A multi-center study on recurrent inguinal hernias: assessment of surgeons' compliance to guideline-based repair and evaluation of short-term outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: As patients with recurrent inguinal hernia (RIH) are at a higher risk of perioperative complications, international guidelines have been developed to mitigate these risks by recommending the reverse approach for repair. We aim to study the characteristics of RIH, compliance to guidelines-based repair (GR) and determine factors influencing compliance to guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with RIH was carried out at two tertiary institutions in Singapore, over 10 years from January 2010 to 2020. RESULTS: There were 16 patients with bilateral recurrences and 214 patients with unilateral recurrences. The characteristics of patients with non-guidelines-based repair (NGR) versus GR were similar, p > 0.05. GR was performed for 128 (52.1%) hernias as compared to NGR for 118 (47.9%) hernias. The open approach was more common in NGR than GR, 115/118 (89.8%) versus 58/128 (45.3%), p < 0.001. Forty (n = 40, 16.3%) RIH presented emergently, of which 37 underwent NGR while 3 underwent GR, p < 0.0001. More consultants were present during GR 103/128 (80.5%) as compared to NGR 78/118 (66.1%), p = 0.018. Emergency presentation of hernia recurrence, OR 7.74 (CI 6.11-9.20), p = 0.005, and open repair during the index repair were significantly associated with NGR, OR 6.63 (CI 4.42-8.84), p = 0.01. Median length of stay was shorter in the GR 1 day (IQR 1-2 days) versus 2 days (IQR 2-5 days) in the NGR group, p = 0.02. CONCLUSION: The compliance rate of GR for RIH is 52%. NGR for RIH had acceptable short-term outcomes. For elective presentation of RIH, GR should be encouraged given a shorter length of hospital stay.

Seroma prevention strategies in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) has been increasing in popularity over the years. Seroma formation is a common complication of LVHR. The aim of this study is to review the current evidence on seroma prevention strategies following LVHR. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase (1946-13 February 2019) and Medline (1946-13 February 2019) databases was conducted using terms which include "seroma", "hernia, ventral" and "laparoscopy". All studies are comparative retrospective or prospective human adult studies in peer-reviewed journals describing at least one intra-operative intervention designed to decrease the rate of seroma formation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. RESULTS: The database searches identified 3762 citations, and 21 studies were included for final analysis. Five studies compared the different methods of mesh fixation, nine studies compared primary defect closure (PFC) and bridged repair, two studies compared the effect of different types of meshes, two studies looked into the use of electrical cauterization, one study compared single- site laparoscopy with conventional laparoscopy, one study looked into the use of fibrin sealant and one study compared transabdominal preperitoneal placement of mesh with conventional repair. PFC appears to be the most promising with large studies showing a low rate of seroma formation with additional benefits of decreasing wound infection and recurrence rate. Cauterisation of hernia sac and injection of fibrin sealant also show promising results but are mainly derived from small studies. Other strategies did not demonstrate benefit. CONCLUSION: Currently, primary fascial closure appears to be the most promising strategy available to decrease seroma formation after LVHR based on the results of large studies. Other promising strategies that decrease dead space such as cauterisation of the sac and fibrin sealant injection will require further multicentre trials to confirm benefit before an increase in operative time and cost can be justified for their routine use.

'Start to finish trans-institutional transdisciplinary care': a novel approach improves colorectal surgical results in frail elderly patients.

AIM: The frail elderly surgical patient is at increased risk of morbidity after major surgery. A transdisciplinary Geriatric Surgery Service (GSS) has been shown to produce consistently positive results in our institution. A trans-institutional transdisciplinary Start to Finish (STF) programme was initiated incorporating seamless prehabilitation and rehabilitation to enhance the outcome further. METHOD: Patients who underwent major colorectal resection in Khoo Teck Puat Hospital and were managed under the GSS from January 2007 to December 2014 were included in this prospective study. The STF programme was initiated from January 2012. The surgical outcome of patients managed under the GSS before the initiation of STF was compared with that after its implementation. RESULTS: There were 57 patients after the initiation of the STF programme compared with 60 patients managed before STF. There were 26.4% and 25% of frail patients in the STF group compared with the non-STF group (P = 0.874). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the STF group (8.4 days vs 11.0 days, P = 0.029). Functional recovery in patients available for follow-up at 6 weeks showed 100% (46/46) recovery in the elective STF group who received prehabilitation and 95.7% (45/47) in the elective non-STF group who did not (P = 0.157). There were no significant differences in a Clavien-Dindo complication score of Grade 3 or more and 30-day mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Through a trans-institutional transdisciplinary approach, we managed to achieve a significantly shorter hospital stay in frail patients having colorectal surgery. All elective patients who received prehabilitation achieved full functional recovery.