Difficult choices for young patients with cancer: the supportive role of decisional counseling.

PURPOSE: The aim of patient decisional support interventions is to promote shared decision making. Many of these interventions are comprehensive of information and guidance. In this pilot study, we evaluate the effects of a decision-making support (decision counseling (DeCo)) on decision making, decisional conflict, and anxiety in cancer patients facing with values-based decisions on fertility and procreation or genetic testing and risk reduction options in oncology. METHODS: DeCo was proposed during the medical consultation. The following questionnaires were administered to 54 patients before the DeCo session and 1 week after it: stage of decision making (SDM), decisional conflict scale (DCS) and subscales ("uncertainty," "informed," "clarity," "support," and "effective decision"), state-trait anxiety inventory. Decision Support Questionnaire and Usefulness of Decision Counseling were created ad hoc for this study. Multivariate logistic models and ANCOVA models were used to investigate the changes of SDM and DCS in association with DeCo. RESULTS: We found a significant improving in SDM with DeCo (P = 0.01) and a significant reduction in DCS with DeCo (P = 0.007) measured with the Decision Support Questionnaire. In particular, the DCS informed subscale showed a significant decrease in time (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: DeCo is useful to facilitate decision making and reduce decisional conflict. It plays a role in the perception of being informed while not directly providing clinical information. This model of decisional support intervention, in which information is provided only by the clinician and decisional support is focused on personal aspects that influence the decision, could improve shared decision making between patient and clinicians.

Fertility preservation in cancer patients: the global framework.

Cancer treatment is the most frequent cause of reduced fertility in cancer patients, with up to 80% of survivors affected. None of the established or experimental fertility preservation methods can assure parenthood, rather they may provide a future opportunity to overcome treatment induced sterility. Around 70-75% of young cancer survivors are interested in parenthood but the numbers of patients who access fertility preservation techniques prior treatment are significantly lower. Moreover, despite existing guidelines, healthcare professionals do not address fertility preservation issues adequately. Lack of time and knowledge about existing options, delay in potentially useful treatment, patient's age, partnership status, existing children, sexual orientation and socioeconomic situation are the main barriers to effective fertility preservation. Patient's fears, expectations and priorities shaped by personal values have to be addressed in the framework of medical necessities, realistic survival probabilities, socio-cultural environment and resources availability. We call for a need of patient centred fertility counselling within a framework that should include patients understanding of medical aspects of their cancer, realistic fertility preservation options, preferences based on personal values and goals. Optional support services could also include legal guidance, psychological and spiritual support and financial counselling.

Fertility Preservation Methods in Breast Cancer.

Thanks to the recent advances in reproductive medicine, more and more young women with breast cancer may be offered the possibility of preserving their fertility. Fertility can be endangered by chemotherapy, by treatment duration and by patient's age at diagnosis. The currently available means to preserve a young woman's fertility are pharmacological protection with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues during chemotherapy, and ovarian tissue or oocyte/embryo freezing before treatment. New future venues, including in vitro maturation, will improve the feasibility and efficacy of the fertility preservation methods in breast cancer patients.

The heterogeneity of category-specific semantic disorders: evidence from a new case.

We report a new case of category-specific semantic impairment, affecting living entities, in a patient with traumatic brain damage. In the present investigation we attempted to replicate as closely as possible the testing procedures which have been developed by Caramazza and Shelton (1998) to evaluate EW, a patient with a selective semantic disorder for the animal category. The results in our patient indicated a different performance profile, characterised by a more extensive semantic disorder for living entities, and by a more severe loss of specific visual rather than functional knowledge. These findings concur with other evidence indicating that category-specific semantic disorders are heterogeneous, reflecting different mechanisms of impairment, most likely associated with different neurobiological underpinnings.