Maternal risk factors for testicular cancer: a population-based case-control study (UK).

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of a range of maternal and pre-natal characteristics as potential risk factors for testicular cancer. METHODS: A population-based case-control study of testicular cancer. Mothers of participants completed a questionnaire about their reproductive and obstetric history. RESULTS: The risk of testicular cancer was approximately doubled for sons of mothers aged 15-19 years at conception compared with mothers with older ages at conception. Nausea or vomiting during the first trimester of pregnancy was associated with a reduced risk of testicular cancer (odds ratio of 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.53-1.00). There was also a borderline reduction in risk in men who had been breastfed for 6 months or more (odds ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.41-1.04). Men who had low birthweights (< 2500 g) or had been born two or more weeks early had slightly increased risks, as did men whose mothers had used oral contraception in the 12 months before their conception. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support previous reports of increased risks in men born early or with low birthweight, but the direction of the association with maternal age is contrary to some other studies. The suggestion of a protective effect of breastfeeding requires further confirmation.

Post menopausal hormone replacement therapy and risk of acute myocardial infarction--a case control study of women in the East Midlands, UK.

AIMS: To examine the relationship between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) adjusting for coronary risk factors and social and behavioural confounders that might indicate a healthy user effect and could account for the discrepancy between randomized and observational studies of HRT use. METHODS: A case-control study of 864 women aged between 35-65 suffering an AMI with two age matched community controls from the same geographical area. Information was collected by interview and from general practitioner records. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) adjusted for diabetes, hypertension, smoking, alcohol, social class, family history and a health conscious behaviour score. RESULTS: HRT use was recorded for 34% of non-fatal AMI cases and 39% of controls with the adjusted OR for ever-use of HRT versus never-use being 0.74 (95% CI 0.55-0.99). The pattern of risk of AMI was similar for oestrogen only and combined HRT. During the first 12 months of HRT use there was a small increase in risk of AMI with the adjusted OR being 1.14 (0.72-1.80). HRT use for 13-60 months was associated with a small reduction in AMI risk (adjusted OR 0.85, 0.55-1.29). Only HRT used for >60 months was associated with a substantial risk reduction (adjusted OR 0.42, 0.24-0.73). Data for deceased cases and controls showed a similar pattern. CONCLUSIONS: HRT use whether as oestrogen only or combined hormones was only associated with a significant reduction in risk when used for greater than 60 months. These findings could reflect a dual effect of HRT on AMI risk by prothrombotic and anti-atherogenic mechanisms. Neither oestrogen only or combined HRT can be recommended for prevention of coronary artery disease.

Counseling versus antidepressant therapy for the treatment of mild to moderate depression in primary care: economic analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of generic psychological therapy (counseling) with routinely prescribed antidepressant drugs in a naturalistic general practice setting for a follow-up period of 12 months. METHODS: Economic analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial with patient preference arm. Comparison of depression-related health service costs at 12 months. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bootstrapped trial data using net monetary benefits and acceptability curves. RESULTS: No significant difference between the mean observed costs of patients randomized to antidepressants or to counseling (342 pounds sterling vs 302 pounds sterling , p = .56 [t test]). If decision makers are not willing to pay more for additional benefits (value placed on extra patient with good outcome, denoted by K, is zero), then we find little difference between the treatment modalities in terms of cost-effectiveness. If decision makers do place value on additional benefit (K > 0 pounds sterling), then the antidepressant group becomes more likely to be cost-effective. This likelihood is in excess of 90% where decision makers are prepared to pay an additional 2,000 pounds sterling or more per additional patient with a good global outcome. The mean values for incremental net monetary benefits (INMB) from antidepressants are substantial for higher values of K (INMB = 406 pounds sterling when K = 2,500 pounds sterling). CONCLUSION: For a small proportion of patients, the counseling intervention (as specified in this trial) is a dominant cost-effective strategy. For a larger proportion of patients, the antidepressant intervention (as specified in this trial) is the dominant cost-effective strategy. For the remaining group of patients, cost-effectiveness depends on the value of K. Since we cannot observe K, acceptability curves are a useful way to inform decision makers.