Guidelines versus ground lines: Tuberculosis of the central nervous system.

AIM: This questionnaire-based national survey is aimed at understanding the patterns of practice of various aspects of central nervous system (CNS) tuberculosis (TB) among neurologists. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Neurology department of a tertiary medical college. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent through email to all practicing neurologists in India. The responses were analyzed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Inferential statistics. RESULTS: In all, 144 responses were received (out of the 853 questionnaires sent). The major discrepancies were in the primary antitubercular drug regimen (HRZE + HR), duration for tubercular meningitis (TBM) [12 months] and tuberculoma (12-18 months) to develop, follow-up (varied), linezolid use (varied), proportion of drug-resistant cases (<25%), and not taking histological aids (91%). The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) TB polymerase chain reaction (PCR) utility (75%), not using CSF adenosine deaminase [ADA] (58%), the strategy to stop antitubercular drugs, and the use of steroids (77%) were according to guidelines. CONCLUSION: The present survey, for the first time, provides ground-level evidence of various aspects of CNS TB as practiced by neurologists in India. The major diversity was observed in therapeutics such as the choice of antitubercular drugs, its duration, linezolid use beyond the recommended duration, and knowledge of drug resistance. The monitoring aspects of CNS TB also showed variations. The investigational aspects of CNS TB such as using TB PCR, not using CSF ADA, and regular neuroimaging revealed a good clinical practice. Other CSF parameters require uniformity. This survey thus helps to identify areas of future work in CNS TB in India.

A systematic and quantitative evaluation of plantar stimulation: The effect of type, pattern, force of stimulation in eliciting an accurate plantar response.

OBJECTIVES: Systematic and quantitative evaluation of the plantar reflex has been infrequently studied in the past and can help assess the vexing variables encountered in its elicitation. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of type, pattern and force of stimulation in eliciting an accurate plantar response in patients with pyramidal dysfunction and healthy individuals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A special instrument was designed to give a predesigned force of stimulus. The plantar surface of foot was divided into nine parts and point and stroke stimulations were studied systematically in pyramidal weakness feet (cases) and healthy control feet (controls) with predefined forces. Results were tabulated and statistically analysed. RESULTS: Stroke stimulation was superior to point stimulation in eliciting plantar response. There was no significant difference in the responses to the three predefined forces used for stroke stimulations. Sensitivity of Babinski sign was 72.9% and specificity was 100%. In pyramidal weakness feet, extensor responses were significantly elicited from lateral starting stroke patterns (67%) and on moving medially they were replaced by flexor responses (44%). Withdrawal responses increased with the stimulations reaching the distal foot and with the curvilinear component of stimulations. Sensitivity responses (related to the sensitivity of an individual) contaminate the plantar response and occasionally make its interpretation difficult. In subjects with bilateral sensitivity with unilateral disease, knowing the sensitivity pattern on the normal side improved the interpretation of plantar response on the abnormal side. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the optimal method for eliciting Babinski sign accurately is to stroke the lateral aspect of the sole of the foot in a straight line up to mid foot. This should be performed in both feet three times, and if the weakness is unilateral, it should be performed in the normal leg first to aid interpretation of the affected leg.