Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gynecol Obstet Invest ; 83(6): 593-599, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30007962

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective was to describe clinical findings and outcomes of patients with pudendal neuralgia in relation with the anatomical segment affected. METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive patients with chronic perineal pain (CPP) located in the areas supplied by the pudendal nerve (PN), from January 2011 to June 2012, were analyzed. RESULTS: The distribution of pain at perineal, dorsal clitoris and inferior anal nerves was 92.2, 31.4 and 25.5% respectively. The duration of pain was longer when the dorsal clitoris nerve (DCN) was affected (p < 0,003). The pain in the pudendal canal was frequently associated with the radiation of pain to the inferior members (p < 0.043). CONCLUSION: CPP and radiation of pain to lower limbs suggest a disorder at the second segment of PN. A positive Tinel sign in the third segment indicates a nerve entrapment. In terminal branches, pain was more frequent at the perineal nerve and more persistent at the DCN.


Assuntos
Medição da Dor/métodos , Dor Pélvica/etiologia , Nervo Pudendo/anatomia & histologia , Neuralgia do Pudendo/diagnóstico , Adulto , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diafragma da Pelve , Dor Pélvica/diagnóstico , Períneo/inervação , Neuralgia do Pudendo/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Surg Oncol ; 24(3): 300-4, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26116396

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The incidence, diagnosis, treatment and outcome of lymphatic ascites (LA) are studied on 85 consecutive patients with gynecologic cancer who had undergone pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy by means of laparotomy or laparoscopy. METHODS: Patients were distributed in two groups depending in the access: Laparoscopy (study group: 44 patients) and laparotomy (control group: 41 patients). All surgical parameters were collected and patients underwent ultrasound examination on postoperative days 7, 14, and 28. The main outcome measure was the development of symptomatic or asymptomatic LA. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. RESULTS: LA developed in 3 patients (6.8%) in the study group and 9 in the control group (22%), with statistical difference (p < 0.05). The relative risk to develop lymphatic ascites after surgery performed by laparotomy was 3.2 (95% CI 1.05-11.07). Mean nodes harvested during the surgery was 18.6 (SD 6.6) in the LA group and 20.4 (SD 9.1) in the group with no LA (p = 0.527). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of LA after retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer patients is lower in the patients treated by laparoscopy.


Assuntos
Ascite/etiologia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparotomia/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Espaço Retroperitoneal/cirurgia , Ascite/patologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Seguimentos , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/patologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Espaço Retroperitoneal/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...