Modified orbitozygomatic craniotomy with a single burr hole in the alternative sphenoid ridge keyhole.

BACKGROUND: One-piece modified orbitozygomatic approach (OZA) is an extended version of the pterional approach that also includes orbital walls and frontal process of the zygomatic bone. For this craniotomy one burr hole must be placed in MacCarty keyhole and another - in the temporal region. OBJECTIVE: To develop a technique of the one-piece modified OZA with single a burr hole in the alternative sphenoid ridge keyhole that allows access to orbit, anterior cranial fossa and middle cranial fossa and apply it intraoperatively. METHODS: A single human head specimen was used. The dissection was performed using standard surgical instruments high-speed Stryker drill. Every stage of the approach was photographed. We also report a surgical case of a patient with orbital cavernous hemangioma that was resected using the described technique. RESULTS: The technique of the one-piece modified OZA with a single burr hole in the alternative sphenoid ridge keyhole is described, and its advantages and limitations are analyzed. The technique is used to totally resect an orbital cavernous hemangioma with good functional and cosmetic result. CONCLUSION: Modified OZA with a single burr hole in the sphenoid ridge keyhole is possible and may be an alternative to the classic technique. The advantages of this variation are the placement of just one burr hole and the preservation of a larger portion of the orbital roof. The latter facilitates better bone reconstruction and better cosmetic outcome. Disadvantages are the difficulty of identifying the location of the sphenoid ridge keyhole and risk of damaging the dura.

Reconstruction of orbital walls after resection of cranioorbital meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Following meningioma removal, there are numerous methods available for reconstructing the orbital wall. This systematic review seeks to summarize the published data on the surgical treatment of cranioorbital meningiomas, and to analyze the effectiveness and safety of various techniques and materials used for the reconstruction of bony orbital walls. We conducted a search of the two databases and included original articles with a series of 10 or more cases. Descriptive statistics and meta-analysis of individual patient date were performed. The analysis included a total of 858 patients from 29 sources. No reconstruction of the orbital walls was performed in 525 patients (61.2%), while 333 observations (38.8%) involved resection followed by reconstruction. A relative improvement in eye position was achieved in 94.4% of cases with a 95% CI of (88.92%; 97.25%). However, normalization of eye position, regardless of reconstruction technique, was only present in 6.22% of cases with a 95% CI of (1.24%; 25.9%). The best results were observed with the use of autologous bone implants (64%, 95% CI [33.35%; 86.33%]) and titanium implants (55.78%, 95% CI [2.86%; 98.18%]). In cases of endoscopic resection and microsurgical resection without reconstruction, symmetrical eye position accounted for only 1.94% (95% CI [0%; 96.71%]) and 2.35% (95% CI [0.13%; 31.23%]), respectively. The frequency of normalization of eye position differed significantly (p < 0.01) among the subgroups. A total of 49 postoperative complications were registered, with wound infection (1.52%, 95% CI [0.86%; 2.65%]) and wound cerebrospinal fluid leak (1.32%, 95% CI [0.6%; 2.91%]) being the most frequent. No significant differences were found in the rates of complications among the different subgroups. One of the primary objectives of cranioorbital meningioma surgery is to correct the position of the eye. Simultaneous reconstruction of the bony orbital leads to better cosmetic outcomes. Postoperative complications did not depend on the reconstructive technique or the materials.

Assessing the reliability of zygomatic bone landmarks as guides to reach the inferior orbital fissure in orbitozygomatic osteotomy: anatomical study of 83 human skulls.

To perform an adequate orbitozygomatic craniotomy, it is very important that the bone cut which passes through the body of the zygoma reaches the inferior orbital fissure (IOF). To reach the IOF, two surface landmarks on the body of the zygoma are described: a point located directly superior to the malar eminence and the zygomaticofacial foramen. The article explores the reliability of these landmarks and three other alternative points to reach the IOF. Eighty-three adult skulls were used in this study. The IOF dimensions and the relationship with the malar eminence, the point superior to the malar eminence, the zygomaticofacial foramen, and 3 alternative points (E, C, F) were analyzed. The malar eminence was unacceptable for use as a guide to the IOF. The point superior to the malar eminence was also unacceptable as a guide as only 9.4% and 10.9% were in the projection of the IOF on the right and left, respectively. 59.7% of the total zygomaticofacial foramina fell in the IOF projection. The point F fell in the projection of the IOF in 98.8% and 100.0% on the right and left, respectively. The use of the malar eminence as a guide to reach the IOF is unreliable in one third of cases as it is not easily identified intraoperatively in these cases. The zygomaticofacial foramen cannot be considered a reliable surgical landmark to reach the IOF. The authors recommend using a novel landmark which may be identified as a midpoint between intersections of the anterior and posterior margins of the zygomatic frontal process on a line extending from the inferior margin of the zygomatic arc. This point is reliable in 98.8-100% of cases.

Recurrent cytogenetic aberrations in histologically benign, invasive meningiomas of the sphenoid region.

Meningiomas that arise in the sphenoid region (MSR) often display growth patterns leading to widespread invasion and destruction of the surrounding structures. Consequently, there is still estimated recurrence rate up to 30% with MSR. Conventional cytogenetic studies have failed to reveal aberrations characteristic of invasive meningiomas. Here we investigated 10 invasive and 5 non-invasive MSR using the array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) with the GenoSensor Array 300. Mean number of aberrations detected per tumor was significantly greater for invasive meningiomas-67.4 compared with 40.5 for non-invasive MSR. Additionally, invasive MSR disclosed frequent losses on 1p, 6q, 14q and gains on 15q and 20, which were identified previously as molecular hallmarks of stepwise meningioma progression. Thus, the presence of a complex cytogenetic profile and progression-associated chromosomal aberrations in benign MSR is associated with their increased invasive potential. Inasmuch as no reliable adjuvant therapy for recurrent meningiomas is available thus far, revealed genomic aberrations can provide a potential targets for drug discovery and therapeutic intervention in a future.