Immunotherapy induced enterocolitis and gastritis - What to do and when?

Oncological treatment has been revolutionised by the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi), which block inhibitory immune pathways to enhance anti-tumour responses and improve survival. This mode of action is non-specific so can cause immune-related adverse events, of which diarrhoea and enterocolitis are amongst the most common. ICPi-enterocolitis frequently leads to cancer therapy interruption. ICPi-gastritis typically occurs at a later stage of ICPi therapy and can present more insidiously with nausea and vomiting. ICPi-enterocolitis and gastritis are treated with corticosteroids, with refractory cases typically requiring biologic therapy. This review will briefly consider the pathogenesis of ICPi-induced GI disease, before focussing on the practical management of these conditions. The anticipated global increase in ICPi use across cancer types highlights the importance of prospective research in order that we can understand the immuno-microbiology of ICPi-enterocolitis and gastritis. This will lead to predictive biomarkers and help to define optimal treatment regimens.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related colitis assessment and prognosis: can IBD scoring point the way?

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve survival but cause immune-related adverse events (irAE). We sought to determine if CTCAE classification, IBD biomarkers/endoscopic/histological scores correlate with irAE colitis outcomes. METHODS: A dual-centre retrospective study was performed on patients receiving ICI for melanoma, NSCLC or urothelial cancer from 2012 to 2018. Demographics, clinical data, endoscopies (reanalysed using Mayo/Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) scores), histology (scored with Nancy Index) and treatment outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: In all, 1074 patients were analysed. Twelve percent (134) developed irAE colitis. Median patient age was 66, 59% were male. CTCAE diarrhoea grade does not correlate with steroid/ infliximab use. G3/4 colitis patients are more likely to need infliximab (p < 0.0001) but colitis grade does not correlate with steroid duration. CRP, albumin and haemoglobin do not correlate with severity. The UCEIS (p = 0.008) and Mayo (p = 0.016) scores correlate with severity/infliximab requirement. Patients with higher Nancy indices (3/4) are more likely to require infliximab (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: CTCAE assessment does not accurately reflect colitis severity and our data do not support its use in isolation, as this may negatively impact timely management. Our data support utilising endoscopic scoring for patients with >grade 1 CTCAE disease, and demonstrate the potential prognostic utility of objective histologic scoring.