RESUMO
Background: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer among women in developed countries. Sono-elastography is an extended ultrasonographic technique that has been shown to be useful in a wide range of conditions ranging from breast, prostate, and thyroid nodules to chronic liver disease and musculoskeletal conditions. The aim of this study is to compare the sonoelastographic features of endometrial malignancy and normal endometrium. Methods: This case-control observational study was conducted at a single institution. Participants with histologically proven endometrial cancer according to the results from microcurettage or hysteroscopic biopsy and scheduled for total hysterectomy were included as cases, while asymptomatic women scheduled for routine screening ultrasound examination were recruited as controls. Both cases and controls underwent conventional B-mode transvaginal ultrasonography and strain elastography. Demographic, ultrasonographic, and histopathologic findings were analyzed. Results: A total of 29 endometrial cancer patients (cases) and 28 normal females (controls) were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in the mean age between the two groups, but the mean body weight was significantly higher in the case group (P < 0.001). The strain ratio and elastographic thickness ratio of the endometrium were statistically significantly different between the case and the control group (P ≤ 0.05) due to increased endometrial stiffness in cancer patients as compared to the normal group. Conclusion: Our results suggest that endometrial cancer can result in increased stiffness that is detectable by transvaginal sonoelastography. Sonoelastography may serve as an adjunct to conventional ultrasound in evaluating the endometrium of women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
RESUMO
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To measure the effect of explicit prevalence expectation on the performance of experienced radiologists during image interpretation of pulmonary lesions on chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each of 22 experienced radiologists was allocated to one of three groups to interpret a set of 30 (15 abnormal) posteroanterior chest images on two occasions to decide if pulmonary lesions were present. Before each viewing, the radiologists were told that the images contained a specific number of abnormal images: group 1, 9 versus 15; group 2, 22 versus 15; and group 3, not told versus 15, respectively. Eye position metrics and receiver operating characteristics confidence ratings were compared for normal and abnormal images. An analysis of false-positive and false-negative decisions was also performed. RESULTS: For normal images, at higher prevalence expectation, significant increases were noted for duration of image scrutiny (group 1: P = .0004; group 2: P = .007; and group 3: P = .003) and number of fixations per image (group 1: P = .0006; group 2: P = .0004; and group 3: P = .0001). Also for normal images, group 1 demonstrated a significant increase (P = .038) in average confidence ratings when prevalence expectation increased. For abnormal images, at higher prevalence expectation, significant increases were noted for duration of image scrutiny in group 1 (P = .005) and number of fixations per image in group 1 (P = .01) and group 2 (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Confidence ratings and visual search of the expert radiologists appear to be affected by changing prevalence expectations. The impact of prevalence expectation appears to be more apparent for normal images.
