Efficacy of rigid-angle bronchial blockers for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic tumor resection.

Background: For uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), which is greatly dependent on satisfactory lung collapse without lung compression from another port, few reports have elucidated the intraoperative efficacy of bronchial blockers (BBs). We hypothesized that operation time would be prolonged if BBs required more intraoperative repositioning during surgical manipulation. We compared the operation times of different surgical procedures performed using BBs with double-lumen tubes (DLTs) in uniportal VATS. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent intubated uniportal VATS were enrolled retrospectively from March to May 2019. Data on the patient, anesthetic, and surgical factors were collected. Regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of various factors on operation time. Results: 317 patients who underwent uniportal VATS were included. Wedge resection constituted 70.7%, and anatomic resection constituted 29.3% of procedures. BBs were applied for left- and right-side wedge resection (85.6% and 78.7%, respectively) and left- and right-side anatomic resection (74.1% and 56.4%, respectively). The surgical factors significantly affecting operation time were operation procedures (P < .01), number of lymph nodes sampled (P < .001), and size of tumors (P < .01). Conclusions: The efficacy of BBs was comparable to that of DLTs for uniportal VATS wedge resection. With significantly less preference for right-side anatomic resection, the efficacy of DLTs was comparable with that of BBs, which were applied in more than half of right-side uniportal anatomic VATS. We conclude that even in uniportal VATSs, rigid-angled BBs demonstrate comparable efficacy with feasible alternatives.

Implications of Continuous Noninvasive Finger Cuff Arterial Pressure Device Use during Cesarean Delivery for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Preload Optimization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although fixed-volume conventional fluid preloading protocol fails to attenuate postspinal hypotension during cesarean delivery, the effect of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) remains less explored. Continuous noninvasive finger cuff arterial pressure monitoring using devices such as the ClearSight System can provide the noninvasive stroke volume value, enabling clinicians to perform GDFT before spinal anesthesia; however, the efficacy of GDFT requires further elucidation. METHOD: In total, 71 consecutive full-term pregnant women were randomly divided into a control group (n = 34) and a GDFT group (n = 37). Before spinal anesthesia, the control group received a fixed dose (1000 mL) of crystalloid fluid, but the GDFT group received repeated 3 mL/kg body weight of crystalloid fluid challenges within 3 minutes with a 1-minute interval between each fluid challenge based on the stroke volume incremental changes obtained using the ClearSight System (targeting a stroke volume increase of ≥5% after a fluid challenge). The primary outcome was the incidence of postspinal hypotension. The secondary outcomes were total fluid volume, vasopressor dosage, hemodynamic parameter changes, maternal adverse effects, and neonatal profiles. RESULT: Women in the GDFT group received more fluid than did those in the control group (1132 ± 108 vs. 1247 ± 202 mL; p = 0.0044), but the incidence of postspinal hypotension (79.4% vs. 73.0%,; p = 0.5864) and norepinephrine dose (12.5 ± 10.6 vs. 15.1 ± 12.8 mcg, respectively; p = 0.3512) was comparable between the two groups. Fewer women in the GDFT group experienced nausea (61.76% vs. 35.14%; p = 0.0332). Neonatal outcomes (Apgar score and umbilical blood analysis) were comparable and typical in both groups. CONCLUSION: ClearSight-guided GDFT did not ameliorate postspinal hypotension but may reduce nausea. This trial is registered with NCT03013140.