Ultrasonography of abdominal muscles: Differential diagnosis of late-onset Pompe disease and myotonic dystrophy type 1.

Introduction: Axial muscles are involved earlier and to a greater extent in late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) than in myotonic muscular dystrophy type 1 (DM1). We aimed to evaluate abdominal muscles in LOPD compared in DM1 using muscle ultrasonography. Methods: Patients with LOPD (n = 3), DM1 (n = 10), and age- and gender-matched healthy subjects (n = 34) were enrolled for muscle ultrasonography. Patients with LOPD and DM1 were 20 to 59 years of age with a disease duration ranging between 7 and 30 years. A multifrequency linear transducer was used to evaluate quality and thickness in the abdominal muscles and extremities. Results: The quantitative muscle echo score revealed a higher Z score in abdominal muscles in Patients with LOPD (scores were relatively normal for the biceps and flexor digitorum groups). Patients with LOPD had significantly lower abdominal muscle thickness than patients with DM1. Abdominal muscle strength was significantly correlated with the muscle echogenicity, trunk impairment scale, and trunk control test. The extremities' sum score was correlated with the total Medical Research Council score. Discussion: The increased quantitative muscle score in abdominal muscles, sparing the biceps and flexor digitorum groups, may offer differential diagnosis between LOPD and DM1. Ultrasound can easily access abdominal muscles and investigate muscle echogenicity and thickness. A quantitative approach using muscle echogenicity rather than muscle thickness may provide a greater correlation with trunk muscle function.

Minimal invasive fixation following with radiotherapy for radiosensitive unstable metastatic spine.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become a feasible option for patients with spinal metastasis, but the effectiveness of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) without decompression in patients with severe cord compression remains unknown. We compared PPSF without decompression with debulking surgery in patients with radiosensitive, unstable, metastatic thoracolumbar spinal cord compression. METHODS: A retrospective study of surgically treated spinal metastasis and spinal cord compression patients was conducted between October 2014 and June 2019. Demographic and pre- and postoperative data were collected and compared between patients treated with minimally invasive percutaneous fixation and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (the PPSF group) and those treated with debulking surgery (the debulking group). RESULTS: We included 50 patients in this study. The PPSF group had a significantly shorter operative time (143.56 ± 49.44 min vs. 181.47 ± 40.77 min; p < 0.01), significantly lower blood loss (116.67 ± 109.92 mL vs. 696.55 ± 519.43 mL; p < 0.01), and significantly shorter hospital stay (11.90 ± 9.69 vs. 25.35 ± 20.65; p < 0.01) than did the debulking group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in age, sex, spinal instability neoplastic score, ESCC, Tomita scores, numeric rating scale scores, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale scores, survival rates, and complication rates. Postoperative neurologic function and decrease in pain were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: The PPSF group had a shorter operation time, shorter length of hospital stay, and less blood loss than did the debulking group. PPSF followed by EBRT is pain relieving, relatively safe and appropriate as palliative therapy.

The comparison between anterior and posterior approaches for removal of infected lumbar interbody cages and a proposal regarding the use of endoscope-assisted technique.

BACKGROUND: In cases of postoperative deep wound infection after interbody fusion with cages, it is often difficult to decide whether to preserve or remove the cages, and there is no consensus on the optimal approach for removing cages. The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical management of cage infection after lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2012 and August 2018. Patients were included if they had postoperative deep wound infection and required cage removal. Clinical outcomes, including operative parameters, visual analog scale, neurologic status, and fusion status, were assessed and compared between anterior and posterior approaches for cage removal. RESULTS: Of 130 patients who developed postoperative infection and required surgical debridement, 25 (27 levels) were diagnosed with cage infection. Twelve underwent an anterior approach, while 13 underwent cage removal with a posterior approach. Significant differences were observed between the anterior and posterior approaches in elapsed time to the diagnosis of cage infection, operative time, and hospital stay. All patients had better or stationary American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale, but one case of recurrence in adjacent disc 3 months after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Both anterior and posterior approaches for cage removal, followed by interbody debridement and fusion with bone grafts, were feasible methods and offered promising results. An anterior approach often requires an additional extension of posterior instrumentation due to the high incidence of concurrent pedicle screw loosening. The use of an endoscope-assisted technique is suggested to facilitate safe removal of cages.

Anatomic Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction With Extra-articular Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Internal Brace.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with additional procedures could be necessary for patients with increased preoperative pivot shift. Double-bundle (DB) ACLR provides more footprint coverage and recreates the 2 functional anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles, which are believed to give better joint function and stability than single-bundle (SB) ACLR. Internal brace augmentation with suture tape is proposed along with tendon graft in ACLR to protect the newly reconstructed ligament during rehabilitation. Additional reconstruction with anterolateral ligament (ALL) during ACLR has shown significant reduction in the level of persistent pivot shift. In Technical Note we present a modified surgical technique of combined anatomic DB ACLR and ALLR with hamstring autograft and internal brace, using button suspensory fixation device and aperture screws. The objective of this technique is to decrease residual anterior and rotational instability after ACLR and ALLR.

Minimally Invasive Surgery Combining Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws and Pedicle Screws to Treat Spondylodiskitis: Technical Notes and Preliminary Results.

OBJECTIVE: Various surgical techniques for treating spondylodiskitis have been proposed, but the most appropriate surgical treatment remains controversial. In this study, we propose a new hybrid approach combining the use of cortical bone trajectory screws and pedicle screws with the technique of transforaminal lumbar interbody debridement and fusion. With this method, we can shorten the length of the segment that needs to be fixed, minimize the extent of surgical dissection, and reduce the risk of adjacent level degeneration. METHODS: Patients with clinical and radiographic evidences of single-level lumbar spondylodiskitis seen between January and December of 2017 were included in the study. Demographic data, including age and sex, were recorded. The intraoperative details, results of culture, functional outcome, radiologic outcome, and length of hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age of 15 patients was 62.8 years. The mean operative time was 135 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 260 mL. The culture rate was 80%. The mean Numeric Rating Scale score and Oswestry Disability Index score significantly improved from 6.60 to 2.47 and from 21.20 to 10.20, respectively. No major perioperative complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: With the proposed hybrid approach using cortical bone trajectory and pedicle screws with the transforaminal lumbar interbody debridement and fusion technique, the damaged anterior column can be debrided and reconstructed, and spinal stabilization can also be achieved.

Do etoricoxib and indometacin have similar effects and safety for gouty arthritis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Gout, a common medical condition that causes pain, can be treated by painkillers and anti-inflammatories. Indometacin and etoricoxib are two such drugs. However, no synthesized evidence exists comparing etoricoxib with indometacin in treating patients with gout. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library without restrictions on language or publication date for potential randomized clinical trials comparing etoricoxib with indometacin for gout. The meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Search results yielded 313 references from six electronic databases, four of which met the eligibility criteria. These four were randomized clinical trials, and they involved a total of 609 patients with gouty arthritis. No significant differences were observed in pain score change, tenderness, or swelling between etoricoxib and indometacin; the mean differences were -0.05 (95% CI, -0.21 to 0.10), -0.06 (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.05), and -0.04 (95% CI, -0.17 to 0.09). However, the pooled data revealed that significantly fewer overall adverse events occurred in the etoricoxib group (n=105, 33.5%) than in the indometacin group (n=130, 44.1%) and the risk ratio was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.62-0.94). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis revealed that etoricoxib and indometacin have similar effects on pain relief. However, etoricoxib has a significantly lower risk of adverse events than does indometacin, especially digestive system-related adverse events.

Higher Ventricular Premature Complex Burden is Associated with Lower Systolic Blood Pressure Response.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) with a burden higher than 10% to 20% of total daily heart beats can cause VPC-induced cardiomyopathy. The systolic blood pressure response (SBPR) is the difference between the SBP during maximal exercise and rest. A low SBPR was recently identified to be a marker of cardiomyopathy. The aim of this manuscript was to clarify the association between VPC burden and SBPR. METHODS: From January to December 2015, all patients with a VPC burden larger than 240 beats/day on Holter recordings and treadmill exercise tests were enrolled. The patients with a heart rhythm other than sinus rhythm, coronary artery disease, and severe cardiomyopathy were excluded. The SBPR was measured during a treadmill test. The basic characteristics and echocardiographic findings were collected. RESULTS: All patients were classified into three groups: Group 1; 240-1,000 VPCs/day (n = 78), Group 2; 1,000-10,000 VPCs/day (n = 54), and Group 3; > 10,000 VPCs/day (n = 21). Group 1 had a higher SBPR than the other groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that only VPC burden was associated with SBPR. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a VPC burden > 1,055 beats/day predicted a SBPR < 40 mmHg. The results were consistent in all subgroups. There were no significant differences in echocardiographic findings among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: AVPC burden higher than 1,055 beats/day was associated with a reduced SBPR.