Evaluation of the Accuracy of Standardized Uptake Values of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in Lung Lesions Based on Phantom Studies.

The aim of the study was to estimate the accuracy of standardized uptake values of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) in lung lesions during positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging, based on phantom studies performed for different PET/CT scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis of the PET/CT with 18F-FDG data was performed for 86 patients newly diagnosed with the lung lesions: malignant tumors (n=37), benign tumors and inflammatory diseases (n=49). The criteria for inclusion in the study were developed considering the recommendations of the Fleischner Society (2017). The characteristics of the lesions on CT met the following requirements: a round shape or close to it; total size of 8 to 30 mm; solid or subsolid structure (with the exception of lesion with ground-glass opacity); a solid part size of ≥8 mm. All the patients had no signs of pleurisy, lymphadenopathy, or cancer history. PET/CT imaging with 18F-FDG was performed with three scanners: Discovery 690 (General Electric, USA), Biograph mCT 128 (Siemens, Germany), and Biograph mCT 40 (Siemens); the preparation of patients prior to the scan was standardized. To determine the reference accumulation of a radiopharmaceutical in the pathological lesion, four scans of a specialized NEMA IEC PET Body Phantom Set (USA) were performed for each scanner. For each unit, the recovery coefficients (RCs) of radioactivity, maximum and recovered (corrected) standardized uptake values (SUVs) were determined. Statistical relationship between the size of lesions, SUVmax and SUVcorrect was evaluated. Data processing was performed using MedCalc v. 19.2.0 software. RESULTS: During the phantom study, the underestimation of the radioactivity was determined in the spheres with the diameters of 10 and 13 mm, overestimation was observed in the sphere with the diameter of 28 mm. Both underestimation and overestimation of radioactivity were determined for the spheres with a diameter of 17 and 22 mm.SUVmax differed from the reference values for 85 patients (98.8%). The underestimation of these values was found for 63 patients (73.2%) due to the partial volume effect. The greatest underestimation was observed for the patients with 8 mm diameter lesions. Depending on the scanner, the underestimation of the SUVmax in these patients reached up to 54-73%. For 9 patients (25%) with malignant tumors of 9-12 mm, the utility of RC made it possible to avoid false negative results. For the lesions with a diameter of 30 mm, an overestimation of SUVmax up to 22% was determined due to the negative influence of the reconstruction algorithms. CONCLUSION: The use of RC eliminates the influence of the partial volume effect and reconstruction methods on the accuracy of estimating the SUVmax in lung lesions, which ensures reproducibility, increase in the information content of the method, as well as the comparability of the results of PET/CT with 18F-FDG obtained on the different models of PET/CT units with different technological characteristics.

PROPOSALS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS FOR RADIOGRAPHY FOR ADULT PATIENTS BASED ON REGIONAL DOSE SURVEYS IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

In 2009-2014, dose surveys aimed to collect adult patient data and parameters of most common radiographic examinations were performed in six Russian regions. Typical patient doses were estimated for the selected examinations both in entrance surface dose and in effective dose. 75%-percentiles of typical patient effective dose distributions were proposed as preliminary regional diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for radiography. Differences between the 75%-percentiles of regional typical patient dose distributions did not exceed 30-50% for the examinations with standardized clinical protocols (skull, chest and thoracic spine) and a factor of 1.5 for other examinations. Two different approaches for establishing national DRLs were evaluated: as a 75%-percentile of a pooled regional sample of patient typical doses (pooled method) and as a median of 75%-percentiles of regional typical patient dose distributions (median method). Differences between pooled and median methods for effective dose did not exceed 20%. It was proposed to establish Russian national DRLs in effective dose using a pooled method. In addition, the local authorities were granted an opportunity to establish regional DRLs if the local radiological practice and typical patient dose distributions are significantly different.