Pulmonary Functional Outcomes at 3 Months in Critical COVID-19 Survivors Hospitalized during the First, Second, and Third Pandemic Waves.

INTRODUCTION: Despite improved management of patients with COVID-19, we still ignore whether pharmacologic treatments and improved respiratory support have modified outcomes for intensive care unit (ICU) surviving patients of the three first consecutive waves (w) of the pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether developments in the management of ICU COVID-19 patients have positively impacted respiratory functional outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and chest CT scan patterns in ICU COVID-19 surviving patients at 3 months, according to pandemic waves. METHODS: We prospectively included all patients admitted to the ICU of two university hospitals with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) related to COVID-19. Data related to hospitalization (disease severity, complications), demographics, and medical history were collected. Patients were assessed 3 months post-ICU discharge using a 6 min walking distance test (6MWT), a pulmonary function test (PFT), a respiratory muscle strength (RMS) test, a chest CT scan, and a Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. RESULTS: We included 84 ARDS COVID-19 surviving patients. Disease severity, complications, demographics, and comorbidities were similar between groups, but there were more women in wave 3 (w3). Length of stay at the hospital was shorter during w3 vs. during wave 1 (w1) (23.4 ± 14.2 days vs. 34.7 ± 20.8 days, p = 0.0304). Fewer patients required mechanical ventilation (MV) during the second wave (w2) vs. during w1 (33.3% vs. 63.9%, p = 0.0038). Assessment at 3 months after ICU discharge revealed that PFTs and 6MWTs scores were worse for w3 > w2 > w1. QoL (SF-36) deteriorated (vitality and mental health) more for patients in w1 vs. in w3 (64.7 ± 16.3 vs. 49.2 ± 23.2, p = 0.0169). Mechanical ventilation was associated with reduced forced expiratory volume (FEV1), total lung capacity (TLC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and respiratory muscle strength (RMS) (w1,2,3, p < 0.0500) on linear/logistic regression analysis. The use of glucocorticoids, as well as tocilizumab, was associated with improvements in the number of affected segments in chest CT, FEV1, TLC, and DLCO (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: With better understanding and management of COVID-19, there was an improvement in PFT, 6MWT, and RMS in ICU survivors 3 months after ICU discharge, regardless of the pandemic wave during which they were hospitalized. However, immunomodulation and improved best practices for the management of COVID-19 do not appear to be sufficient to prevent significant morbidity in critically ill patients.

Health-Related Quality of Life Improves in Parallel with FEV1 and 6-Minute Walking Distance Test at Between 3 and 12 Months in Critical COVID-19 Survivors.

Background: In COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU)-admitted patients, multiorgan acute complications lead to long-lasting sequelae. The aim of this study was to assess (1) changes in chest CT, pulmonary function test (PFT), functional capacity (6-minute walking distance test (6MWT)), and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) among ICU COVID-19 survivors at 3, 6, and 12 months after ICU discharge and (2) predictors of persistent impairment/improvement in 6MWT and HR-QoL. Methods: ICU COVID-19 survivors were prospectively included. Outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months included PFT, 6MWT, respiratory muscle strength (RMS), HR-QoL (SF-36), Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC), and post-COVID Functional Status scale. Results: Eighty-seven survivors were included, from June 3, 2020, to September 2, 2021. At 12 months, 50% of PFT were normal, 46% were restrictive, and 22% showed reduced diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Impaired DLCO was associated with ICU length of stay and age. In mixed linear model analysis, improvements in RMS and mMRC persisted over time regardless of the adjustments applied (P ≤ .050). SF-36 improved in parallel with FEV1 and 6MWT between 3 and 12 months (P ≤ .044), while increment in DLCO correlated with changes in FEV1 and total lung capacity (TLC) (p ≤ 0.026). Conclusions: This longitudinal study demonstrated that improvements in SF-36 occur in parallel with improvements in FEV1 and 6MWT between 3 and 12 months post-ICU discharge in a sample of critically ill COVID-19 patients. However, PFT remained, however, abnormal in 50% of patients. Based on continued improvements observed from 3 to 12 months, it is anticipated that COVID-19 ICU patients will continue to recover similarly to ARDS patients.

Relationship between the sensation of activity limitation and the results of functional assessment in asthma patients.

OBJECTIVE: In asthma patients, the assessment of activity limitation is based on questions evaluating how limited the patient feels in their activities. However, the lack of functional data complicates the interpretation of the answers. We aimed to evaluate the intensity of relationships between the patient's perception of activity limitation and the results of several functional tests. METHODS: Twenty patients complaining of asthma exacerbation were invited to complete three scores (Chronic Respiratory Disease questionnaire, Asthma Control Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale). They also underwent lung function measurements, a 6-minute walk test and a cardio-pulmonary exercise test. In addition, physical activity was studied by actigraphy. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between the patient's perception of activity limitation and each of the other parameters were analysed. RESULTS: Five parameters were significantly correlated with the perception of activity limitation: ACQ question 4, related to dyspnea (rs 0.74, p < 0.001); Emotion domain of the Chronic Respiratory Disease questionnaire (rs -0.57, p = 0.02); HAD anxiety (rs 0.48, p = 0.032); HAD depression (rs 0.46, p = 0.041); ACQ question 6, related to reliever use (rs 0.46, p = 0.046). No parameters from the lung function test, 6MWT, CPET or actigraphy, were significantly correlated with the perception of activity limitation. CONCLUSIONS: In response to questions about limitation of activity, patients do not specifically answer mentioning physical limitation but rather the psychological burden associated with this constraint.