Assessment of Patient Adherence to Direct Oral Anticoagulant vs Warfarin Therapy.

CONTEXT: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be as effective as, and at times safer than, warfarin. Because DOACs do not require regular serum level monitoring, patients' interaction with the health care system may be reduced. To the authors' knowledge, although studies have evaluated warfarin adherence, few studies have evaluated the real-world adherence to DOACs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a difference exists between medication adherence of patients taking DOACs vs patients taking warfarin. METHODS: The electronic medical records of the Anticoagulation Clinic database at Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona, were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were adults taking DOACs and a matching cohort taking warfarin between January 1, 2011, and December 30, 2013. The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 item, a validated medication adherence tool, was used to evaluate adherence in both cohorts, and the qualitative covariates were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 324 surveys that were sent, 110 patients (34.0%) responded. Most patients took DOACs for atrial fibrillation, and few took DOACs for venous thromboembolism. Overall, 60 of 66 patients (90.9%) in the DOAC group and 42 of 44 patients (95.5%) in the warfarin group reported medium or high adherence. Difference in adherence scores between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P=.8). CONCLUSION: Similar adherence was noted between DOACs and warfarin regardless of the frequency of serum level monitoring.

A surprising cause of masses in the chest.

An 82-year-old male presented to the emergency department with an acute onset of chest pain and mild shortness of breath at rest. The pain in his left lower chest was pleuritic with intensity 9- on a 10-point scale. He had driven 2 h in his car that day, but had no other prolonged immobility. About 15 years previously, he was found to have increased hemoglobin (18.1 g/dL) and diagnosed with secondary erythrocytosis due to active smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and residence in Payson, Arizona (altitude 4,999 ft). Polycythemia vera was entertained, but not pursued due to multiple secondary risks. He had been treated with daily aspirin and monthly phlebotomies to maintain a hematocrit below 45%. He also had a history of superficial thrombophlebitis, nephrolithiasis, hypertension and superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder resected and in remission. There was also a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) 13 years previously, believed to be provoked by prolonged immobility after a radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer now in remission. His medications were aspirin and lisinopril; he had no known drug allergies. He quit smoking 2 years prior after a 70 pack-year history. There was no other family history of thrombosis or bleeding disorder, autoimmune disorders, pulmonary disease or malignancy.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myeloproliferative neoplasm in blast phase.

The prognosis for patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) who evolve into acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or blast phase (MPN-BP) is extremely poor. Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is considered potentially curative, very few patients have been reported who have undergone allo-SCT for MPN-BP; therefore the success rate remains unknown. In a retrospective review, we identified 13 patients with an MPN transformation to blast phase after a median 9 years (range 5 months to 30 years); 8 (median age 55) continued to allo-SCT within 6 months. Induction chemotherapy cleared blood/marrow blasts in 60% (6/10) (2 declined therapy, 1 had early death). At the time of allo-SCT, 5/8 patients were in complete remission (CR) of their leukemia or had returned to MPN chronic phase (CP), 2 had residual blood blasts and 1 was refractory with >5% marrow blasts. At follow-up (median 20.3 months), 6 patients are alive in CR of both their leukemia/MPN. All 5 patients in CR/CP at pre-allo-SCT remain alive in remission, while 2/3 with persistent blood/marrow blasts relapsed and expired. We conclude that MPN-BP can be cured by allo-SCT in a significant percentage of patients, but that adequate leukemic clearance prior to allo-SCT offers an optimal outcome.