RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The mortality of acute aortic dissection (AD) can reach 65~70%. However, it is challenging to follow the progress of AD formation. The purpose of this work was to observe the process of dissection development using a novel tear-embedded silicone phantom. METHODS: Silicone phantoms were fabricated by embedding a torn area and primary tear feature on the inner layer. CT scanning and laser lightening were conducted to observe the variations in thickness and volume of the true lumen (TL) and false lumen (FL) during development. RESULTS: The model with a larger interlayer adhesion damage required a lower pressure to trigger the development of dissection. At the initiation stage of dissection, the volume of TL increased by 25.5%, accompanied by a 19.5% enlargement of tear size. The force analysis based on the change of tear size verified the deduction of the process of interlaminar separation from the earlier studies. CONCLUSIONS: The primary tear and the weakening adhesion of the vessel layers are key factors in AD development, suggesting that some forms of primary damage to the arterial wall, in particular, the lumen morphology of vessels with straight inner lumen, should be considered as early risk predictors of AD.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: In vitro patient-specific flexible vascular models are helpful for understanding the haemodynamic changes before and after endovascular treatment and for effective training of neuroendovascular interventionalists. However, it is difficult to fabricate models of overall unified or controllable thickness using existing manufacturing methods. In this study, we developed an improved and easily implemented method by combining 3D printing and brush-spin-coating processes to produce a transparent silicone model of uniform or varied thickness. METHODS: First, a water-soluble inner-skeleton model, based on clinical data, was printed on a 3D printer. The skeleton model was subsequently fixed in a single-axis-rotation machine to enable continuous coating of silicone, the thickness of which was manually controlled by adsorption and removal of excess silicone in a brush-spinning operation. After the silicone layer was solidified, the inner skeleton was further dissolved in a hot water bath, affording a transparent vascular model with real geometry. To verify the controllability of the coating thickness by using this method, a straight tube, an idealised aneurysm model, a patient-specific aortic arch model, and an abdominal aortic aneurysm model were manufactured. RESULTS: The different thicknesses of the manufactured tubes could be well controlled, with the relative standard deviations being 5.6 and 8.1% for the straight and aneurysm tubes, respectively. Despite of the diameter changing from 33 to 20 mm in the patient-specific aorta, the thickness of the fabricated aortic model remains almost the same along the longitudinal direction with a lower standard deviation of 3.1%. In the more complex patient-specific abdominal aneurysm model, varied thicknesses were realized to mimic the measured data from the CT images, where the middle of the aneurysm was with 2 mm and abdominal aorta as well as the iliac arteries had the normal thickness of 2.3 mm. CONCLUSION: Through the brush-spin-coating method, models of different sizes and complexity with prescribed thickness can be manufactured, which will be helpful for developing surgical treatment strategies or training neuroendovascular interventionalists.
