Stereotactic radiosurgery for medium and large uveal melanoma with a non-invasive eye immobilization device, a single institutional case series.

PURPOSE: To investigate the treatment outcome, visual outcome, and adverse effects of five-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to medium- and large-sized uveal melanoma with a non-invasive eye immobilization device. METHODS: Medical records of 14 patients with uveal melanoma receiving SRS with a total dose of 50 Gy in five fractions from 2008 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A non-invasive eye fixation device was used to achieve and monitor eye immobilization. RESULTS: Local tumor control rates were 85.7% and 75.0% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. The average tumor diameter decreased significantly from 10.0 ± 3.21 mm to 8.36 ± 3.71 mm (p = 0.038) 15 months after SRS, while the average tumor thickness decreased significantly from 5.45 ± 2.21 mm to 4.34 ± 2.29 (p = 0.036) 21 months after SRS. The 5-year metastasis-free survival was 87.5%. The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) deteriorated from logMAR 0.296 at baseline to logMAR 1.112 at the last individual follow-up visits (p < 0.001). Adverse effects of SRS were comparable to those reported with proton-beam radiotherapy or Gamma knife therapy. CONCLUSION: SRS combined with a non-invasive eye immobilization device is an effective and safe alternative eye-preserving treatment for medium- to large-sized uveal melanoma. BCVA at 3 months may be a predictor for BCVA at 1 year.

Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Survival and Liver Toxicity in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine whether pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could predict survival outcomes and liver toxicity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this retrospective study we collected pretreatment NLR of HCC patients treated with SABR between December 2007 and August 2018 and determined its association with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and radiation-related liver toxicity defined as an increase in the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score by ≥2 within 3 months after SABR in the absence of disease progression. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients with a median follow-up of 13.3 months were included. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis found that an NLR ≥2.4 was optimum (area under the curve, 0.762; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.682-0.841, P < .001) for predicting poor 1-year OS (38.2% vs 83.6%, P < .001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that NLR was significantly associated with OS, both as a continuous (P = .006) and a binary variable (NLR set at 2.4; P = .003). Multiple tumors (P = .003), macrovascular invasion (P = .024), extrahepatic spread (P = .002), and albumin-bilirubin score (P = .020) were also significant predictors of OS. Elevated NLR independently prognosticated poor progression-free survival (P = .016). Liver toxicity was seen in 22 evaluable patients (15.4%). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis found NLR ≥4.0 was optimum at predicting liver toxicity (31.4% vs 10.2%, P = .005). A higher NLR (P = .049) and albumin-bilirubin score (P = .002) were independent risk factors for liver toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: NLR is an objective and ubiquitous inflammatory marker that can predict OS and liver toxicity in HCC patients undergoing SABR. NLR could be a useful biomarker for patient risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making.

C1QTNF6 as a Novel Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a highly aggressive disease and ∼30% of the patients are diagnosed at the metastatic stage. Even with new targeted therapies, the average progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates are dismal. Thus, biomarkers for early detection and progression could improve disease outcome. The role of C1q/tumor necrosis factor (C1QTNF) family in cancer is an emerging field of research. However, the biological function of C1q/tumor necrosis factor-related protein 6 (C1QTNF6) and its prognostic value in cancer are rarely reported. This study aimed to evaluate C1QTNF6 as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for ccRCC. In this study, we enrolled 993 ccRCC samples (data from our cohort, The Cancer Genome Atlas, and Gene Expression Omnibus) with C1QTNF6 expression to explore its role and mechanism in ccRCC. The diagnostic power of C1QTNF6 was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and its prognostic value was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models, respectively. In addition, the gene set enrichment analysis was performed to unveil the molecular mechanism of C1QTNF6 in ccRCC. We demonstrated that C1QTNF6 was overexpressed in ccRCC, and elevated C1QTNF6 expression correlated with clinical progression. Besides, C1QTNF6 served as a new diagnostic biomarker for renal cell carcinoma. Moreover, C1QTNF6 is an independent risk factor for OS in ccRCC patients. Furthermore, C1QTNF6-related signaling pathways activated in ccRCC are mainly enriched in cell cycle, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and angiogenesis signaling pathways. Taken together, our results provided insights in understanding the potential role of C1QTNF6 in promoting tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis, and its use as a novel cancer diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for ccRCC.

Phase II study of metabolic response to one-cycle chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the optimal use of 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in measuring metabolic tumor response is undetermined. We launched a phase II trial to evaluate early metabolic response to one-cycle induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced ESCC. METHODS: ESCC patients in stage classification T3N0, N1M0, or M1a (American Joint Committee on Cancer, 6th edition) received one-cycle chemotherapy comprising paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 24-h infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin on days 1 and 8, followed by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 40 Gy, with paclitaxel/cisplatin and then esophagectomy. PET was performed at baseline and day 14 of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). We hypothesized early metabolic responders with >35% reduction in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), would have better pCR Results. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were enrolled. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9-27) and 22 months (16-40), respectively. The early metabolic response rate was 55%; and the pCR rate was 34% in the esophagectomy population. The early metabolic response was not associated with pCR or survival. In an exploratory analysis, the postchemotherapy SUVmax was an independent prognostic factor for pCR, PFS, and OS. CONCLUSION: Our study failed to validate the predefined early metabolic response for pCR to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced ESCC patients. However, postchemotherapy SUVmax may be prognostic and predictive, and warrants further study.

Postchemoradiotherapy Pathologic Stage Classified by the American Joint Committee on the Cancer Staging System Predicts Prognosis of Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: To determine whether the postchemoradiotherapy (post-CRT) pathologic stage predicts the outcomes of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing preoperative CRT followed by surgery. METHODS: From three phase II trials of preoperative CRT for locally advanced ESCC, 140 patients were included. Preoperative CRT comprised twice weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin-based regimens and 40-Gy radiotherapy in 20 fractions. The post-CRT pathologic stage was classified according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition staging system. The prognostic effects of clinicopathologic factors were analyzed using Cox regression. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 61.9 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort were 24.5 and 30.9 months, respectively. The post-CRT pathologic stage was 0 in 34.5%, I in 12.9%, II in 29.3%, III in 13.6%, and ypT0N1-2 in 6.4% of the patients. The median PFS was 47.2, 25.9, 16.0, 9.4, and 15.1 months, and the median OS was 57.4, 34.1, 26.2, 14.1, and 17.6 months for patients with post-CRT pathologic stage 0, I, II, III, and ypT0N1-2, respectively. In multivariate analysis, performance status (p < 0.001), tumor location (p = 0.016), and extranodal extension (p = 0.024) were independent prognostic factors for PFS, whereas performance status (p < 0.001) and post-CRT pathologic stage (p = 0.027) were independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: The post-CRT pathologic stage classified by American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition staging system predicted the survival of locally advanced ESCC patients who underwent preoperative paclitaxel and cisplatin-based CRT followed by esophagectomy.

Radiosensitization by combining an aurora kinase inhibitor with radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma through cell cycle interruption.

Radiotherapy has been integrated into the multimodal treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially of localized hepatic tumor(s) refractory to conventional treatment. However, tumor control remains unsatisfactory mainly because of insufficient dose, and sublethally irradiated tumor may associate with metastasis. Our aim was to assess the effect of combining a molecularly targeted Aurora kinase inhibitor, VE-465, with radiotherapy in in vitro and in vivo models of human HCC. Human HCC cell lines (Huh7 and PLC-5) were used to evaluate the in vitro synergism of combining VE-465 with irradiation. Flow cytometry analyzed the cell cycle changes, while western blot investigated the protein expressions after the combined treatment. Severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice bearing ectopic and orthotopic HCC xenografts were treated with VE-465 and/or radiotherapy for the in vivo response. VE-465 significantly enhanced radiation-induced death in HCC cells by a mechanism involving the enhanced inhibition of histone H3 phosphorylation and interruption of cell cycle change. In SCID, mice bearing ectopic HCC xenografts, pretreatment with VE-465 (20 mg/kg/day × 9 days) significantly enhanced the tumor-suppressive effect of radiotherapy (5 Gy/day × 5 days) by 54.0%. A similar combinatorial effect of VE-465 and radiotherapy was observed in an orthotopic model of Huh7 tumor growth by 17.2%. In the orthotopic Huh7 xenografts, VE-465 significantly enhanced radiation-induced tumor growth suppression by a mechanism involving the increased apoptosis. VE-465 is a potent inhibitor of Aurora kinase with therapeutic value as a radiosensitizer of HCC.

Retrospective analysis of outcome differences in preoperative concurrent chemoradiation with or without elective nodal irradiation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and patterns of failure of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) undergoing preoperative concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) followed by radical surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively studied 118 patients with AJCC Stage II to III esophageal SCC undergoing preoperative CCRT (median, 36 Gy), followed by radical esophagectomy. Of them, 73 patients (62%) had ENI and 45 patients (38%) had no ENI. Patients with ENI received radiotherapy to either supraclavicular (n = 54) or celiac (n = 19) lymphatics. Fifty-six patients (57%) received chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus cisplatin. The 3-year progression-free survival, overall survival, and patterns of failure were analyzed. Distant nodal recurrence was classified into M1a and M1b regions. A separate analysis using matched cases was conducted. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 38 months. There were no differences in pathological complete response rate (p = 0.12), perioperative mortality rate (p = 0.48), or delayed Grade 3 or greater cardiopulmonary toxicities (p = 0.44), between the groups. More patients in the non-ENI group had M1a failure than in the ENI group, with 3-year rates of 11% and 3%, respectively (p = 0.05). However, the 3-year isolated distant nodal (M1a + M1b) failure rates were not different (ENI, 10%; non-ENI, 14%; p = 0.29). In multivariate analysis, pathological nodal status was the only independent prognostic factor associated with overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.78, p = 0.045). The 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 45% and 45%, respectively, in the ENI group, and 52% and 43%, respectively, in the non-ENI group (p = 0.31 and 0.89, respectively). Matched cases analysis did not show a statistical difference in outcomes between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: ENI reduced the M1a failure rate but was not associated with improved outcomes in patients undergoing preoperative CCRT for esophageal SCC. Pathological nodal metastasis predicted poor outcome.

Comprehensive locoregional treatment and systemic therapy for postmastectomy isolated locoregional recurrence.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of comprehensive locoregional therapy and systemic therapy on disease control and survival for postmastectomy patients with isolated locoregional recurrence (ILRR). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 115 postmastectomy breast cancer patients treated for ILRR were included. Of the patients, 98 underwent comprehensive locoregional treatment (local tumor excision plus postoperative radiotherapy), and 17 received definitive radiotherapy alone. Involved-field radiotherapy was given to 69 patients, whereas entire-field radiotherapy (both involved-field and elective-field, involving the chest wall and regional lymphatics) was given to 46 patients. Systemic therapy consisting of hormone therapy, chemotherapy, or both was given to 69% of patients. RESULTS: Patients treated with comprehensive locoregional treatment had a significantly better 5-year invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and overall survival (OS) after ILRR than patients treated with definitive radiotherapy alone (IDFS rate, 51% vs. 16%, p = 0.006; OS rate, 62% vs. 37%, p = 0.017). Patients with the most comprehensive locoregional treatment (recurrent tumor excision and entire-field radiotherapy) and systemic therapy had a significantly better 5-year IDFS and OS than patients given either treatment or neither treatment (IDFS rate, 52% vs. 39%, p = 0.011; OS rate, 63% vs. 50%, p = 0.026). Multivariate analysis revealed that positive axillary lymph nodes, Grade III tumor, negative estrogen and progesterone receptor status at primary diagnosis, disease-free interval of less than 2 years, and less comprehensive locoregional treatment were significantly associated with worse IDFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Use of comprehensive locoregional therapy and systemic therapy can achieve good survival outcome in a substantial proportion of postmastectomy patients with ILRR.