[The role of kidney transplantation in reducing mortality in a chronic dialysis program]. / Trasplante renal y disminución de la mortalidad en los programas de diálisis crónica.

For patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), kidney transplant (KT) is a better alternative to dialysis in terms of survival, life quality and costs. We studied the general characteristics, causes and survival rate of the dialysis population in 2010. We evaluated broader criteria for acceptance of transplants has affected the results of the procedure in that period. A total of 118 dialysis patients were included; mean age 56.9 ± 18.4 years, dialysis duration 45.5 ± 59.6 months, main cause of CRF was diabetes in 35 (30%), and 58 (49%) were included in waiting list for KT. Of the 34 patients who finished dialysis in 2010, 18 (53%) were KT, while 12 (35%) died (cardiovascular 50%, infectious 17%). Survival at 12 months was 85% for the total group, 98% on waiting list and 72% those who were not enrolled. During 2010 there were 88 KT, 62 with cadaveric donors (CD), 18 with living donors and 8 with double pancreas-kidney transplants. Recipients of CD were 50.7 years old, with 67 months on dialysis, 8 (13%) diabetics, and 12 (20%) with previous KT. Donors had a mean age of 45 years, 28 (45%) expanded criteria, and 27.7 hours of cold ischemia time. During an approximate follow-up of 11.4 months, 13 (21%) suffered acute graft rejection, survival was 88% for graft and 93% for patients. We emphasize KT as the main cause of success as regards dialysis. No differences in risk factors were found to significantly affect graft or patient survival.

Trasplante renal y disminución de la mortalidad en los programas de diálisis crónica / The role of kidney transplantation in reducing mortality in a chronic dialysis program

El trasplante renal (TR) presenta mejor supervivencia, calidad de vida y costos que la diálisis en la insuficiencia renal crónica (IRC). Estudiamos pacientes en diálisis que recibieron TR durante 2010, las causas de finalización del tratamiento y la supervivencia en diálisis. Evaluamos si criterios más amplios para la aceptación de trasplantes hubieran afectado los resultados del procedimiento en ese período. Incluimos 118 pacientes en diálisis, edad media 56.9 ± 18.4 años, tiempo en diálisis 45.5 ± 59.6 meses, 35 (30%) presentaban diabetes como causa de IRC, y 58 (49%) estaban en espera del TR. Treinta y cuatro finalizaron diálisis, 18 por TR y 12 por fallecimiento. Las principales causas de muerte fueron cardiovasculares, 6 (50%) e infecciones, 2 (17%). La supervivencia al año fue 85% para el grupo total, 98% para los pacientes inscriptos en lista de espera y 72% para no inscriptos. Durante 2010 se realizaron 88 TR (62 con donantes cadavéricos [DC], 18 donantes vivos y 8 dobles trasplantes páncreas-riñón). Los receptores de DC tenían en promedio 50.7 años, 67 meses en diálisis, 8 (13%) eran diabéticos, 12 (20%) con TR previos y 3 cross match contra panel de anticuerpos > 20%. Los donantes tenían edad media 45 años, 28 (45%) con criterios expandidos y 27.7 h de isquemia fría. A los 11.4 meses de seguimiento, 13 (21%) presentó rechazo agudo, la supervivencia para injerto fue de 88% y 93% para pacientes. La principal causa de finalización de diálisis fue TR, sin detectarse que el empleo de DC afectara la supervivencia del TR.

For patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), kidney transplant (KT) is a better alternative to dialysis in terms of survival, life quality and costs. We studied the general characteristics, causes and survival rate of the dialysis population in 2010. We evaluated broader criteria for acceptance of transplants has affected the results of the procedure in that period. A total of 118 dialysis patients were included; mean age 56.9 ± 18.4 years, dialysis duration 45.5 ± 59.6 months, main cause of CRF was diabetes in 35 (30%), and 58 (49%) were included in waiting list for KT. Of the 34 patients who finished dialysis in 2010, 18 (53%) were KT, while 12 (35%) died (cardiovascular 50%, infectious 17%). Survival at 12 months was 85% for the total group, 98% on waiting list and 72% those who were not enrolled. During 2010 there were 88 KT, 62 with cadaveric donors (CD), 18 with living donors and 8 with double pancreas-kidney transplants. Recipients of CD were 50.7 years old, with 67 months on dialysis, 8 (13%) diabetics, and 12 (20%) with previous KT. Donors had a mean age of 45 years, 28 (45%) expanded criteria, and 27.7 hours of cold ischemia time. During an approximate follow-up of 11.4 months, 13 (21%) suffered acute graft rejection, survival was 88% for graft and 93% for patients. We emphasize KT as the main cause of success as regards dialysis. No differences in risk factors were found to significantly affect graft or patient survival.

Trasplante renal y disminución de la mortalidad en los programas de diálisis crónica / The role of kidney transplantation in reducing mortality in a chronic dialysis program

El trasplante renal (TR) presenta mejor supervivencia, calidad de vida y costos que la diálisis en la insuficiencia renal crónica (IRC). Estudiamos pacientes en diálisis que recibieron TR durante 2010, las causas de finalización del tratamiento y la supervivencia en diálisis. Evaluamos si criterios más amplios para la aceptación de trasplantes hubieran afectado los resultados del procedimiento en ese período. Incluimos 118 pacientes en diálisis, edad media 56.9 ± 18.4 años, tiempo en diálisis 45.5 ± 59.6 meses, 35 (30%) presentaban diabetes como causa de IRC, y 58 (49%) estaban en espera del TR. Treinta y cuatro finalizaron diálisis, 18 por TR y 12 por fallecimiento. Las principales causas de muerte fueron cardiovasculares, 6 (50%) e infecciones, 2 (17%). La supervivencia al año fue 85% para el grupo total, 98% para los pacientes inscriptos en lista de espera y 72% para no inscriptos. Durante 2010 se realizaron 88 TR (62 con donantes cadavéricos [DC], 18 donantes vivos y 8 dobles trasplantes páncreas-riñón). Los receptores de DC tenían en promedio 50.7 años, 67 meses en diálisis, 8 (13%) eran diabéticos, 12 (20%) con TR previos y 3 cross match contra panel de anticuerpos > 20%. Los donantes tenían edad media 45 años, 28 (45%) con criterios expandidos y 27.7 h de isquemia fría. A los 11.4 meses de seguimiento, 13 (21%) presentó rechazo agudo, la supervivencia para injerto fue de 88% y 93% para pacientes. La principal causa de finalización de diálisis fue TR, sin detectarse que el empleo de DC afectara la supervivencia del TR.(AU)

For patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), kidney transplant (KT) is a better alternative to dialysis in terms of survival, life quality and costs. We studied the general characteristics, causes and survival rate of the dialysis population in 2010. We evaluated broader criteria for acceptance of transplants has affected the results of the procedure in that period. A total of 118 dialysis patients were included; mean age 56.9 ± 18.4 years, dialysis duration 45.5 ± 59.6 months, main cause of CRF was diabetes in 35 (30%), and 58 (49%) were included in waiting list for KT. Of the 34 patients who finished dialysis in 2010, 18 (53%) were KT, while 12 (35%) died (cardiovascular 50%, infectious 17%). Survival at 12 months was 85% for the total group, 98% on waiting list and 72% those who were not enrolled. During 2010 there were 88 KT, 62 with cadaveric donors (CD), 18 with living donors and 8 with double pancreas-kidney transplants. Recipients of CD were 50.7 years old, with 67 months on dialysis, 8 (13%) diabetics, and 12 (20%) with previous KT. Donors had a mean age of 45 years, 28 (45%) expanded criteria, and 27.7 hours of cold ischemia time. During an approximate follow-up of 11.4 months, 13 (21%) suffered acute graft rejection, survival was 88% for graft and 93% for patients. We emphasize KT as the main cause of success as regards dialysis. No differences in risk factors were found to significantly affect graft or patient survival.(AU)

Trasplante renal y disminución de la mortalidad en los programas de diálisis crónica. / [The role of kidney transplantation in reducing mortality in a chronic dialysis program].

For patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), kidney transplant (KT) is a better alternative to dialysis in terms of survival, life quality and costs. We studied the general characteristics, causes and survival rate of the dialysis population in 2010. We evaluated broader criteria for acceptance of transplants has affected the results of the procedure in that period. A total of 118 dialysis patients were included; mean age 56.9 ± 18.4 years, dialysis duration 45.5 ± 59.6 months, main cause of CRF was diabetes in 35 (30

), and 58 (49

) were included in waiting list for KT. Of the 34 patients who finished dialysis in 2010, 18 (53

) were KT, while 12 (35

) died (cardiovascular 50

, infectious 17

). Survival at 12 months was 85

for the total group, 98

on waiting list and 72

those who were not enrolled. During 2010 there were 88 KT, 62 with cadaveric donors (CD), 18 with living donors and 8 with double pancreas-kidney transplants. Recipients of CD were 50.7 years old, with 67 months on dialysis, 8 (13

) diabetics, and 12 (20

) with previous KT. Donors had a mean age of 45 years, 28 (45

) expanded criteria, and 27.7 hours of cold ischemia time. During an approximate follow-up of 11.4 months, 13 (21

) suffered acute graft rejection, survival was 88

for graft and 93

for patients. We emphasize KT as the main cause of success as regards dialysis. No differences in risk factors were found to significantly affect graft or patient survival.

High prevalence of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis in Argentina.

BACKGROUND: There are few data in Argentina on the prevalence and management of bone and mineral metabolism (BMM) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: A survey was carried out in dialysis units in 2010 to measure the prevalence of and types of treatments for BMM disorders in Argentina. The data obtained was then compared to the published results from other large population studies. We recorded characteristics of dialysis centres and participating patients, the frequency of measurements and individual results for BMM biochemical markers, as well as the type of management used to control hyperphosphataemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism. RESULTS: 1210 patients from 25 dialysis centres in Argentina participated in the study (representing 4.7% of the country's prevalent dialysis population in 2010). The mean patient age was 55.3±17.6 years, 60.8% were male, 3.3% were on peritoneal dialysis and 29.1% suffered diabetes. In all centres, phosphataemia and calcaemia were measured on a monthly basis, 60% of centres measured intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) every 6 months, 36% every 3 to 4 months, and 4% annually. As recommended by K/DOQI, 51.6% of patients had adequate levels of calcium (8.4-9.5 mg/dl), 51.6% had adequate phosphorus (3.5-5.5 mg/dl) and 21.1% displayed acceptable iPTH levels (150-300 pg/ml). 24% had iPTH <150 pg/ml and 54.5% >300 pg/ml. iPTH ≥600 pg/ml was present in 28.3%, and 13.3% had values ≥1000 pg/ml. These figures differed from those published by the DOPPS II study, in which 51.1% of patients had iPTH <150 pg/ml, and only 26.7% had iPTH ≥300 pg/ml. Calcium-based phosphate binders were used in 83.6% of the patients, 5.6% used sevelamer and 4.0% used aluminium-containing compounds. To achieve control of hyperparathyroidism, oral or intravenous calcitriol was predominantly used (50.5%) with a small percentage of patients receiving paricalcitol or doxercalciferol. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows a high prevalence of secondary hyperparathyroidism, which differs from that published by other large population studies. There was a high proportion of patients with BMM markers outside the ranges suggested by K/DOQI. Mainly phosphate binders based on calcium and calcitriol continue to be used for the management of hyperphosphatemia and hyperparathyroidism respectively.

Elevada prevalencia de hiperparatiroidismo secundario en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica en diálisis en Argentina / High prevalence of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis in Argentina

ANTECEDENTES: Existen pocos datos acerca de la prevalencia de los trastornos del metabolismo óseo y mineral (MOM) y su forma de manejo en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica en Argentina. Objetivos y métodos: Mediante una encuesta realizada en 2010 en centros de diálisis, determinamos la prevalencia y las formas de tratamiento de los trastornos del MOM en Argentina y los comparamos con los datos publicados por otros grandes estudios poblacionales. Consignamos las características de los centros de diálisis y de los pacientes participantes, la frecuencia de las determinaciones y los resultados individuales de los marcadores bioquímicos del MOM y el tipo de manejo utilizado para controlar la hiperfosfatemia y el hiperparatiroidismo secundario. RESULTADOS: Participaron 1210 pacientes de 25 centros de diálisis de 10 provincias de Argentina (lo cual representaba el 4,7 % de la población prevalente en diálisis del país en 2010). La población estudiada tenía una edad media de 55,3 ± 17,6 años, 60,8 % eran varones, el 3,3 % en diálisis peritoneal y el 29,1 % eran diabéticos. El 100 % de los centros determinaban calcemia y fosfatemia mensualmente, el 60 % hormona paratiroidea intacta (PTHi) semestralmente, el 36 % cada 3 o 4 meses y el 4 % de forma anual. Según las recomendaciones de K/DOQI, el 51,6 % de los pacientes tenían niveles adecuados de calcio (8,4-9,5 mg/dl), el 51,6 % de fósforo (3,5-5,5 mg/dl) y el 21,1 % de PTHi (150 a 300 pg/ml). El 24,4 % tenían PTHi < 150 pg/ml y el 54,5 % > 300 pg/ml, con un 28,3 % con valores de PTHi > 600 pg/ml y un 13,3 % > 1000 pg/ml. Estos datos diferían de los publicados por el estudio DOPPS II, donde el 51,1 % de los pacientes presentaban PTHi < 150 pg/ml, y solo un 26,7 % PTHi > 300 pg/ml. El 83,6 % utilizaban un captor del fosfato basado en calcio, el 5,6 % sevelamer y el 4,0 % compuestos con aluminio. Para el control del hiperparatiroidismo se utilizaba predominantemente calcitriol oral o endovenoso (50,5 %), con un pequeño porcentaje de pacientes recibiendo paricalcitol o doxercalciferol. CONCLUSIONES: El presente estudio muestra una elevada prevalencia de hiperparatiroidismo secundario, lo cual difiere de lo publicado por otros grandes estudios poblacionales. Existe una elevada proporción de pacientes con marcadores del MOM por fuera de los niveles sugeridos por K/DOQI. Para el control de la hiperfosfatemia y el hiperparatiroidismo, se continúan utilizando mayormente captores del fosfato basados en calcio y calcitriol, respectivamente

BACKGROUND: There are few data in Argentina on the prevalence and management of bone and mineral metabolism (BMM) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Objectives and methods: A survey was carried out in dialysis units in 2010 to measure the prevalence of and types of treatments for BMM disorders in Argentina. The data obtained was then compared to the published results from other large population studies. We recorded characteristics of dialysis centres and participating patients, the frequency of measurements and individual results for BMM biochemical markers, as well as the type of management used to control hyperphosphataemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism. RESULTS: 1210 patients from 25 dialysis centres in Argentina participated in the study (representing 4.7% of the country's prevalent dialysis population in 2010). The mean patient age was 55.3±17.6 years, 60.8% were male, 3.3% were on peritoneal dialysis and 29.1% suffered diabetes. In all centres, phosphataemia and calcaemia were measured on a monthly basis, 60% of centres measured intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) every 6 months, 36% every 3 to 4 months, and 4% annually. As recommended by K/DOQI, 51.6% of patients had adequate levels of calcium (8.4-9.5mg/dl), 51.6% had adequate phosphorus (3.5-5.5mg/dl) and 21.1% displayed acceptable iPTH levels (150-300pg/ml). 24% had iPTH <150pg/ml and 54.5% >300pg/ml. iPTH >600pg/ml was present in 28.3%, and 13.3% had values >1000pg/ml. These figures differed from those published by the DOPPS II study, in which 51.1% of patients had iPTH <150pg/ml, and only 26.7% had iPTH >300pg/ml. Calcium-based phosphate binders were used in 83.6% of the patients, 5.6% used sevelamer and 4.0% used aluminium-containing compounds. To achieve control of hyperparathyroidism, oral or intravenous calcitriol was predominantly used (50.5%) with a small percentage of patients receiving paricalcitol or doxercalciferol. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows a high prevalence of secondary hyperparathyroidism, which differs from that published by other large population studies. There was a high proportion of patients with BMM markers outside the ranges suggested by K/DOQI. Mainly phosphate binders based on calcium and calcitriol continue to be used for the management of hyperphosphatemia and hyperparathyroidism respectively

Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy in post-transplant patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Persistent hyperparathyroidism is frequent in postrenal transplant patients. Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) is an alternative for treatment of patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism but it was not described in postrenal transplant patients. We report our experience with PEIT to control hyperparathyroidism in the post-transplant period. We performed PEIT under ultrasonographic guidance and local anesthesia in eight patients because of persistent secondary hyperparathyroidism after renal transplantation. Indications for PEIT were: high intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels with hypercalcemia, hypophosphatemia, osteopenia and/or bone pain. All patients had at least one visible parathyroid nodule by ultrasonography. Biochemical assays were performed immediately before PEIT, between 1 and 7 days after last PEIT, and a mean of 8.0 +/- 2.8 months after PEIT. Serum iPTH and calcium levels decreased significantly after treatment and remained unchanged until final control. Serum iPTH decreased from 286.9 +/- 107.2 to 154.6 +/- 42.2 pg/ml (P < 0.01) after PEIT (percentual reduction 36.5 +/- 9.5%). This response was significantly correlated to total ethanol volume used (r: 0.94, P < 0.0001). Hypercalcemia disappeared in six of eight patients treated. Only minor complications were registered. There were no changes in renal function related to the treatment. Our findings show that PEIT is a useful and safe alternative for patients with persistent post-transplant secondary hyperparathyroidism.