Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Med ; 12(7)2023 Apr 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37048746

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery and ERAS protocol care are both prominent developments and have each become global trends. However, the effects and learning curves of combining robotic surgery and ERAS care in colorectal resection have not yet been well validated. This study aimed to present our real-world experience and establish the learning curves necessary for the implementation of an ERAS program in minimally-invasive surgery for colorectal resection, while also evaluating the impact that the development of the robotic technique has on ERAS outcomes. METHODS: A total of 155 patients who received elective, minimally-invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic surgery for colorectal resection, with ERAS care during the period June 2019 to September 2021 were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were divided chronologically into five groups (31 cases per quintile). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative data, ERAS compliance, and surgical outcomes were all compared among the quintiles. Learning curves were evaluated based on ERAS compliance and optimal recovery, which are composed of an absence of major complications, postoperative length of stay (LOS) of no more than five days, and no readmission within 30 days. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess factors associated with postoperative LOS. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences seen overall or between the quintile groups in regards to demographic and tumor characteristic parameters. A total of 79 patients (51%) received robotic surgery, with the ratio of robotic groups rising chronologically from zero in the first quintile to 90.3% in the fifth quintile (p < 0.001). The median compliance rate of total ERAS protocol was 83.3% overall, 72.2% in the first quintile and 83.3% in the 2nd-5th quintiles (p < 0.001). A total of 85 patients underwent optimal recovery after surgery, four patients in the first quintile, 11 patients in the second quintile, and 21, 24, 25 patients in the 3rd-5th quintiles respectively (p < 0.001). There were significant improvements from early to later groups upon postoperative LOS (p < 0.001). In addition, the surgical outcomes including first oral intake within 24 hours after surgery, time to first stool and early termination of intravenous fluid administration showed significant improvement among the quintiles. A multivariable logistic regression model demonstrated that robotic surgery was superior to laparoscopic surgery upon postoperative LOS (odds ratio = 5.029, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.321 to 19.142; p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience demonstrated that an effective implementation of the ERAS program in minimally-invasive colorectal surgery requires 31 patients to accomplish the higher compliance and requires more cases to reach the maturation phase for optimal recovery. We believe that developing a robotic platform would have no impact on the learning curve of ERAS implementation. Moreover, there is a beneficial effect on the postoperative length of surgery provided through the combination of ERAS care and robotic surgery for patients undergoing colorectal resection.

2.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 91: 106798, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35131626

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: The most common symptoms of primary gastrointestinal (GI) lymphoma are non-specific, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, weight loss, and abdominal pain. The rare acute symptoms include bowel obstruction, intussusception, and perforation. Primary small bowel lymphoma accounts for the smallest proportion of all GI malignancies. We report a case of intestinal lymphoma presenting with bloody stools and anemia. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient initially underwent both duodenoscopy and colonoscopy with negative findings. Isotopic red blood cell (RBC) scan was then performed due to persistent bleeding along with computed tomography angiography (CTA) because of suspected bleeding in the left abdomen. Successful embolization over the arcade of the sigmoid and left colic arteries was performed. However, the bleeding did not stop, and ischemic colitis was diagnosed by repeat colonoscopy. A coloenteric fistula was finally discovered during emergent laparotomy. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: GI lymphomas are a rare disease entity among the all GI malignancies. Despite acute abdominal symptoms including obstruction, perforation, bleeding and intussusception, enteral fistula is also one of the complications. It was seen to be a long-term complication after treatment or disease process in most of cases, however it could occur as the initial manifestation. GI bleeding is a life-threatening condition and commonly needs prompt decision making. There were no standard managements for these patients, it depends on clinical judgements from physician individually. CONCLUSION: This is a rare condition that has not been previously described in Taiwan. Early diagnosis and timely management will decrease morbidity and mortality in the GI lymphoma population.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...