Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pain Res ; 13: 919-925, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32440197

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the analgesic effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in combination with celiac plexus block (CPB), relative to SBRT alone, in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed medical records of all patients with LAPC, who received SBRT between 1 January 2017 to 31 August 2019 at our center. The average numeric rating scale (NRS) of ≥3 was used in all patients at admission. We recorded average and worst NRS in a 24-hour period, and daily narcotic doses before SBRT, followed by weekly for 1 month and monthly for 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients in the SBRT group and 12 under SBRT+CPB who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. All patients in the SBRT+CPB group received CPB within 10 days after SBRT. Pain intensity and narcotic consumption were comparable in both groups at initial assessment. However, a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in average NRS was recorded in the SBRT+CPB group relative to SBRT at 2, 3 and 4 weeks after SBRT. A comparison of daily narcotic consumption with baseline values showed a significant decrease in the SBRT+CPB group at 3 and 4 weeks after SBRT (P < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in the SBRT group. CONCLUSION: CPB after SBRT appears to be an effective therapeutic option in patients with LAPC and warrants further evaluation with increased number of patients in prospective clinical trials.

2.
Clin J Pain ; 33(4): 295-299, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27526334

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Literature is limited on the relationship between opiate analgesics and the development of infections in cancer patients. This study aimed to determine whether opiate analgesics contribute to the advancement of infections and how infection rates differ among the various opiates used for cancer management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2013 to October 2014, we analyzed retrospectively 642 consecutive advanced cancer patients who received single types of opiates, including morphine, oxycodone, or fentanyl, or a combination of these drugs, continuously for >14 days. Binominal logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the factors that may promote the development of infections. RESULTS: A total of 303 patients were included in the final analysis. Of these patients, 85, 41, and 68 patients received only morphine, oxycodone, and fentanyl, respectively. Altogether, 87 (28.7%) patients developed infections; 20 (23.5%), 10 (24.4%), and 14 (20.6%) patients developed infections in the groups that received only morphine, oxycodone, and fentanyl, respectively (P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis found that the daily oral morphine equivalent (OME) is the an independent factor that influences the development of infection in the single-opiate group (odds ratio=1.002, P<0.01). The risk for developing infection increased by 2% per 10 mg increase in the daily OME. CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical results did not display any difference among the single-opiate groups in the development of infections. However, the increase in daily OME may serve as a risk factor for the development of infections in advanced cancer patients using one opiate type for pain management.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Infecções/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Fentanila/efeitos adversos , Fentanila/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morfina/efeitos adversos , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Oxicodona/efeitos adversos , Oxicodona/uso terapêutico , Manejo da Dor , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
3.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 33(5): 448-55, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25550408

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify prevalence and severity of nonpain symptoms and to clarify possible influences on each nonpain symptom. METHODS: The study used a descriptive survey design. Chinese version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System was used. Patients' demographic and pain characteristics were collected. RESULTS: The most common symptoms reported were loss of appetite (94.3%) followed by insomnia (93.3%), and tiredness (91.6%). Prevalence rates of nonpain symptom were all above 70% except "thinking clearly." Prevalence and severity of nonpain symptoms varied by gender, age, primary cancer, and pain characteristics, especially intensity, number of breakthrough pain episodes per day, and number of pain sites. CONCLUSIONS: Most inpatients with cancer pain experienced concurrent nonpain symptoms. Comprehensive symptom assessment and intervention managing multiple symptoms are essential for these inpatients.


Assuntos
Dor do Câncer/complicações , Neoplasias/complicações , Cuidados Paliativos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , China , Fadiga/etiologia , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/etiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...