Bilateral pulmonary embolism associated with peripheral blood eosinophilia and positive antiphospholipid antibodies in a patient with cellulitis.

Key Clinical Message: This report described the pathophysiology, diagnostic workup, and management of thrombosis possibly associated with peripheral blood eosinophilia and transient positive antiphospholipid antibodies in the setting of cellulitis. Abstract: Peripheral blood eosinophilia is a risk factor for thrombosis and the presence of other prothrombotic factors such as antiphospholipid antibodies can potentiate that risk. The authors present a case of acute pulmonary embolism which developed at the peak of eosinophilia, later found to have transient positive antiphospholipid antibodies in a male patient with right lower limb cellulitis and a history of intravenous drug abuse. This report illustrates the pathophysiology, diagnosis workup, and therapeutic options of thrombosis possibly associated with peripheral blood eosinophilia and positive antiphospholipid antibodies, which include anticoagulants, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants. Clinicians should be aware of this possible association which may guide the choice and duration of anticoagulants. Although direct oral anticoagulants are effective anticoagulants in various thromboembolic events, studies showed unfavorable outcomes for their use in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Conduction system pacing: promoting the physiology to prevent heart failure.

Cardiac conduction system pacing provides physiological ventricular activation by directly stimulating the conduction system. This review describes the two types of conduction system pacing: His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle area pacing (LBAP). The most significant advantage of HB pacing is that it can provide a regular, narrow QRS; however, the disadvantages are challenging implantation and a high risk of re-intervention due to lead dislodgement and the development of high pacing threshold. LBAP provides optimum physiological activation of the left ventricle by engaging the left bundle/fascicular fibers. LBAP is more physiological than traditional RV apical pacing and could be an attractive alternative to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The advantages of LBAP are a relatively more straightforward implantation technique than HBP, better lead stability and pacing thresholds. HBP and LBAP are more physiological than right ventricular pacing and may be used instead of conventional pacemakers. Both HBP and LBBP are being investigated as alternatives to conventional CRT.