RESUMO
To investigate the possibility of an association between the type of pathology caused by HTLV-I and the activity of its promoter, we compared the levels of transcription obtained with six LTRs isolated from patients with two different HTLV-I-related diseases: ATL and TSP/HAM. The patients came from different geographical endemic areas. The LTR region was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from the DNA of uncultured peripheral blood lymphocytes, and directly cloned upstream of the luciferase reporter gene. Constructs were tested by a transient transfection assay in a variety of cell lines. Although the activities of these LTRs were statistically different in some of the cell lines tested, no correlation could be demonstrated between the promoter activity and the nature of the disease. Thus, the data suggest that the LTR is not a major determinant of the nature of the disease associated with the infection by HTLV-I.
Assuntos
Vírus Linfotrópico T Tipo 1 Humano/genética , Leucemia-Linfoma de Células T do Adulto/microbiologia , Paraparesia Espástica Tropical/microbiologia , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas , Sequências Repetitivas de Ácido Nucleico/genética , Análise de Variância , Animais , Sequência de Bases , Linhagem Celular , Clonagem Molecular , DNA Viral , Células HeLa , Humanos , Camundongos , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Células Tumorais CultivadasRESUMO
Human T-cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I) is associated with a large spectrum of clinical manifestations in man. Viral and host factors are probably involved in determining the consequences of infection. Although most of the genome of HTLV-I appears remarkably stable, considerable variation is observed in the long terminal repeat (LTR) which harbors the promoter region. So far, no correlation between specific mutations and pathogenesis has been found, and the current opinion is that sequence variations reflect the geographical origin of the isolate more than the associated pathology. To assess whether the mutations observed between two HTLV-I LTRs were functionally significant, two LTRs, which differ by ten mutations, were coupled to the highly sensitive eukaryotic luciferase-encoding reporter gene, luc, and tested by transfection in a variety of cell lines. Marked differences in promoter activity were observed in some of the cells tested, whereas in other both LTRs were equally active. This result demonstrates that the minor differences observed between two HTLV-I LTRs can affect the activity level of the promoter in some cellular environments, a result which could point to the LTR as one determinant of HTLV-I cell tropism in vivo.
