RESUMO
Background: There is a scarcity of reported data on the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in sub-Saharan Africa. Objectives: To undertake AF screening in semi-rural Ethiopia. Methods: The TEFF-AF (The hEart oF Ethiopia: Focus on Atrial Fibrillation) study conducted AF screening using a single-lead electrocardiogram device (KardiaMobile) on willing community participants at the Soddo Christian Hospital, Ethiopia. Participants' clinical parameters and medical history were obtained to characterize their risk factor profile, including calculation of CHARGE-AF (Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Atrial Fibrillation) score. Results: A total of 3000 Ethiopians (median 31 [interquartile range 25-41] years of age; 65% men) were screened. The participants were generally well educated, from the local region and with a low burden of cardiovascular risk factors. A total of 50 participants had a CHARGE-AF score (5-year AF risk) of ≥2%. AF was detected in 13 (0.43%) individuals (median 50 [interquartile range 36-60] years of age; n = 7 men). The prevalence among participants over 40 years of age was 1% (n = 9 of 930). AF prevalence was higher for older age groups, with ≥70 years of age reaching 6.67% (n = 3 of 45). Population prevalence was estimated to be 234 (95% confidence interval 7-460) per 10,000 persons for ≥60 years of age. Four (31%) of the 13 participants with AF had a CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) score of ≥2, and others likely had rheumatic valvular AF, but only 2 of the 13 participants with AF were on oral anticoagulation therapy. Conclusion: In this semi-rural Ethiopian community of relatively younger participants, AF prevalence was found to be low but increased with increasing age. Mobile single-lead electrocardiogram technology can be used effectively for AF screening in low-resource settings.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) screening using mobile single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) devices has demonstrated variable sensitivity and specificity. However, limited data exists on the use of such devices in low-resource countries. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research was to evaluate the utility of the KardiaMobile device's (AliveCor Inc) automated algorithm for AF screening in a semirural Ethiopian population. METHODS: Analysis was performed on 30-second single-lead ECG tracings obtained using the KardiaMobile device from 1500 TEFF-AF (The Heart of Ethiopia: Focus on Atrial Fibrillation) study participants. We evaluated the performance of the KardiaMobile automated algorithm against cardiologists' interpretations of 30-second single-lead ECG for AF screening. RESULTS: A total of 1709 single-lead ECG tracings (including repeat tracing on 209 occasions) were analyzed from 1500 Ethiopians (63.53% [953/1500] male, mean age 35 [SD 13] years) who presented for AF screening. Initial successful rhythm decision (normal or possible AF) with one single-lead ECG tracing was lower with the KardiaMobile automated algorithm versus manual verification by cardiologists (1176/1500, 78.40%, vs 1455/1500, 97.00%; P<.001). Repeat single-lead ECG tracings in 209 individuals improved overall rhythm decision, but the KardiaMobile automated algorithm remained inferior (1301/1500, 86.73%, vs 1479/1500, 98.60%; P<.001). The key reasons underlying unsuccessful KardiaMobile automated rhythm determination include poor quality/noisy tracings (214/408, 52.45%), frequent ectopy (22/408, 5.39%), and tachycardia (>100 bpm; 167/408, 40.93%). The sensitivity and specificity of rhythm decision using KardiaMobile automated algorithm were 80.27% (1168/1455) and 82.22% (37/45), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the KardiaMobile automated algorithm was suboptimal when used for AF screening. However, the KardiaMobile single-lead ECG device remains an excellent AF screening tool with appropriate clinician input and repeat tracing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001107112; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=378057&isReview=true.
