Assessing operational readiness: Regulatory landscape and compliance in zimbabwe for medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices.

The regulation of medical devices and In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) medical devices have lagged significantly, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Disparities in regulating medical and IVD medical devices in Africa are below the global average. This may translate to poor access to quality-assured medical and IVD devices, resulting in undesirable health outcomes. Operational readiness to regulate medical and IVD devices at the Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe (MCAZ) was assessed. The aim was to determine the strengths and gaps and propose an action plan that can be monitored and evaluated to assess progress over time. We used the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Benchmarking Tool for medical devices and IVDs methodology to evaluate regulatory oversight of these products. Purposive sampling was used for data collection using researcher-administered global benchmarking tool factsheets and document reviews to evaluate the implementation of the regulatory functions. The regulatory functions assessed were the National Regulatory System, Registration and Market Authorization, Vigilance, Market Surveillance and Control, Licensing Establishment, Regulatory Inspection, Laboratory Testing, and Clinical Trials Oversight. The MCAZ attained maturity level 1, with a regulatory system score of 79%, registration and market authorization 44%, vigilance 27%, market surveillance and control 40%, licensing establishment 62%, regulatory inspection 68%, laboratory testing 88%, and clinical trials 18%. Condoms and gloves were the only regulated medical devices in Zimbabwe. IVDs were not regulated by the MCAZ. This review showed that the regulatory system is not robust, fit for purpose, responsive, transparent, or proportionate to the risk classification of medical devices and IVDs. It is crucial to amend the Medicines and Allied Substance Control Act to incorporate the definition and classification of medical devices and IVDs, regulatory authority establishment, licensing and registration, quality management system, conformity assessment, post-market surveillance, labeling and instructions for use, capacity building and training, and international harmonization.

Navigating regulatory landscape: A qualitative exploration of medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices oversight in Zimbabwe through key stakeholder perspectives.

Medical devices and In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs) are vital for public health and accessible healthcare. Still, there is an imbalance in high-quality products in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Zimbabwe's regulatory framework for medical devices and IVDs is unclear, leading to ineffective compliance and surveillance. As a result, there are knowledge gaps regarding pre-market and post-market regulatory elements to ensure the safety, quality and performance of medical devices and IVDs used in Zimbabwe. Our study aimed to explore the current status of medical devices and IVD regulations in Zimbabwe. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 regulators from the Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe (MCAZ) National Microbiology Reference Laboratory (NMRL), Medical Laboratory and Clinical Scientists Council (MLCScCZ) to understand the current status of medical devices and IVD regulations in Zimbabwe. Three participants completed a questionnaire to understand the regulatory landscape in Zimbabwe. Three key informant interviews were conducted with three regulators from the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA), Tanzanian Medicines and Medical Devices Authority (TMDA), and World Health Organization Regulatory Systems Strengthening (WHO RSS) to learn best practices to create a roadmap for Zimbabwe. We analyzed qualitative data using a thematic analysis. The findings reveal significant deficiencies and gaps in the legal framework for regulating medical devices and IVDs, highlighting the need for a legal framework and the absence of more comprehensive regulations. Regulatory entities face capacity limitations, especially in regulating medical devices and IVDs. Conformity assessment processes, medical devices, IVD classification criteria, and post-market surveillance also represent challenges, highlighting the need for a well-defined framework and regulatory procedures. The Zimbabwean regulatory system pathway is reactive, prompting several regulatory initiatives to address needs. Despite facing challenges, there is recognition of the importance of collaboration among regulatory authorities, emphasizing a shared commitment to improving and strengthening medical devices and IVD regulations for improved patient safety. By advocating for a proactive, comprehensive, and legally sound approach, indicating the potential for collaboration and synergy, this study provides a foundation for well-informed policy recommendations to guide enhancements and build a framework for a resilient, efficient, and transparent regulatory environment in the Zimbabwe and African regions as a whole.

Common causes of EID sample rejection in Zimbabwe and how to mitigate them.

Early infant diagnosis (EID) of HIV provides an opportunity for early HIV detection and access to appropriate Antiretroviral treatment (ART). Dried Blood Spot (DBS) samples are used for EID of exposed infants, born to HIV-positive mothers. However, DBS rejection rates in Zimbabwe have been exceeding the target of less than 2% per month set by the National Microbiology Reference Laboratory (NMRL), in Harare. The aim of this study was to determine the DBS sample rejection rate, the reasons for rejection and the possible associations between rejection and level of health facility where the samples were collected. This is an analytical cross-sectional study using routine DBS sample data from the NMRL in Harare, Zimbabwe, between January and December 2017.A total of 34 950 DBS samples were received at the NMRL. Of these, 1291(4%) were rejected. Reasons for rejection were insufficient specimen volume (72%), missing request form (11%), missing sample (6%), cross-contamination (6%), mismatch of information (4%) and clotted sample (1%). Samples collected from clinics/rural health facilities were five times more likely to be rejected compared to those from a central hospital. Rejection rates were above the set target of <2%. The reasons for rejection were 'pre-analytical' errors including labelling errors, missing or inconsistent data, and insufficient blood collected. Samples collected at primary healthcare facilities had higher rejection rates.