Pre-treatment optimisation with pulmonary rehabilitation of elderly lung cancer patients with frailty for surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Frailty develops as a result of age-related decline in many physiological systems and is associated with increased vulnerability to adverse outcomes following thoracic surgery. We prospectively tested our hypothesis that pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation (Prehab) improves frailty, as suggested by a frailty index > 3 (FI > 3) and fitness, and thereby reduces the risk of post-surgical complications and death in vulnerable elderly lung cancer patients. METHODS: 221 surgical patients, 80 with FI > 3 vs. 141 patients with FI < 3, following Prehab proceeded to surgery. Their Frailty index (FI), dyspnoea scores, performance status (PS), level of activity (LOA) and six-minute walk test (6MWT) prior to and following Prehab were determined. The post-operative length of hospital stay (LOHS), complications, mortality and mid-term survival at 1100 days were compared. Similarly, outcomes for elderly patient ≥ 70 years with FI > 3 (≥ 70,FI > 3) were compared with younger patients < 70 years with FI ≤ 3 (< 70,FI ≤ 3). RESULTS: Patients with FI > 3 were significantly older, had lower 6MWT and higher thoracoscores hence, 82.5% of patients with FI > 3 vs. 33.3% (p = 0.02) with FI ≤ 3 were considered high risk for surgery and postoperative adverse events. With Prehab there was significant improvement in the FI, dyspnoea scores, PS, LOA and 6MWT. Following surgery, there were no differences in major complication rates (8.8% vs. 9.2% p = ns); LOHS median (IQR) [7 (6.8) vs. 8 (5.5) days]; mortality at 30-days (3.7% vs. 0.7%, p = ns); 90-days (6.3% vs. 2.8%, p = ns) and 1-year survival (81.1% vs. 83.7% p = ns). Survival at 1100 days was (63.2% vs. 71.1%, p = 0.19). Likewise, 87.7% elderly ≥ 70,FI > 3 patients were considered high-risk for surgery and postoperative adverse events vs. 35.1% younger patients < 70,FI ≤ 3 (p = 0.0001). Following Prehab and surgery, there were no significant differences in complications, LOHS, mortality at 365 days between the two groups. Survival at 1100 days for ≥ 70,FI > 3 was 55.2% vs. 79.96% for < 70,FI ≤ 3; (p = 0,01). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that Prehab optimises vulnerable high-risk elderly lung cancer patients with frailty allowing them to undergo surgery with outcomes of post-surgical complications, LOHS and mortality at 365 days no different to patients with no frailty. However, mid-term survival was lower for elderly patients with frailty.

Pre-treatment optimization with pulmonary rehabilitation in lung cancer: Making the inoperable patients operable.

BACKGROUND: Anatomical lung resection offers the best prospect of long-term survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, some patients with significant dyspnoea, impaired performance status (PS), borderline or poor pulmonary function are considered inoperable and instead referred for radiotherapy, chemotherapy or palliative care. The aims of the study were to determine whether pre-operative pulmonary physiotherapy (Prehab), by improving clinical parameters, (i) makes patients suitable for surgery who were considered inoperable on subjective criteria of dyspnoea >3 and PS >2, and objective criteria of diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) <50%; and (ii) thereby allows them to safely receive curative surgery with reduced morbidity and mortality. METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2018 a total of 306 patients were prospectively and sequentially assessed for Prehab and 216 patients with lung cancer studied. Their mean age (95% CI) was 71.7 ± 1.1 years, 50.5% (n = 109) were men and they received Prehab over 39.0 ± 7.0 days averaging 3.1 ± 0.6 sessions. Their dyspnoea scores, PS, level of activity, six minute walk test (6MWT) and frailty index prior to and following Prehab were determined. Following surgery the post-operative length of hospital stay (LOHS), complications and mortality at 30 days, 90 days and 1 year determined. Similar outcomes were determined for (i) high-risk patients with dyspnoea scores >3 and PS >2, and compared with low-risk patients having dyspnoea scores <2 and PS <2 (subjective criteria); and (ii) high-risk patients with DLCO <50% and compared with low-risk patients with DLCO >80% (objective criteria). FINDINGS: In the total cohort following Prehab, there was significant improvement in the dyspnoea scores <2 / ≥2 (40%/60% prior to Prehab vs. 65%/35% following Prehab, p = 0.00002), PS <2 / ≥2 (45%/55% prior to vs. 62%/38% following Prehab, p = 0.003), frailty index ≤3 / >3 (49%/51% vs 70%/30%, p = 0.0006), and 6MWT (306.6 ± 6.8 m vs 354.8 ± 52.7 m, p = 0.04). Post-operative major complication rates were 8.7%; median LOHS was 7 (IQR 6) days; hospital mortality at 30 days 1.3%, 90 days 4.7% and 1 year 16%. Using subjective criteria of dyspnoea scores >3 and PS >2, 100% of high-risk patients were considered inoperable. Following optimization with Prehab 84.2% of the high-risk patients were ready to proceed with radical treatment and 52.6% with surgery, and subsequently 42.8% of patients underwent surgery. Likewise, 78.8% of patients with DLCO <50% were considered inoperable. Following Prehab 86.5% of high-risk patients were ready to proceed with radical treatment and 59.1% with surgery, and 54.6% of high-risk patients underwent surgery. In each category there were no significant differences in complications, LOHS or mortality rates between the high-risk and low-risk patients. INTERPRETATION: Our prospective study showed that with Prehab there was clinical and statistically significant improvement in the dyspnoea scores, PS, level of activity and frailty, particularly in the high-risk group of patients. Importantly, Prehab made previously inoperable patients operable, allowing them to safely undergo curative lung resection. This strategy helps improve resection rates and may contribute to the long term survival of lung cancer patients. FUNDING: This is a Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee (WHSSC) commissioned service.

Impact of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation on the Thoracoscore of patients undergoing lung resection.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with dyspnoea who are suitable for lung resection have a higher in-hospital mortality following surgery as predicted by the Thoracoscore. We evaluated the role of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PPR) in improving preoperative dyspnoea, performance status and thereby the Thoracoscore and reducing the risk of postoperative mortality, complications and length of stay in such patients. METHODS: From June 2013 until May 2014, we prospectively and sequentially identified high-risk patients in our outpatient clinic with dyspnoea grade ≥2 and performance status ≥1 for lung resection and recruited them for PPR. Thoracoscores, dyspnoea grade and performance status before and after PPR were calculated for all patients. Hospital mortality, complication rates and the length of hospital stay following surgery were compared between those who received PPR with those who did not undergo PPR and instead went straight to surgery. RESULTS: Of the 42 patients (67% females, mean age 67 years [SD 13]) identified, 33 patients received PPR for a mean duration of 7.1 [SD 6.5] days. Their mean Thoracoscores before and after PPR were 6.4 [SD 5.1] and 1.7% [SD 1.3] (P < 0.00009); dyspnoea grade 3.8 [SD 0.6] and 2.2 [SD 0.6] (P < 0.00001); and performance status 2.7 [SD 0.5] and 1.7 [SD 0.6] (P < 0.00001), respectively. The postoperative mortality in those who received PPR and those who did not undergo PPR but went straight to surgery, respectively, was 0 vs 11.1% (P = 0.05), postoperative complication rate was 5.3 vs 37.5% (P < 0.015) and the mean length of hospital stay was 8.7 [SD 3.5] days vs 10.3 [SD 6.2] days (P = 0.26), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our prospective study suggests that in those patients with dyspnoea requiring lung resection, PPR significantly improves their exercise capacity, reduces dyspnoea and improves the Thoracoscore. The study also suggests that PPR helps reduce postoperative complications and obviates the increased length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality that may be otherwise expected.