Intermediate-term outcomes of the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in neovascular glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of the non-valved Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) in neovascular glaucoma (NVG). METHODS: Data of consecutive patients with NVG who underwent AADI and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative rate of surgical failure defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mm Hg or reduced <20% below baseline, IOP ≤5 mm Hg, reoperation for glaucoma or a complication, or loss of light perception vision. RESULTS: We included 85 eyes of 85 patients with NVG, with a mean age of 61.2±9.3 years. The most common aetiologies were proliferative diabetic retinopathy (n=43) and central retinal vein occlusion (n=24). The mean IOP decreased from 36.8±12.5 mm Hg at baseline to 15.8±7.5 mm Hg at 2-year follow-up (p<0.001) and the number of IOP-lowering medications reduced from 3.4±0.8 to 1.5±1.1 (p<0.001). The cumulative rate of failure increased from 3.1% (95% CI 1.1% to 11.8%) at 1 year to 33.8% (95% CI 20.4% to 52.5%) at 2 years. Multivariable analysis showed that eyes with open angles had a lower risk of failure (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.03, p=0.09). The logarithm of minimum angle of resolution visual acuity declined from 0.98±0.7 to 1.8±1.0 at 2 years (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of NVG eyes that received the AADI failed after 2 years of follow-up similar to other series. Early AADI implantation at the open angle stage of NVG may yield better results.

Surgical Outcomes of Superotemporal Versus Inferonasal Placement of Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant in Refractory Pediatric Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: We sought to describe the outcomes of the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) placed in the superotemporal (ST) versus the inferonasal (IN) quadrant in pediatric eyes with refractory glaucoma. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative interventional case series. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients ≤18 years of age who underwent AADI implantation and completed a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The choice of the quadrant depended upon the amount of scarring and conjunctival mobility. Cumulative success at 2 years was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤21 mm Hg or reduced by ≥20% below baseline on 2 consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, IOP ≤5 mm Hg on 2 consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, reoperation for glaucoma or a complication, or loss of light perception vision. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients (144 eyes) underwent AADI placement, including 48 eyes (33%) in the IN and 96 eyes (67%) in the ST quadrants. The IOP was significantly higher in the IN group (17.5 ± 7.4 mm Hg vs 13.7 ± 6.2 mm Hg, P = .005) with a greater number of medications (1.5 ± 1.0 vs 0.8 ± 0.9, P = .001) after 2 years of follow-up. Cumulative success rates at 2 years were 50.7% (95% confidence interval 35.4%-63.9%) in the IN group and 65.6% (95% confidence interval 56.5%-75.7%) in the ST group (P = .15). Complications occurred more frequently in the IN group, with significantly more tube exposure (12% vs 0%, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of the AADI in the ST quadrant has better IOP-related outcomes and is a safer surgical option in pediatric eyes compared with the IN quadrant. It may be prudent to avoid AADI in the IN quadrant in children unless the ST location is not a viable option.