Cefixime vs. cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media in children: a randomized, comparative study.

The efficacy of cefixime was compared with that of cefaclor in the treatment of 63 patients with acute otitis media. Patients received either a single dose of cefixime (8 mg/kg/day) or 3 divided doses of cefaclor (40 mg/kg/day). On the basis of otoscopic and tympanometric results at 10 to 14 days after the start of treatment, 28 (97%) of 29 cefixime-treated patients and 25 (78%) of 32 cefaclor-treated patients had resolution of acute otitis media. The clinical cure rate associated with all organisms was 94% for cefixime (16 of 17 isolates) and 68% (13 of 19 isolates) for cefaclor. The cure rate for Streptococcus pneumoniae was 12 of 12 (100%) for cefixime and 7 of 7 (100%) for cefaclor; the cure rate for Haemophilus influenzae (which includes 2 patients with mixed infections) was 3 of 4 (75%) for cefixime and 2 of 7 (29%) for cefaclor. One clinical relapse occurred among 29 cefixime-treated patients; however, at 28 days 9 recurrences were observed. Three of 25 (9%) cefaclor-treated patients failed and 4 (13%) relapsed at 10 to 14 days, an additional 2 (10%) experienced recurrence by Day 28. Eight (28%) cefixime-treated patients experienced adverse events (7 gastrointestinal and 1 diarrhea and rash); 8 (25%) cefaclor-treated patients experienced adverse events (all gastrointestinal). Our data suggest that both at end of therapy and for 14 days thereafter, cefixime given once a day for acute otitis media is clinically equivalent to cefaclor given 3 times a day.

Sultamicillin (sulbactam/ampicillin) versus amoxycillin in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.

A comparative study of sultamicillin (an orally active dimer of sulbactam and ampicillin) and amoxycillin for the treatment of acute otitis media was carried out in 86 children with acute otitis media. After 10 days' treatment, of those with traditional middle ear pathogens, 35/36 (97%) 50 mg/kg.day or 500 mg/day sultamicillin-treated children were cured with eight relapses after a further 18 days without treatment compared with 12/13 (92%) 40 mg/kg.day or 250 mg/day amoxycillin-treated children and three subsequent relapses. All six beta-lactamase-producing pathogens were in the sultamicillin treatment group: four were Haemophilus influenzae/H. parainfluenzae that were resistant to amoxycillin, and all were cured although two then relapsed. No significant clinical or laboratory side-effects were noted in either amoxycillin- or sultamicillin-treated patients. It is concluded that sultamicillin was comparable to amoxycillin in the treatment of acute otitis media.

Erythromycin-sulfisoxazole vs amoxicillin in the treatment of acute otitis media in children. A double-blind, multiple-dose comparative study.

A fixed combination of erythromycin ethylsuccinate and sulfisoxazole acetyl (erythromycin-sulfa) was compared with amoxicillin for the treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) in children. Of 145 patients studied, 76 boys and 69 girls were compliant and were evaluated for drug efficacy (72 amoxicillin, 73 erythromycin-sulfa). Based on otoscopic and tympanometric results, cure rates at ten to 14 days for AOM due to all organisms were 83% (63/72) for amoxicillin and 89% (65/73) for erythromycin-sulfa; for Haemophilus species (including mixed infections), they were 84% for amoxicillin (26/31) and 83% for erythromycin-sulfa (20/14). Cure rates for ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus were 1/1 for amoxicillin and 7/8 (88%) for erythromycin-sulfa; one patient (12%) had persistent AOM at day 10. Of the patients with AOM due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, 82% (29/35) in the amoxicillin-treated group and 98% (39/40) in the erythromycin-sulfa-treated group were cured. Patients with S pneumoniae as the initial infecting organism who were treated with amoxicillin had significantly more clinical recurrences then their erythromycin-sulfa-treated counterparts, 66% (8/12) vs 33% (3/9). There was no difference between treatment groups in recurrence rates for patients with Haemophilus as the initial infecting organism. On the treatment day indicated, the following number of patients had middle ear effusion: by days 10 to 14, 38% (27/72) amoxicillin-treated patients and 48% (35/73) erythromycin-sulfa-treated patients; by day 28, 10% (7/71) amoxicillin-treated patients and 16% (11/70) erythromycin-sulfa-treated patients. There were no significant differences in adverse reactions. The erythromycin-sulfa combination is safe and effective treatment for AOM, including ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus.