Focused cardiac ultrasound training: how much is enough?

BACKGROUND: Focused transthoracic echocardiography (F-TTE) is an important tool to assess hemodynamically unstable patients in the Emergency Department. Although its scope has been defined by the American College of Emergency Physicians, more research is needed to define an optimal F-TTE training program, including assessment of proficiency. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of current standards in post-residency training to reach proficiency in F-TTE. METHODS: Fourteen staff Emergency Physicians were enrolled in a standardized teaching curriculum specifically designed to meet the 2008 American College of Emergency Physicians' guidelines for general ultrasound training applied to echocardiography. This training program consisted of 6 h of didactics and 6 h of scanning training, followed by independent scanning over a 5-month period. Acquisition of echocardiographic knowledge was assessed by an online pre- and post-test. At the conclusion of the study, a hands-on skills test assessed the trainees' ability to perform and interpret F-TTE. RESULTS: Ninety percent of trainees passed the written post-test. Two views, the parasternal long and short axis, were easily obtainable, regardless of the level of training or the number of ultrasounds completed. Other views were more difficult to master, but strong trends toward increased competency were evident after 10 h of mixed didactic and scanning training and > 45 ultrasounds. CONCLUSIONS: A short, 12-h didactic training in F-TTE provided proficiency in image interpretation and in obtaining adequate images from the parasternal window. More extensive training is needed to master the apical and subcostal windows in a timely manner.

Comparison of oral aspirin versus topical applied methyl salicylate for platelet inhibition.

BACKGROUND: Oral acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) is the primary antiplatelet therapy in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome. Methyl salicylate (MS; oil of wintergreen) is compounded into many over-the-counter antiinflammatory muscle preparations and has been shown to inhibit platelet aggregation locally and to be absorbed systemically. OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of topically applied MS to inhibit systemic platelet aggregation for patients who are unable to tolerate oral drug therapy. METHODS: A randomized, prospective, blinded, crossover study was conducted in 9 healthy men, aged 30-46 years. All subjects ingested 162 mg of aspirin or applied 5 g of 30% MS preparation to their anterior thighs. There was a minimum 2-week washout period between study arms. Blood and urine were collected at baseline and at 6 hours. An aggregometer measured platelet aggregation over time against 5 standard concentrations of epinephrine, and a mean area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Urinary metabolites of thromboxane B(2) were measured by a standard enzyme immunoassay. Differences in and between groups at baseline and 6 hours were tested by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Baseline platelet aggregation did not differ significantly between the 2 arms of the study (median AUC [% aggregation(*)min]; binominal confidence intervals): aspirin 183; 139 to 292 versus MS 197; 118 to 445 (p = 0.51). Both aspirin and MS produced statistically significant platelet inhibition; aspirin decreased the AUC from 183; 139 to 292 to 85; 48 to 128 (p = 0.008) and MS decreased the AUC from 197; 118 to 445 to 112; 88 to 306 (p = 0.011). No significant difference was detected between baseline and 6-hour thromboxane levels for either aspirin (p = 0.779) or MS (p = 0.327). CONCLUSIONS: Topical MS and oral aspirin both significantly decrease platelet aggregation in healthy human volunteers.

Naturally occurring IgM anti-leukocyte autoantibodies (IgM-ALA) inhibit T cell activation and chemotaxis.

The physiological relevance of naturally occurring IgM-ALA remains to be elucidated. These autoantibodies are present from birth and increase in diverse inflammatory states that are both infectious and noninfectious. Clinical observations showing significantly less acute allograft rejections in recipients having high IgM-ALA levels, led us to investigate whether IgM-ALA could have a functional role in attenuating T cell mediated inflammatory responses. In pursuit of this hypothesis, we did studies using IgM purified from the serum of normal individuals, patients with end stage renal disease, and HIV-1 infection. All preparations of IgM immunoprecipitated certain receptors e.g., CD3, CD4, CCR5, and CXCR4 from whole cell lysates but failed to immunoprecipitate IL-2R and HLA Ags. In physiological doses IgM down-regulated CD4, CD2 and CD86 but not CD8 and CD28, inhibited T cell proliferation, decreased production of certain proinflammatory cytokines e.g., TNF-alpha, IL-13 and IL-2, but not IFN- gamma, IL-1beta, GM-CSF, IL-6 and IL-8 and inhibited leukocyte chemotaxis. These inhibitory effects were more pronounced when using IgM from patients with high levels of IgM-ALA and these inhibitory effects were significantly reduced after using IgM preabsorbed with leukocytes. IgM-ALA binding to leukocytes was found to be highly specific, as <10% of IgM secreting B cell clones had IgM-ALA specificity with some clones having specificity for either T cells or monocytes. These findings support the concept that IgM-ALA provides an innate mechanism to regulate T cell mediated inflammatory responses.

Comparison of electrophysiologic monitors with clinical assessment of level of sedation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the correlation between 2 clinical sedation scales and 2 electroencephalographic (EEG)-based monitors used during surgical procedures that required mild to moderate sedation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective surgery participated in this Institutional review board-approved study from March 2003 to February 2004. Level of sedation was determined both clinically using the Ramsay and the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scales and with 2 EEG measures (the Bispectral Index version XP [BIS XP] or the Patient State Analyzer [PSA 4000]). Correlation between these 2 measures of sedation were tested using nonparametric statistical tests. RESULTS: The BIS XP monitor was used in 26 patients, and the PSA 4000 monitor was used in 24 patients. The Ramsay and Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scores correlated with each other (r = -0.96; P < .001) and with both the BIS XP (r = -0.89 and r = 0.91, respectively; P < .001) and the PSA 4000 (r = -0.80 and r = 0.80, respectively; P < .001) values. However, this correlation was strongest only at the extremes. Between the BIS XP and PSA 4000 values of 61 and 80, the clinical sedation scores varied greatly. CONCLUSION: On the basis of our results, these EEG-based monitors cannot reliably distinguish between light and deep sedation.