 0.009) and increased rate of severe AEs for lobar compared to segmental (2(2%) segmental and 9(8%) lobar, p = 0.029). At 6 months, severe AEs were greater for lobar than segmental (1(1%) segmental vs 10(9%) lobar, p = 0.005). For lobar Y90-RE, mean NTL dose of 112 Gy predicted severe AE (89% sensitivity and 91% specificity (AUC = 0.95, p = < 0.0001) at 3 and 6 months. For the segmental group, no significant association was found between NTL dose and severe treatment-related AE at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: In patients with HCC undergoing glass-based lobar Y90-RE, NTL dose of > 112 Gy is associated with severe treatment-related AEs at 3-6 months.

Role of Resin Microsphere Y90 Dosimetry in Predicting Objective Tumor Response, Survival and Treatment Related Toxicity in Surgically Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Retrospective Single Institution Study.

PURPOSE: To Evaluate the correlation between tumor dosimetric parameters with objective tumor response (OR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with surgically unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) undergoing resin-based Ytrrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy (Y90 SIRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 45 consecutive patients with CRLM underwent resin-based Y90 SIRT in one or both hepatic lobes (66 treated lobes total). Dose volume histograms were created with MIM Sureplan® v.6.9 using post-treatment SPECT/CT. Dosimetry analyses were based on the cumulative volume of the five largest tumors in each treatment session and non-tumoral liver (NTL) dose. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate tumor dosimetric factors in predicting OR by Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors at 3 months post-Y90. Additionally, ROC curve was used to evaluate non-tumoral liver dose as a predictor of grade ≥ 3 liver toxicity and radioembolization induced liver disease (REILD) 3 months post Y90. To minimize for potential confounding demographic and clinical factors, univariate and multivariate analysis of survival with mean tumor dose as one of the factors were also performed. Kaplan-Meier estimation was used for OS analysis from initial Y90 SIRT. RESULTS: 26 out of 45 patients had OR with a median OS of 17.2 months versus 6.8 months for patients without OR (p < 0.001). Mean tumor dose (TD) of the five largest tumors was the strongest predictor of OR with an area under the curve of 0.73 (p < 0.001). Minimum TD, and TD to 30%, 50%, and 70% of tumor volume also predicted OR (p's < 0.05). Mean TD ≥ 100 Gy predicted a significantly prolonged median OS of 19 vs. 11 months for those receiving TD < 100 Gy (p = 0.016). On univariate analysis, mean TD < 100 Gy, presence of any genomic mutation, presence of MAPK pathway mutation, bilobar hepatic metastases and diffuse metastatic disease (>10 lesions per liver lobe) were found to be predictors of shorter median OS. On multivariate analysis, mean TD < 100 Gy, presence of any genomic mutation, and diffuse hepatic metastatic disease were found to be independent predictors of shorter OS. Overall, six (13.3%) patients developed grade ≥ 3 liver toxicity post Y90 of whom two (4.4%) patients developed REILD. No dose threshold predicting grade ≥ 3 liver toxicity or REILD was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Mean TD ≥ 100 Gy in patients with unresectable CRLM undergoing resin-based Y90 SIRT predicts OR and prolonged OS.

Determination of tumour dose response threshold and implication on survival in patients with HCC treated with Y90 radiation segmentectomy: a simple semi-quantitative analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between Yttrium-90 (Y90) tumour dose and response rate in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo Y90 radiation segmentectomy (Y90-RS) and to determine implication on overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Post Y90-RS Bremsstrahlung single-photon emission computed tomography/CT of 105 HCC patients with 110 treatments performed with glass microspheres was retrospectively analysed. The dose-volume histogram of the targeted tumour was determined with commercially available dosimetry software. Tumour response at 3 months was evaluated using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Tumour dose thresholds associated with the objective response with 80% specificity were then used to evaluate implication on OS using Kaplan-Meier estimation and log-rank analysis. RESULTS: Tumour dose thresholds to predict objective response with 80% specificity were the following: maximum tumour dose (748 Gy), mean tumour dose (568 Gy), minimum tumour dose of 30% tumour volume (608 Gy), minimum tumour dose of 50% tumour volume (565 Gy), minimum tumour dose of 70% tumour volume (464 Gy) and minimum tumour dose of 100% tumour volume (213 Gy). These parameters all significantly predicted tumour response with areas under the ROC curve of >0.6. Mean tumour dose of ≥250 Gy predicted median OS of 43.67 vs. 17.87 months for others (P = 0.026). Minimum dose ≥180 Gy to 100% of tumour volume predicted median OS of 44.93 vs. 35.87 months for others (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: In patients with HCC undergoing Y90-RS, mean tumour dose ≥250 Gy and minimum tumour dose of ≥180 Gy to 100% of tumour volume are both significantly correlated with higher objective tumour response and prolonged survival.

Determination of Tumor Dose Response Thresholds in Patients with Chemorefractory Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Treated with Resin and Glass-based Y90 Radioembolization.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacies of glass and resin-based Yttrium-90 microspheres by comparing absorbed tumor dose (TD) with both tumor response (TR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with chemorefractory intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: Post-Y90 treatment bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT of 38 consecutive patients receiving 45 treatments (21 resin microspheres, 24 glass microspheres) were analyzed retrospectively. MIM software v6.9.4 (MIM Software Inc, Cleveland, OH) was used to calculate targeted tumors' dose volume histogram. Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was used to evaluate tumor response 3 months post-treatment. Kaplan Meier estimation was used for survival analysis. T-test was used to compare the devices on various dosimetric parameters. RESULTS: Thresholds for TD to predict TR with ≥ 80% specificity were as follows: mean TD (Resin: 78.9 Gy; Glass: 254.7 Gy), maximum TD (Resin: 162.9 Gy; Glass: 591 Gy), minimum TD (Resin: 53.7 Gy; Glass: 149.1 Gy). Microsphere type had no effect on survival from first Y90 (Resin: 11.2 mo; Glass 10.9 mo [p = 0.548]). In patients receiving resin microspheres, mean TD ≥ 75 Gy or maximum TD ≥ 150 Gy was associated with median OS of 20.2 mo compared to 6.5 mo for those receiving less (p = 0.001, 0.002, respectively). For patients treated with glass microspheres, those receiving a mean TD ≥ 150 Gy had a median OS of 14.6 mo vs. 2.6 mo for those receiving less (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: TD thresholds predictive of TR and OS differ significantly between glass and resin microspheres. However, microsphere type has no impact on survival in patients with chemorefractory ICC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Retrospective Study.

Tumor-to-Normal Ratio Relationship between Planning Technetium-99 Macroaggregated Albumin and Posttherapy Yttrium-90 Bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT.

PURPOSE: To quantify the relationship of the tumor-to-normal ratio (TNR) attained from the technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (MAA) and posttreatment yttrium-90 bremsstrahlung (Y90-Brem) single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT)/computer tomography (CT) studies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with glass microspheres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, a total of 190 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent 204 MAA and Y90-Brem SPECT/CT for glass microsphere Y90 radiation segmentectomy (Y90-RS) or lobar treatment (Y90-RLT) between 2013 and 2018 were included. Semi-automated regions-of-interests were drawn around the targeted tumor and nontumoral liver tissue on the SPECT/CT studies. TNR values from MAA and Y90-Brem SPECT/CT were compared using paired t-tests, Pearson correlation, and median with interquartile ranges (IQR). RESULTS: The mean TNR for MAA and Y90-Brem SPECT/CT was 2.96 ± 1.86 (median, 2.64; IQR, 2.50) and 2.29 ± 1.10 (median, 2.06; IQR, 1.05), respectively (P < .0001). The mean Y90-RLT TNR was 2.88 ± 1.67 (median, 2.59; IQR, 0.83) and 2.17 ± 0.89 (median, 1.98; IQR, 0.81) for MAA and Y90-Brem SPECT/CT, respectively (P < .0001). The mean Y90-RS TNR was 3.02 ± 2.01 (median, 2.87; IQR, 3.01) and 2.39 ± 1.25 (median, 2.11; IQR, 1.28) for MAA and Y90-Brem SPECT/CT, respectively (P = .0003). TNR attained from MAA and Y90 SPECT/CT studies showed a moderate correlation in a positive linear fashion for the overall (r = 0.54; P < .001), Y90-RLT (r = 0.66, P < .001), and Y90-RS cohorts (r = 0.48, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The TNR attained from Y90-Brem SPECT/CT is often underestimated, positively correlated, and less variable than that attained from MAA SPECT/CT.

Evaluation of Medium-Term Efficacy of Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy vs Percutaneous Microwave Ablation in Patients with Solitary Surgically Unresectable < 4 cm Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Y90 radiation segmentectomy (RS) vs. percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with solitary HCC ≤ 4 cm. METHODS: From 2014 to 2017, 68 consecutive treatment naïve patients were included (34 per treatment arm). Chi-square and t-test were used to evaluate differences in baseline demographics between groups. Objective response was evaluated using mRECIST and toxicity using CTCAE. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in the targeted tumor and the remainder of liver from initial treatment was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Propensity score matching was then performed with n = 24 patients matched in each group. Similar outcome analysis was then pre-formed. RESULTS: In the overall study population, both groups had similar baseline characteristics with the exception of larger lesions in the RS group. There was no difference in toxicity, objective tumor response, OS and non-target liver PFS between the MWA and RS group (p's > 0.05). In the matched cohort, the objective tumor response was 82.6% in MWA vs. 90.9%% in RS (p = 0.548). The mean OS in the MWA group (44.3 months) vs RS (59.0 months; p = 0.203). The targeted tumor mean PFS for the MWA groups was 38.6 months vs. 57.8 months in RS group (p = 0.005). There was no difference overall PFS and toxicity between the 2 matched groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest Y90 RS achieves similar tumor response and OS with a similar safety compared to MWA in the management of HCC lesions ≤ 4 cm. Additionally, targeted tumor PFS appears to be prolonged in the RS group with similar non-target liver PFS between RS and MWA group.

Yttrium-90 dosimetry and implications on tumour response and survival after radioembolisation of chemo-refractory hepatic metastases from breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of tumour dose on tumour response and overall survival (OS) in patients with chemo-refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to the liver undergoing yttrium-90 radioembolisation (Y90 RE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 20 consecutive patients with chemo-refractory MBC to the liver undergoing 33 total Y90 RE resin treatments, volumes of interest were drawn around the five largest tumours of the targeted liver lobe on post-Y90 RE Bremsstrahlung single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography using MIM software v.6.9 (MIM Software, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) and dose-volume histograms were calculated. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) was used to determine tumour response at 3 months. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to determine thresholds for various dosimetry parameters. Kaplan-Meier estimation was used to determine OS. RESULTS: Overall, 11 of 33 (33%) Y90 RE treatments resulted in complete or partial response according to RECIST criteria with a median OS of 20.97 months compared to 11.73 months for nonresponders (P = 0.003). Mean tumour dose, defined as the aggregate tumour dose of up to the five largest tumours in the targeted lobe, was the most predictive of tumour response with the highest area under the ROC curve of 0.967. Mean tumour dose >70 Gy had 91% sensitivity and 100% specificity for predicting tumour response. Patients with mean tumour dose >70 Gy experienced a median OS of 16.1 months vs. 12.8 months for those who did not (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: For patients with chemo-refractory breast cancer with liver metastases, achieving a mean tumour dose >70 Gy is a significant predictor of tumour response and prolonged OS.

Comparison of Tc-99m MAA Planar Versus SPECT/CT Imaging for Lung Shunt Fraction Evaluation Prior to Y-90 Radioembolization: Are We Overestimating Lung Shunt Fraction?

PURPOSE: To compare lung shunt fraction (LSF) prior to Y-90 radioembolization calculated using planar imaging versus SPECT/CT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A single institution retrospective analysis of technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (Tc-99m MAA) LSF studies for 293 consecutive patients with HCC between 2013 and 2018 was performed. LSF using planar imaging (PLSF) was compared to retrospectively calculated LSF using SPECT/CT (SLSF) via semiautomated segmentation using MIM v.6.9. Sub-analyses of patients were performed based on PLSF range, tumor size, BCLC stage, and Child-Pugh (C-P) score. Mean LSF absolute discrepancy between sub-groups was analyzed. Comparisons were performed using paired t tests and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean PLSF, 8.27%, was greater than mean SLSF, 3.27% (p < 0.001). When categorizing patients by PLSF ranges of < 10%, 10-19.9%, and ≥ 20%, PLSF remained greater than SLSF in all subgroups (p's < 0.001). Patients with PLSF ≥ 20% had a greater absolute discrepancy with SLSF (13.31%) compared to patients with PLSF < 20% (4.74%; p < 0.0001). LSF absolute discrepancy was greater for patients with a maximum liver tumor size ≥ 5.0 cm (5.59%) compared to a liver tumor size < 5.0 cm (4.40%; p = 0.0076). For all BCLC grades and C-P scores, PLSF was greater than SLSF. A greater LSF discrepancy existed for patients with a worse C-P score (C-P A: 4.78%, C-P B/C: 6.12%; p = 0.0081), but not BCLC stage (0/A/B: 4.87%, C: 4.56%; p = 0.5993). CONCLUSION: In patients with HCC, SLSF is significantly lower compared to PLSF, with a greater discrepancy among patients with a PLSF ≥ 20%, tumor size ≥ 5 cm, and worse C-P score. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Retrospective Study.