Diabetes and work: The need of a close collaboration between diabetologist and occupational physician.

AIM: The Italian Society of Occupational Medicine (SIML), the Italian Diabetes Society (SID) and the Association of Diabetologists (AMD) joined a working group that produced a consensus paper aimed to assess the available evidence regarding the interplay between specific working conditions, including shift- and night-time work, working activities at high risk of accidents and work at heights, working tasks requiring high-energy expenditure, working activities at extreme temperatures and diabetes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Diabetes is a group of metabolic disorders caused by defects in insulin secretion and/or action affecting millions of people worldwide, many of whom are or wish to be active members of the workforce. Although diabetes, generally, does not prevent a person from properly performing his/her working tasks, disease complications can significantly compromise a person's ability to work. Therefore, it appears evident the need to understand the relationship between occupational risk factors and diabetes. The working group included in the document some practical recommendations useful to ensure diabetic workers the possibility to safely and effectively undertake their jobs and to adequately manage and treat their disease, also in the workplace. In this perspective concerted action of all the workplace preventive figures, occupational physicians and diabetologists should be strongly encouraged. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are necessary to define workplace-based interventions, which should be minimally invasive towards the work organization, allowing diabetic workers to fully realize their work skills while improving their wellbeing at work.

Healthcare resource use, direct and indirect costs of hypoglycemia in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and nationwide projections. Results of the HYPOS-1 study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To obtain an accurate picture of the total costs of hypoglycemia, including the indirect costs and comparing the differences between type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS AND RESULTS: HYPOS-1 was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study which analyzed the data of 2229 consecutive patients seen at 18 diabetes clinics. Data on healthcare resource use and indirect costs by diabetes type were collected via a questionnaire. The domains of inpatient admission and hospital stay, work days lost, and third-party assistance were also explored. Resource utilization was reported as estimated incidence rates (IRs) of hypoglycemic episodes per 100 person-years and estimated costs as IRs per person-years. For every 100 patients with T1DM, 9 emergency room (ER) visits and 6 emergency medical service calls for hypoglycemia were required per year; for every 100 patients with T2DM, 3 ER visits and 1 inpatient admission were required, with over 3 nights spent in hospital. Hypoglycemia led to 58 work days per 100 person-years lost by the patient or a family member in T1DM versus 19 in T2DM. The costs in T1DM totaled €90.99 per person-year and €62.04 in T2DM. Direct and indirect costs making up the total differed by type of diabetes (60% indirect costs in T1DM versus 43% in T2DM). The total cost associated with hypoglycemia in Italy is estimated to be €107 million per year. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect costs meaningfully contribute to the total costs associated with hypoglycemia. As compared with T1DM, T2DM requires fewer ER visits and incurs lower indirect costs but more frequent hospital use.

Urinary excretion of glycated albumin in insulin-dependent diabetic patients with micro- and macroalbuminuria.

Non-enzymatic glycosylation (glycation) involves both circulating proteins, such as albumin and structural proteins, such as the components of the glomerular basement membrane. Glycated albumin is more anionic than unmodified plasma albumin at physiologic pH. Preferential urinary excretion of glycated proteins has occasionally been reported in diabetes. We therefore investigated the selectivity index (renal clearance of non-glycated/glycated albumin) in 25 insulin-dependent diabetic patients (17 with microalbuminuria and 8 with macroalbuminuria), and 19 healthy subjects. The selectivity index was significantly higher (p less than 0.01) in the microalbuminuric patients than in the macroalbuminuric patients and the control subjects: 1.11 +/- 0.03 SEM vs 0.94 +/- 0.08 vs 0.98 +/- 0.02. These results are not consistent with preferential urinary excretion of glycated albumin in insulin-dependent diabetic patients with increased urinary albumin excretion.

The increase in albuminuria induced by exercise is not associated with preferential excretion of glycated albumin in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients.

The increase in urinary albumin excretion induced by acute exercise in Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients is associated with the urinary excretion of cationic proteins. To test whether the renal excretion of glycated albumin (more anionic than non-glycated albumin) is affected by exercise, we submitted seven normoalbuminuric (albumin excretion rate less than 30 mg/24 h) Type 1 diabetic patients and six well-matched healthy subjects to an exercise test (600 kpm/min for 20 min) on a bicycle ergometer, preceded and followed by a 1-h resting period. The selectivity index (renal clearance of non-glycated/glycated albumin) was not significantly different among the pre-exercise, exercise and post-exercise periods, either in the normal subjects (1.01 +/- 0.03 vs 1.08 +/- 0.06 vs 1.08 +/- 0.05) or in the diabetic patients (1.25 +/- 0.09 vs 1.20 +/- 0.07 vs 1.20 +/- 0.06), whereas it was significantly higher (p less than 0.05) in diabetic patients compared to healthy subjects during pre-exercise. These results are not consistent with the hypothesis that acute exercise may induce a preferential excretion of glycated albumin.

Urinary excretion of glycated albumin in insulin-dependent diabetic patients with normal urinary albumin excretion.

Glycation involves both circulating proteins, such as albumin, and structural proteins, such as the components of the glomerular basement membrane. A preferential excretion of glycated albumin (more anionic at physiological pH compared with unmodified plasma albumin) has been reported by some authors, but not by others. We therefore investigated the selectivity index (renal clearance of non-glycated albumin/clearance of glycated albumin) in 25 insulin-dependent diabetic patients with normal urinary albumin excretion and in 19 well-matched control subjects. The selectivity index was significantly higher in diabetic patients than in control subjects: 1.38 +/- 0.05 SEM vs 0.98 +/- 0.02, p less than 0.0001. This result is not consistent with a preferential urinary excretion of glycated albumin, at least in normoalbuminuric uncomplicated insulin-dependent diabetic patients.