CHaMP: A Model for Building a Center to Support Health Care Worker Well-Being After Experiencing an Adverse Event.

BACKGROUND: With an already distressed health care workforce demonstrating high levels of burnout, depression, and suicide, access to behavioral health care, particularly after an adverse event, is critical. Unfortunately, clinicians identify multiple barriers to seeking behavioral support. In 2022 the National Academy of Medicine, in its National Plan for Health Workforce Well-Being, established "Support Mental Health and Reduce Stigma" as one of its seven priority areas. FRAMEWORK: The authors developed a program called CHaMP (Center for Healthy Minds and Practice) guided by a multidisciplinary task force that developed the vision, plan, and algorithms to improve crisis response; build a peer support program; and remove barriers to accessing mental health care by establishing an on-campus behavioral health support center. This program was implemented using Kotter's 8-step Model of Change. RESULTS: Within the first months of establishing this program, the support team responded to multiple activations of the crisis response plan, built a peer support program, and provided counseling services to 631 employees. During the COVID-19 pandemic, CHaMP played a central role in the support of all employees. CONCLUSION: This program and its implementation based on Kotter's 8-Step Model of Change was a powerful and practical methodology to design and implement interventions to address system and individual factors that affect clinician well-being and resilience after an adverse event.

Dimensions of hospital workplace violence: Patient violence towards the healthcare team.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the cognitive dimensions nurses use when perceiving patient-to-healthcare provider workplace violence. BACKGROUND: The concept of workplace violence, especially with respect to healthcare settings, has been well documented. Healthcare workers are at particular risk for experiencing violence from their patients, though these incidents often go unreported. Experiencing violence in the workplace has been associated with numerous negative outcomes, including absenteeism, burnout and diminished quality of care. However, little emphasis has been placed on understanding the concept of violence itself, or why one type of violence might go unreported whilst another is readily communicated to officials. DESIGN: A card-sorting, multidimensional scaling design. METHODS: Thirty two nurses completed the card-sorting task. Using multidimensional scaling (MDS), 75 reported incidents of violence were considered. SPIRIT research reporting checklist followed. RESULTS: Nurses categorise patient violence in three dimensions: physical versus verbal, active versus threatening and more versus less severe. Implications for further research and intervention are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Violence in the hospital workplace is a complex perception by the healthcare worker that cannot be captured by a single dimension. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study provides a theoretical framework for understanding the complexity of patient-to-provider violence in a hospital setting. It sheds light on why only a minority of such events are reported. This model can serve as a foundation for future research exploring interventions for hospital violence.

Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (MILE): technique and outcomes of 100 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is the mainstay of therapy for esophageal cancer but is a complex operation that is associated with significantly high morbidity and mortality rates. The primary aim of this study is to report our perioperative outcomes, and long-term survival of Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (MILE). METHODS: IRB approved retrospective study of 100 consecutive patients who underwent elective MILE from September 2013 to November 2017 at University of Florida, Jacksonville. RESULTS: Primary diagnosis was esophageal cancer (n = 96) and benign esophageal disease (n = 4). Anastomotic leak rate was observed in 6%; 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 2% and 3%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 10.3 days; 87 patients were discharged to home, while 12 patients were discharged to rehabilitation facility, and there was one in-hospital mortality secondary to graft necrosis. At a mean follow-up was 37 months (2-74), the 3- and 5-year overall survivals are 63.9 ± 5.0% (95% CI 53.3-72.7%) and 60.5 ± 5.3% (95% CI 49.4-69.9%), respectively. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival is 75.0 ± 4.8% (95% CI 64.2-83.0%) and 70.4 ± 5.5% (95% CI 58.0-80.0%). CONCLUSION: MILE can be performed with low perioperative mortality, and favorable long-term overall and disease-free survival.

Psychological Prophylaxis: An Integrated Psychological Services Program in Trauma Care.

The primary medical goals of acute care are restoration of physical health and return to physical function. However, in response to traumatic events and injuries, psychological factors are critical to one's overall recovery. Both pre-morbid psychiatric comorbidities and post-injury psychological compromise affect physical and psychological recovery in inpatient trauma populations. The Psychological Services Program (PSP), a model trauma/acute care program, addresses these critical factors in a Level 1 Trauma Center. The program routinely treats over one-quarter of the trauma patients at any given time. The incorporation of the PSP into treatment team care ensures that patients in need of mental health support can be identified and treated during their recovery. This unique model is recommended as a potential injury prevention and recovery intervention strategy for the myriad mental health comorbidities that may function as risk factors for poor post-injury adaptation and also as risk factors for possible future traumatic injury.

Nursing Professional Development Anti-Bullying Project.

This article describes a nursing professional development, evidence-based intervention project addressing the significant problem of bullying in the nursing workplace. The project entailed a 9-week, multitiered approach to teach behaviors to combat bullying and create the self-efficacy to do so. Results demonstrated statistically significant t-test comparisons of pre- and postsurvey measures, supporting the clinical question that empowerment and perceptual change drove individual and group behavior to confront bullying and create a positive culture shift.

Comparative Analysis of State Trauma Triage Criteria vs. Paramedic Discretion.

OBJECTIVE: The Florida Adult Trauma Triage Criteria (FATTC) define specific parameters concerning injury mechanism and physiologic data that prompt paramedics to initiate a trauma alert and necessitate transport to a trauma center. In the state of Florida, paramedics are also given discretion to bring patients to the trauma center who do not meet those criteria. Our aim was to compare the injury characteristics and outcomes of adult patients who were evaluated in our trauma center after activation due to FATTC criteria vs. paramedic discretion (PD) and to identify predictors of PD. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients 18 years and older evaluated in our trauma center from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2014. Descriptive statistics were computed for all variables. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare demographic, injury severity, and outcome differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 13,963 patients met FATTC during the study period, and 1,811 were brought in by PD. PD patients had lower injury severity and crude mortality. Regression modeling of demographic and injury variables found that only the combination of older age and higher heart rate predicted PD when both were lower than FATTC alone. CONCLUSIONS: While PD patients were less seriously injured and had lower mortality, they experienced similar lengths of stay and resource utilization after presentation. Paramedics may be able to identify patients at risk for poor outcomes who would otherwise not be captured by FATTC.

How Safe Is the Safety Net? Comparison of Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy at a Safety-Net Hospital Using the NSQIP Database.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that surgical outcomes at hospitals caring for low-income, vulnerable populations are suboptimal compared with outcomes from nonsafety-net hospitals. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to compare outcomes for patients who underwent an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at a safety-net hospital with the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, between September 2013 and January 2017, at a single safety-net hospital. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared with the 2013 to 2015 NSQIP database. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test, and categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: We identified 78 patients from the safety-net hospital and 1,825 patients in the NSQIP database who underwent an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Baseline characteristics were similar, except the safety-net hospital patients were more likely to have COPD (19.2% vs 8.1%; p = 0.001) and be current smokers (42.3% vs 26.0%; p = 0.001); patients in the NSQIP group had a higher BMI (28 kg/m2 vs 26 kg/m2; p = 0.001). There were no differences between groups for mortality, readmission, discharge destination, or mean operative time. Safety-net hospital patients had significantly fewer complications (16.7% vs 33.3%; p = 0.003), fewer reoperations (6.4% vs 14.5%; p = 0.046), and shorter hospital length of stay (10.3 vs 13.1 days; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at a safety-net hospital had fewer complications and reoperations, and a shorter hospital length of stay compared with a national cohort. These findings illustrate the value of clinical pathways in optimizing the patient outcomes at safety-net hospitals and providing excellent care to their vulnerable patient population.

An evaluation of trauma outcomes related to insurance status in patients requiring prehospital helicopter transport.

INTRODUCTION: Disparities in access to medical care and outcomes of medical treatment related to insurance status are documented. However, little attention has been given to the effect of health care funding status on outcomes in trauma patients. Hypothesis/Problem This study evaluated if adult trauma patients who arrived by air transport to a trauma center had different clinical outcomes based on their health insurance status. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of all adult trauma patients arriving by prehospital flight services to a Level I Trauma Center over a 5-year period. Patients were classified as unfunded or funded based on health insurance status. Injury severity scores (ISS) were compared, while the end points evaluated in the study included duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), duration of hospitalization, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,877 adult patients met inclusion criteria for the study, with 14% (n = 259) classified as unfunded and 86% (n = 1,618) classified as funded. Unfunded patients compared to funded patients had a significantly lower average ISS (12.82 vs 15.56; P < .001) but a significantly higher mortality rate (16.6% vs 10.7%; P < .01) and a 1.54 relative risk of death (95% CI, 1.136-2.098). Neither mean ICU stay (3.44 days vs 4.98 days; P = .264) nor duration of hospitalization (11.18 days vs 13.34 days; P = .382) was significantly different when controlling for ISS. CONCLUSION: Unfunded health insurance status is associated with worse outcomes following less significant injury. Further investigation of baseline health disparities for identification and early intervention may improve outcomes. Additionally, these findings may have implications for the health systems of other countries that lack universal health care coverage.

Proficiency of surgical faculty and residents with ethical dilemmas: is modeling enough?

OBJECTIVE: Professionalism, an Accreditation Commission for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competency, embraces the concept of adherence to ethical principles. Despite this, most surgical residencies do not currently include ethics as part of their core curriculum. Further, expertise in effectively managing ethical dilemmas is frequently obtained via modeling after the attending physician. This study evaluated surgical faculty (SF) and residents (SR) on their understanding of basic ethical principles and their overall confidence in translation of these principles into clinical practice. The objective was to determine if there are any differences in the overall levels of knowledge and confidence in ethics between SR and SF. DESIGN AND SETTING: Immediately before the first session of a Kamangar Grant supported monthly Ethics Forum, all SF and SR completed a Pre-Curriculum Questionnaire (PCQ) on their knowledge about ethical principles and their confidence in dealing with ethical issues. PQC contained 13 multiple-choice and true/false knowledge questions and 8 questions evaluating confidence rated on a 5-point Likert scale. PARTICIPANTS: Surgical faculty (SF) (n = 16) and SR (n = 36). Knowledge and confidence scores were compared between SR and SF, using Student t-test analysis to evaluate differences between groups. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in ethical knowledge scores between faculty and residents. Faculty confidence is higher than resident (p < 0.05). Further, female faculty confidence is higher than that of their male counterparts (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: While SF are more confident in their ethical decision-making, their fundamental knowledge base in ethics is not different from that of SR. Female SF report greater self-confidence over their male counterparts. In total, SF may not possess the foundation to effectively mentor residents in appropriate ethical principles and their translation to clinical practice. This study supports the need for both SR and SF to engage in an integrated education program in ethics to promote on-going dialogue in this complex topic.