Surgical Care Through a Community Free Clinic-Ambulatory Surgical Center Partnership.

BACKGROUND: Disparities secondary to underinsurance present throughout the surgical care continuum. Community free clinics are uniquely capable to provide health care services to the medically underserved, but surgery often falls outside their scope of care. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted on consecutive community free clinic patients receiving free surgical services via referral to a partnering ambulatory surgery center between March 2016 and September 2021. Those with documented contact information were recruited 1-3 years post-procedure for long-term quality-of-life (LTQOL) outcomes assessment via modified Veterans RAND 12-item health survey. RESULTS: Of 142 included patients, 95.7% identified as Hispanic/Latino and 75.6% were uninsured. Twelve patients had cancerous or precancerous lesions detected and/or removed through diagnostic or definitive procedures. 3.5% experienced postoperative complication including bacterial (n = 2) or fungal (n = 1) surgical site infection and wound dehiscence (n = 2). With a 48.9% response rate, no significant differences in sociodemographic or clinical characteristics were found between surveyed vs non-surveyed patients. Of surveyed patients, 59.7% and 52.2% reported pre-/post-operative improvement in physical health and emotional health, respectively. DISCUSSION: Free diagnostic screening procedures provided timely diagnoses while free definitive surgeries safely and positively impacted long-term patient-reported physical health. Longitudinal, multidisciplinary follow-up and social support may be warranted to concurrently improve emotional and mental health in similarly underinsured populations.

Domestic firearm violence against women (2018-2021).

Background: Over 50 % of US female homicides occur during domestic violence, with half involving firearms. Public health measures to control COVID-19 may have isolated individuals with abusive partners at a time when firearm sales and new firearm ownership surged. This study sought to evaluate trends in domestic firearm violence (DFV) over time, hypothesizing that rates of DFV increased in the wake of COVID-19. Materials and methods: A retrospective query of the Gun Violence Archive (2018-2021) was conducted for incidents of DFV. The primary outcome was the number of DFV-related shootings. Statistical testing, including one-way and two-way ANOVAs, was performed to compare monthly rates of DFV over time and to compare DFV per 100,000 women in states with strong versus weak gun laws. Results: Average monthly DFV incidents rose nationwide during this study's time period, though injuries and fatalities did not. States with weaker gun laws had increased incidents, deaths, and injuries from 2018 to 2021 (all p<0.05). In a two-way ANOVA, stronger gun laws were associated with fewer incidents of DFV when compared with weaker gun law states. We also found that the use of a long gun in DFV more often resulted in a victim's death when compared to a handgun (p<0.01). Conclusion: DFV incidents increased over time. States with weaker gun laws bore the brunt of the violence, demonstrating that DFV may be curtailed through legislative efforts. Methods of injury prevention aimed at preventing and reducing domestic violence and improving firearm safety may curtail DFV.

Review of machine learning for optical imaging of burn wound severity assessment.

Significance: Over the past decade, machine learning (ML) algorithms have rapidly become much more widespread for numerous biomedical applications, including the diagnosis and categorization of disease and injury. Aim: Here, we seek to characterize the recent growth of ML techniques that use imaging data to classify burn wound severity and report on the accuracies of different approaches. Approach: To this end, we present a comprehensive literature review of preclinical and clinical studies using ML techniques to classify the severity of burn wounds. Results: The majority of these reports used digital color photographs as input data to the classification algorithms, but recently there has been an increasing prevalence of the use of ML approaches using input data from more advanced optical imaging modalities (e.g., multispectral and hyperspectral imaging, optical coherence tomography), in addition to multimodal techniques. The classification accuracy of the different methods is reported; it typically ranges from ∼70% to 90% relative to the current gold standard of clinical judgment. Conclusions: The field would benefit from systematic analysis of the effects of different input data modalities, training/testing sets, and ML classifiers on the reported accuracy. Despite this current limitation, ML-based algorithms show significant promise for assisting in objectively classifying burn wound severity.

Engaging Underrepresented Youth: Remote Transition of the Health Career Collaborative Program.

INTRODUCTION: Pipeline programs can help increase diversity in health care by engaging underrepresented minority groups to pursue higher education and training in medical fields. Here we describe the implementation of Health Career Collaborative, a pipeline program designed to connect high school students with health care professionals, and the transition to remote delivery of the curriculum. METHODS: This study is a retrospective, descriptive observational study where the baseline characteristics of participating students were evaluated via preparticipation surveys. This study took place in a community with an area deprivation index of 6 at a high school in southern California in conjunction with an academic medical center and level I trauma center. Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the program transitioned to a virtual setting in the second half of the academic year. RESULTS: A total of 37 high school student participants enrolled in the 2019-2020 Health Career Collaborative program, with over 97% identifying as Hispanic, 89% female, and 92% between the ages of 15 and 17. Ninety-five percent of students indicated plans to graduate from high school and attend college, and 89% agreed with having a mentor to help plan for their future. While high school students had exposure to several health topics prior to the program, students reported a preference to learn about health topics from doctors compared to other sources. CONCLUSIONS: An online platform helped facilitate more interaction with health care professionals and could improve feasibility of implementing pipeline programs because physical space and transportation are not required.

Maximizing wound coverage in full-thickness skin defects: A randomized-controlled trial of autologous skin cell suspension and widely meshed autograft versus standard autografting.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic insults, infection, and surgical procedures can leave skin defects that are not amenable to primary closure. Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is frequently used to achieve closure of these wounds. Although effective, STSG can be associated with donor site morbidity, compounding the burden of illness in patients undergoing soft tissue reconstruction procedures. With an expansion ratio of 1:80, autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) has been demonstrated to significantly decrease donor skin requirements compared with traditional STSG in burn injuries. We hypothesized that the clinical performance of ASCS would be similar for soft tissue reconstruction of nonburn wounds. METHODS: A multicenter, within-patient, evaluator-blinded, randomized-controlled trial was conducted of 65 patients with acute, nonthermal, full-thickness skin defects requiring autografting. For each patient, two treatment areas were randomly assigned to concurrently receive a predefined standard-of-care meshed STSG (control) or ASCS + more widely meshed STSG (ASCS+STSG). Coprimary endpoints were noninferiority of ASCS+STSG for complete treatment area closure by Week 8, and superiority for relative reduction in donor skin area. RESULTS: At 8 weeks, complete closure was observed for 58% of control areas compared with 65% of ASCS+STSG areas (p = 0.005), establishing noninferiority of ASCS+STSG. On average, 27.4% less donor skin was required with ASCS+ STSG, establishing superiority over control (p < 0.001). Clinical healing (≥95% reepithelialization) was achieved in 87% and 85% of Control and ASCS+STSG areas, respectively, at 8 weeks. The treatment approaches had similar long-term scarring outcomes and safety profiles, with no unanticipated events and no serious ASCS device-related events. CONCLUSION: ASCS+STSG represents a clinically effective and safe solution to reduce the amount of skin required to achieve definitive closure of full-thickness defects without compromising healing, scarring, or safety outcomes. This can lead to reduced donor site morbidity and potentially decreased cost associated with patient care.Clincaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04091672. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level I.

Relationship of Obesity and Severe Penetrating Thoracic and Abdominal Injuries in Adolescent Patients.

BACKGROUND: Over 20% of United States adolescents are obese. A thicker layer of subcutaneous adiposity might provide a protective "armor" layer against penetrating wounds. We hypothesized that adolescents with obesity presenting after isolated thoracic and abdominal penetrating trauma have lower rates of severe injury and mortality than adolescents without obesity. METHODS: The 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients between 12 and 17 years old presenting with knife or gunshot wounds. Patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 (obese) were compared to patients with BMI <30. Sub-analyses were performed for adolescents with isolated abdominal trauma and isolated thoracic trauma. Severe injury was defined as an abbreviated injury scale grade >3. Bivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: 12,181 patients were identified; 1603 (13.2%) had obesity. In isolated abdominal gunshot or knife wounds, rates of severe intra-abdominal injuries and mortality were similar (all P > .05) between groups. In isolated thoracic gunshot wounds, adolescents with obesity had a lower rate of severe thoracic injury (5.1% vs 13.4%, P = .005) but statistically similar mortality (2.2% vs 6.3%, P = .053) compared to adolescents without obesity. In isolated thoracic knife wounds, rates of severe thoracic injuries and mortality were similar (all P > .05) between groups. DISCUSSION: Adolescent trauma patients with and without obesity presenting after isolated abdominal or thoracic knife wounds had similar rates of severe injury, operative intervention, and mortality. However, adolescents with obesity presenting after an isolated thoracic gunshot wound had a lower rate of severe injury. This may impact the future work-up and management of adolescents sustaining isolated thoracic gunshot wounds.

Risk Factors for Unplanned Returns to the Operating Room in Pediatric Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Unplanned returns to the operating room (uROR) are associated with worse outcomes including increased complications and length of stay (LOS) in adults. However, the incidence and predictors of uROR for pediatric trauma patients (PTPs) are unknown. This study aimed to identify predictors of uROR for PTPs. METHODS: The 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for PTPs 1-16 years-old to compare patients with uROR to those without uROR. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: From 44 711 PTPs identified, 299 (.7%) underwent uROR. Pediatric trauma patients requiring uROR were older (14 vs 8 years old, P < .001), had a higher rate and associated risk of mortality (8.7% vs 1.4%, P < .001) (OR 6.67, CI 4.43-10.05, P < .001) as well as increased complications including surgical infection (16.4% vs .2%, P < .001) and compartment syndrome (4.7% vs .1%, P < .001). Patients undergoing uROR had increased LOS (18 vs 2 days, P < .001) and intensive care unit LOS (9 vs 3 days, P < .001). Independent associated risk factors for uROR included rectal injury (OR 4.54, CI 2.28-9.04, P < .001), brain injury (OR 3.68, CI 2.71-5.00, P < .001), and gunshot wounds (OR 2.55, CI 1.83-3.56, P < .001). DISCUSSION: The incidence of uROR was <1% for PTPs. However, patients requiring uROR had increased LOS and associated risk of death compared to those without uROR. Predictors of uROR included gunshot wounds and injuries to the rectum and brain. Patients with these risk factors should be counseled with efforts made to improve care for these high-risk populations.

Prospective single-center paradigm shift of surgical stabilization of rib fractures with decreased length of stay and operative time with an intrathoracic approach.

INTRODUCTION: Intrathoracic surgical stabilization of rib fractures allows for a novel approach to rib fracture repair. This approach can help minimize muscle disruption, which may improve patient recovery compared with traditional extrathoracic plating. We hypothesized patients undergoing intrathoracic plating (ITP) to have a shorter length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS compared with extrathoracic plating (ETP). METHODS: A prospective observational paradigm shift study was performed from November 2017 until September 2021. Patients 18 and older who underwent surgical stabilization of rib fractures were included. Patients with ahead Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥3 were excluded. Patients undergoing ETP (July 2017 to October 2019) were compared with ITP (November 2019 to September 2021) with Pearson χ 2 tests and Mann-Whitney U tests, with the primary outcome being LOS and ICU LOS. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were included, 59 (61%) underwent ETP and 37 (38%) underwent ITP. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (29%) followed by falls (23%). There were no differences between groups in age, comorbidities, insurance, discharge disposition and injury severity score (18 vs. 19, p = 0.89). Intrathoracic plating had a shorter LOS (10 days vs. 8 days, p = 0.04) when compared with ETP but no difference in ICU LOS (4 days vs. 3 days, p = 0.12) and ventilator days. Extrathoracic plating patients more commonly received epidural anesthesia (56% vs. 24%, p < 0.001) and intercostal nerve block (56% vs. 29%, p = 0.01) compared with ITP. However, there was no difference in median morphine equivalents between cohorts. Operative time was shorter for ITP with ETP (279 minutes vs. 188 minutes, p < 0.001) after adjusting for numbers of ribs fixed. CONCLUSION: In this single-center study, patients who underwent ITP had a decreased LOS and operative time in comparison to ETP in patients with similar injury severity. Future prospective multicenter research is needed to confirm these findings and may lead to further adoption of this minimally invasive technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Burn Clinic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to anxiety and fears for the general public. It is unclear how the behavior of people with acute burns and the services available to them has changed during the pandemic. The aim of our observational study was to evaluate our clinic's experience with patients presenting with burns during the first 10 months of the COVID-19 pandemic and determine if delays in presentation and healthcare delivery exist within our burn population. Patients referred to our clinic from March 1, 2020 to December 15, 2020 were reviewed for time of presentation after injury. We defined a true delay in presentation of >5 days from date of injury to date of referral for patients who were not inpatients at our facility or received initial care elsewhere prior to referral. Of the 246 patients who were referred to our clinic, during this time period, 199 patients (80.89%) attended their appointments. Our in-person clinic volume from referrals increased in July 2020 with a sharp decrease in August 2020. Our total clinic volume decreased in 2020 from 2019 by about 14%. Referrals to our clinic decreased in 2020 from 2019 by about 34%. Video telehealth visits did not account for the decrease in visits. There was low incidence of delays in presentation to our clinic during the pandemic. Additional investigation is necessary to see if the incidence of burn injury decreased. Despite the pandemic, our clinic remained ready and open to serve the burn population.

Blunt Trauma Mortality: Does Trauma Center Level Matter?

INTRODUCTION: Trauma centers have improved outcomes compared to nontrauma centers when caring for injured patients. A multicenter report found blunt trauma patients treated at American College of Surgeons' Level I trauma centers have improved survival compared to Level II centers. In a subsequent multicenter study, Level II centers had improved survival in all trauma patients. We sought to provide a more granular analysis by stratifying blunt mechanisms-to determine if there was a difference in mortality between Level I and Level II centers. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) was queried for patients presenting to an American College of Surgeons' Level I or II trauma center after blunt trauma. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed controlling for comorbidities and Trauma and Injury Severity Score. RESULTS: From 734,473 patients with blunt trauma, 507,715 (69.1%) were treated at a Level I center and 226,758 (30.9%) at a Level II center. The Level I cohort was younger (median age, 53 versus 58, P = 0.01), with a higher median injury severity score (13 versus 10, P < 0.001) and with more patients presenting after a motor vehicle accident (MVA) (27.9% versus 22.4%, P < 0.001) and lower rates of falls (46.6% versus 54.5%, P < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, there was no difference in mortality between Level I and Level II centers (P > 0.05). When stratifying by mechanisms, Level I centers had a decreased associated mortality for MVA (odds ratio = 0.94, CI: 0.88-0.99, P = 0.04) and bicycle accidents (odds ratio = 0.77, CI: 0.74-0.03, P = 0.01) but no difference in falls or pedestrians struck (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, blunt trauma patients presenting to a Level I center have no difference in mortality compared to a Level II center. However, when stratified by mechanism, those involved in MVA or bicycle accidents have a decreased associated risk of mortality. Future prospective studies examining variations in practice to account for these differences are warranted.

Alcohol is not associated with increased mortality in adolescent traumatic brain injury patients.

PURPOSE: Compared to adults, there is a paucity of data regarding the association of a positive alcohol screen (PAS) and outcomes in adolescent patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). We hypothesize adolescent TBI patients with a PAS on admission to have increased mortality compared to patients with a negative alcohol screen. METHODS: The 2017 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients aged 13-17 years presenting with a TBI and serum alcohol screen. Patients with missing information regarding midline shift on imaging and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression analysis for mortality was performed. RESULTS: From 2553 adolescent TBI patients with an alcohol screen, 220 (8.6%) had a PAS. Median injury severity scores and rates of penetrating trauma (all p > 0.05) were similar between alcohol positive and negative patients. Patients with a PAS had a similar mortality rate (13.2% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.64) compared to patients with a negative screen. Multivariate logistic regression controlling for risk factors associated with mortality revealed a PAS to confer a similar risk of mortality compared to alcohol negative patients (p = 0.40). CONCLUSION: Adolescent TBI patients with a PAS had similar associated risk of mortality compared to patients with a negative alcohol screen.

Coaching for impact: successful implementation of a multi-national, multi-institutional synchronous research course in Ethiopia.

Purpose: Under the American College of Surgeons' Operation Giving Back, several US institutions collaborated with a teaching and regional referral hospital in Ethiopia to develop a surgical research curriculum. Methods: A virtual, interactive, introductory research course which utilized a web-based classroom platform and live educational sessions via an online teleconferencing application was implemented. Surgical and public health faculty from the US and Ethiopia taught webinars and led breakout coaching sessions to facilitate participants' project development. Both a pre-course needs assessment survey and a post-course participation survey were used to examine the impact of the course. Results: Twenty participants were invited to participate in the course. Despite the majority of participants having connection issues (88%), 11 participants completed the course with an 83% average attendance rate. Ten participants successfully developed structured research proposals based on their local clinical needs. Conclusion: This novel multi-institutional and multi-national research course design was successfully implemented and could serve as a template for greater development of research capacity building in the low- and middle-income country (LMIC) setting.

Association of Risk of Mortality in Pediatric Patients Transferred From Scene by Helicopter With Major But Not Minor Injuries.

OBJECTIVES: Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) are used for 16% of pediatric trauma. National HEMS guidelines advised that triage criteria be standardized for pediatric patients. A national report found pediatric HEMS associated with decreased mortality compared with ground emergency medical services (GEMS) but did not control for transport time. We hypothesized that the rate of HEMS has decreased nationally and the mortality risk for HEMS to be similar when adjusting for transport time compared with GEMS. METHODS: The Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2014-2016) was queried for patients younger than 16 years transported by HEMS or GEMS. A multivariable logistic regression was used. RESULTS: From 25,647 patients, 4527 (17.7%) underwent HEMS. The rate of HEMS from scene decreased from 21.2% in 2014 to 18.2% in 2016. The rate of HEMS for minor trauma (Injury Severity Score <15) decreased from 14.9% in 2014 to 13.5% in 2016 and major trauma (Injury Severity Score > 15) from 38.4% in 2014 to 35.9% in 2016. After controlling for predictors of mortality and transport time, HEMS was associated with decreased risk of mortality for only those with major injuries transferred from scene (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.88; P = 0.01) compared with GEMS. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of HEMS in pediatric trauma has decreased. However, there is room for improvement as 14% of those with minor trauma are transported by HEMS. Given the similar risk of mortality compared with GEMS, further development of guidelines that avoid the unnecessary use of HEMS appears warranted. However, utilization of HEMS for transport of pediatric major trauma should continue.

No Difference in Morbidity or Mortality Between Octogenarians and Other Geriatric Burn Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Geriatric burn trauma patients (age ≥65 years) have a 5-fold higher mortality rate than younger adults. With the population of the US aging, the number of elderly burn and trauma patients is expected to increase. A past study using the National Burn Repository revealed a linear increase in mortality for those >65 years old. We hypothesized that octogenarians with burn and trauma injuries would have a higher rate of in-hospital complications and mortality, than patients aged 65-79 years old. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) was queried for burn trauma patients. To detect mortality risk a multivariable logistic regression model was used. RESULTS: From 282 patients, there were 73 (25.9%) octogenarians and 209 (74.1%) aged 65-79 years old. The two cohorts had similar median injury severity scores (16 vs. 15 in octogenarians, P = .81), total body surface area burned (P = .30), and comorbidities apart from an increased smoking (12.9% vs. 4.1%, P = .04) and decreased hypertension (52.2% vs. 65.8%, P = .04) in the younger cohort. Octogenarians had similar complications, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis (P > .05), and mortality (15.1% vs. 10.5%, P = .30), compared to the younger cohort. Octogenarians were not associated with an increased mortality risk (odds ratio 1.51, confidence interval 0.24-9.56, P = .67). DISCUSSION: Among burn trauma patients ≥65 years, age should not be a sole predictor for mortality risk. Continued research is necessary in order to determine more accurate approaches to prognosticate mortality in geriatric burn trauma patients, such as the validation and refinement of a burn-trauma-related frailty index.

Injury and Mortality Profiles in Level II and III Trauma Centers.

BACKGROUND: While the benefit of admission to trauma centers compared to non-trauma centers is well-documented and differences in outcomes between Level-I and Level-II trauma centers are well-studied, data on the differences in outcomes between Level-II trauma centers (L2TCs) and Level-III trauma centers (L3TCs) are scarce. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare mortality risk between patients admitted to L2TCs and L3TCs, hypothesizing no difference in mortality risk for patients treated at L3TCs compared to L2TCs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the 2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was performed. Patients aged 18+ years were divided into 2 groups, those treated at American College of Surgeons (ACS) verified L2TCs and L3TCs. RESULTS: From 74,486 patients included in this study, 74,187 (99.6%) were treated at L2TCs and 299 (.4%) at L3TCs. Both groups had similar median injury severity scores (ISSs) (10 vs 10, P < .001); however, L2TCs had a higher mean ISS (14.6 vs 11.9). There was a higher mortality rate for L2TC patients (6.0% vs 1.7%, P = .002) but no difference in associated risk of mortality between the 2 groups (OR .46, CI .14-1.50, P = .199) after adjusting predictors of mortality. L2TC patients had a longer median length of stay (5.0 vs 3.5 days, P < .001). There was no difference in other outcomes including myocardial infarction (MI) and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (P > .05). DISCUSSION: Patients treated at L2TCs had a longer LOS compared to L3TCs. However, after controlling for covariates, there was no difference in associated mortality risk between L2TC and L3TC patients.

Vices-paradox in trauma: Positive alcohol and drug screens associated with decreased mortality.

BACKGROUND: Improved survival in trauma patients with acute alcohol intoxication has been previously reported. The effect of illegal and controlled substances on mortality is less clear. We hypothesized that alcohol, illegal and controlled substances are each independently associated with lower odds of mortality in adult trauma patients. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) was queried for patients screening positive for alcohol, illegal or controlled substances on admission. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine odds of mortality. A similar analysis was used after stratification by injury severity scale (ISS). RESULTS: From 1,299,705 adult patients, 660,135 were screened for substance use. Of these patients, 497,872 were male, 227,995 (34.5 %) screened positive for alcohol, 155,437 (23.5 %) for illegal substances and 90,259 (13.7 %) for controlled substances. Mortality rate was 6.2 % with alcohol, 5.1 % with illegal substances, and 5.7 % with controlled substances compared to 8.0 % with no substance use (p < 0.001). After controlling for covariates, all groups had lower odds of mortality: alcohol (OR = 0.88, CI = 0.84-0.92, p < 0.001), illegal substances (OR = 0.83, CI = 0.77-0.90, p < 0.001), controlled substances (OR = 0.72, CI = 0.67-0.79, p < 0.001). When stratified by ISS, alcohol and illegal substances continued to be associated with decreased mortality until ISS 50. Controlled substances were associated with decreased mortality when ISS > 16. CONCLUSION: Patients positive for alcohol, illegal or controlled substances have 12 %, 17 %, and 28 % decreased odds of mortality, respectively. This paradoxical association should be confirmed with future clinical studies and merits basic science research to identify biochemical or physiological components conferring a protective effect on survival in trauma patients.

Regional, Racial, and Mortality Disparities Associated With Neurosurgeon Staffing at Level I Trauma Centers.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) occurs in approximately 30% of trauma patients. Because neurosurgeons hold expertise in treating TBI, increased neurosurgical staffing may improve patient outcomes. We hypothesized that TBI patients treated at level I trauma centers (L1TCs) with ≥3 neurosurgeons have a decreased risk of mortality vs. those treated at L1TCs with <3 neurosurgeons. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2010-2016) was queried for patients ≥18 years with TBI. Patient characteristics and mortality were compared between ≥3 and <3 neurosurgeon-staffed L1TCs. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: Traumatic brain injury occurred in 243 438 patients with 5188 (2%) presenting to L1TCs with <3 neurosurgeons and 238 250 (98%) to L1TCs with ≥3 neurosurgeons. Median injury severity score (ISS) was similar between both groups (17, P = .09). There were more Black (37% vs. 12%, P < .001) and Hispanic (18% vs. 12%, P < .001) patients in the <3 neurosurgeon group. Nearly 60% of L1TCs with <3 neurosurgeons are found in the South. Mortality was higher in the <3 vs. the ≥3 group (12% vs. 10%, P < .001). Patients treated in the <3 neurosurgeon group had a higher risk for mortality than those treated in the ≥3 neurosurgeon group (odds ratio (OR) 1.13, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.01-1.26, P = .028). DISCUSSION: There exists a significant racial disparity in access to neurosurgeon staffing with additional disparities in outcomes based on staffing. Future efforts are needed to improve this chasm of care that exists for trauma patients of color.

No difference in mortality between level I and level II trauma centers performing surgical stabilization of rib fracture.

BACKGROUND: A comparison of outcomes between Level I (LI) and Level II (LII) Trauma Centers (TCs) performing surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF) has not been well described. We sought to compare risk of mortality for patients undergoing SSRF between LI and LII TCs. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program was queried for patients presenting with rib fracture to LI or LII TCs from 2010 to 2015. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: 14,046 (7.1%) of 199,020 patients with rib fractures underwent SSRF. SSRF increased from 1304 in 2010 to 3489 in 2015: a geometric mean annual increase of 22%. LI TCs demonstrated a mortality incidence of 1.6% while LII TCs demonstrated a mortality incidence of 1.5% (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in risk of mortality after SSRF between LI and LII TCs (odds ratio 1.12, confidence interval 0.79-1.59, p-value 0.529). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing SSRF at LI and LII TCs have no significant difference in risk of mortality. Additionally, there is an annually growing trend across all centers in SSRF performed both for flail and non-flail segments.