RESUMO
AIM: The aim of the study is to compare the efficiency of six-stranded coaxial tubular superelastic nickel-titanium (NiTi) archwire and a single-stranded wire in relieving anterior mandibular crowding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This double-blind randomized study included 40 patients, categorized into two groups: Sentalloy round group and Speed tubular supercable group (20 each). After taking alginate impressions, the allocated archwire was engaged. With a digital caliper, intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar width were recorded on the study models, immediately and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks stages. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was used for analysis. RESULTS: The measured parameters were increased in both the groups, with the difference being insignificant statistically. CONCLUSION: Superelastic coaxial NiTi wires show better efficiency in relieving anterior crowding than single-stranded NiTi wire.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare the alignment efficiency of coaxial tubular and single-stranded 0.016" superelastic NiTi archwires in relieving mandibular anterior crowding in extraction cases and to evaluate whether alignment efficiency differed as the initial irregularity increased. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Forty female patients aged between twelve and twenty years from the postgraduate orthodontic clinic at the authors' centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients in this single-centre, 2-arm parallel trial were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio and the mandibular anterior irregularity was measured from the mandibular cast at 0-, 4-, 8- and 12-week intervals using a digital calliper. RESULTS: All forty patients (mean age, 15.08 ± 2.11) completed the study with either coaxial tubular superelastic NiTi (mean age, 15.30 ± 2.36) or single-stranded superelastic NiTi (mean age, 14.85 ± 1.84). The largest mean irregularity index reduction of -4.88 ± 2.74 and -6.17 ± 2.38 in the single-stranded superelastic NiTi and the coaxial tubular superelastic NiTi groups, respectively (P = 0.122) was at 4 weeks. Student's t test and repeated measures ANOVA indicated that none of the mean comparisons were statistically significant at a 5% level. Pearson's correlation value (r) indicated no statistically significant influence of initial crowding on alignment efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference between the alignment efficiency of coaxial tubular superelastic NiTi and single-stranded superelastic NiTi in extraction cases, and the degree of initial crowding had no influence on the alignment efficiency.
