RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The glycemic index (GI) is a measure of the ability of a food to raise glucose levels after it is eaten. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to give identical values of GI when compared to traditional methods. However, there has been no standardized protocol for measuring GI that takes into account interindividual variability and chronophysiological glycemic response to food. Our aim was (1) to create and describe software based on a Microsoft Excel 2000 spreadsheet to facilitate rapid, automated, accurate, and standardized processing of data obtained using recent CGM methodology to measure GI and its variability and (2) to assess the benefits of this new approach. METHOD: Twenty healthy subjects consumed 50 grams of glucose or four alternative foodstuffs (chocolate, apple baby food, rice squares, or yogurt) at breakfast and dinner during 1 week, resulting in 300 CGMS glucose profiles; 92% of meal tests were satisfactory for evaluation. Application and functions of the software DegifXL are described. RESULTS: Using the new spreadsheet software DegifXL, time required for data processing for the 15 data sets for each subject was reduced from 2000 to 160 minutes relative to previously used manual methods. We characterized the GI for four foodstuffs with three replicate measurements in each of 20 subjects and evaluated between person, between time period, and between replicate GI variabilities. CONCLUSION: DegifXL, combined with CGM, was an efficient and effective tool for routine measurement of group- and subject-related GI.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The sensor of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS, Medtronic Minimed, Northridge, CA) is labeled to expire 6 months following its production and to measure the glucose concentration in interstitial fluid up to 3 days after insertion. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate potential possibilities of sensors when used beyond their expiry date. METHODS: Twenty sensors, each between 3 to 18 months after the expiry date, were assessed in a 7-day period after insertion. Twenty healthy volunteers 23.4 +/- 2.92 (mean +/- SD) years old were trained in handling the CGMS and the Hypoguard (Woodbridge, UK) Advance glucometer system to measure their capillary plasma glucose concentration 18 times a day. Sensor function was estimated according to the number of readings per day, the accuracy according to the mean absolute difference (MAD), and correlation coefficient (r) between glucometer and sensor resulting from paired values. RESULTS: Uninterrupted sensor function was found in 117 of 140 sensor-days (83.6%). A reduction of readings in 23 sensor-days (16.4%) was caused by user error (5 sensor-days, 3.6%), connecting cable (7 sensor-days, 5%), sensor failure (8 sensor-days, 5.7%), or uncertain factors (3 sensor-days, 2.1%). MAD was always < 28%, and r = 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the expiry date nor the 3-day period of use limits the reliable function of a CGMS sensor. Sensors were found to function as long as 18 months after the expiry date, mostly for at least 7 days. There were no serious local adverse reactions. Prolongation of shelflife label and insertion time appears to be reasonable. Further studies are in progress.
