Characterizing biological products and assessing comparability following manufacturing changes.

Changes in production methods of a biological product may necessitate an assessment of comparability to ensure that these manufacturing changes have not affected the safety, identity, purity, or efficacy of the product. Depending on the nature of the protein or the change, this assessment consists of a hierarchy of sequential tests in analytical testing, preclinical animal studies and clinical studies. Differences in analytical test results between pre- and post-change products may require functional testing to establish the biological or clinical significance of the observed difference. An underlying principle of comparability is that under certain conditions, protein products may be considered comparable on the basis of analytical testing results alone. However, the ability to compare biological materials is solely dependent on the tests used, since no single analytical method is able to compare every aspect of protein structure or function. The advantages and disadvantages of any given method depends on the protein property being characterized.

Minimizing the immunogenicity of protein therapeutics.

As is cautioned in many package inserts, 'with all therapeutic proteins, there is a potential for immunogenicity'. Immunogenicity problems in humans, which currently can be detected only in clinical trials or after product launch, pose a significant barrier to the development and acceptance of protein drugs. Recent and ongoing research, presented in this review, seeks to address the challenge of protein therapeutic immunogenicity by elucidating the mechanisms underlying immune recognition of protein therapeutics, establishing preclinical methods for assessing immunogenicity and developing strategies for minimizing immune responses.

Inactivation of TNF signaling by rationally designed dominant-negative TNF variants.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a key regulator of inflammatory responses and has been implicated in many pathological conditions. We used structure-based design to engineer variant TNF proteins that rapidly form heterotrimers with native TNF to give complexes that neither bind to nor stimulate signaling through TNF receptors. Thus, TNF is inactivated by sequestration. Dominant-negative TNFs represent a possible approach to anti-inflammatory biotherapeutics, and experiments in animal models show that the strategy can attenuate TNF-mediated pathology. Similar rational design could be used to engineer inhibitors of additional TNF superfamily cytokines as well as other multimeric ligands.

Rational design and engineering of therapeutic proteins.

An increasing number of engineered protein therapeutics are currently being developed, tested in clinical trials and marketed for use. Many of these proteins arose out of hit-and-miss efforts to discover specific mutations, fusion partners or chemical modifications that confer desired properties. Through these efforts, several useful strategies have emerged for rational optimization of therapeutic candidates. The controlled manipulation of the physical, chemical and biological properties of proteins enabled by structure-based simulation is now being used to refine established rational engineering approaches and to advance new strategies. These methods provide clear, hypothesis-driven routes to solve problems that plague many proteins and to create novel mechanisms of action. We anticipate that rational protein engineering will shape the field of protein therapeutics dramatically by improving existing products and enabling the development of novel therapeutic agents.