Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 652: 505-512, 2019 Feb 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30368180

RESUMO

Vegetation restoration, terrace and check dam construction are the major measures for soil and water conservation on the Loess Plateau. These effective measures of stabilizing soils have significant impacts on soil organic carbon (SOC) distribution. However, following ecological construction, whether the hilly watershed acts as a source or a sink of soil carbon is still unknown. To understand the impact of land-use changes combined with check dam construction on SOC distribution, 1060 soil samples were collected from a 100 cm soil profile across a watershed on the Loess Plateau. The soils in the 0-20 cm layer had a higher SOC concentration than those of the 20-40, 40-60, 60-80 and 80-100 cm layers. Forestland, shrubland and terrace had significant higher SOC concentrations in the 0-20 cm soil layer than that of sloping cropland and dammed farmland (p < 0.05). SOC densities (0-100 cm) in terrace, forestland, shrubland, grassland, sloping cropland and dammed farmland were 12.09, 11.99, 11.89, 11.77, 11.41 and 10.11 kg m-2, respectively. These estimations suggested that SOC was redistributed in the watershed through land-use changes. Topographical factors, including altitude, aspect and slope had impacts on SOC concentrations. The application of hydrological controls to hillslopes and along river channels should be considered when assessing carbon sequestration within the soil erosion subsystem.

2.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 2972, 2018 02 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29445237

RESUMO

Two contiguous watersheds in the Loess Plateau in China that differed in the way their vegetation had been restored-afforestation or natural revegetation-differed in their consumption of soil moisture: the afforested watershed consumed more soil moisture, although the difference was significant only in wet years. Yet, both the afforestation and natural revegetation did not induce the soil desiccation in the study area. In the afforested watershed, soil moisture was depleted even beyond a depth of 100 cm, whereas in the grassland (natural revegetation), the depletion was confined to a layer less than 60 cm deep. Rainfall in the growing season accounted for 46-60% of the variation in soil moisture in the 0-60 cm layer in the grassland, but only 22-39% of that in the forest land. Overall, afforestation is the better option for the Loess Plateau only in areas where the annual rainfall is more than 500 mm. In any attempt at revegetation, the choice of tree species and planting densities should match the carrying capacity of the region's water resources.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...