Radiofrequency catheter ablation of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia: long-term success and the significance of inducible nonclinical arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is effective therapy for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients without structural heart disease. In patients with postinfarction VT; however, this procedure has been used predominantly as adjunctive therapy, targeting only the patient's clinically documented arrhythmia. By targeting all inducible, sustained VT morphologies, we sought to determine the utility of RF catheter ablation as a primary cure in patients who present with hemodynamically tolerated VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: RF ablation was attempted in 35 patients with a previous myocardial infarction and recurrent, hemodynamically tolerated VT. A mean of 3.9+/-2.7 VTs were induced per patient (range, 1 to 10). The clinically documented arrhythmia was successfully ablated in 30 of 35 patients (86%), and on follow-up electrophysiological testing, 11 patients had no inducible VT and were discharged without other therapy. Nineteen patients had inducible "nonclinical" arrhythmias on follow-up testing, and the majority underwent cardiac defibrillator implantation. Freedom from recurrent arrhythmias, including sudden death, was 91% in patients without inducible VT and 53% in patients with persistently inducible "nonclinical" arrhythmias (P<.05; mean follow-up, 17+/-12 and 12+/-11 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with well-tolerated VT, RF catheter ablation may be useful as a primary cure if no other ventricular arrhythmias are inducible on follow-up testing. Ablation of all hemodynamically tolerated arrhythmias should be attempted in patients with multiple inducible VT morphologies because of the high rate of recurrence of unablated VTs in these patients.

The effects of isoproterenol on the cardiac conduction system: site-specific dose dependence.

INTRODUCTION: Isoproterenol is used to assess and facilitate AV nodal conduction, and thus potentiate the induction of supraventricular arrhythmias. It is commonly administered in increasing doses until a predetermined decrease in sinus cycle length, usually 20% to 30%, occurs. This regimen may result in undesirable side effects. We have observed that effects of isoproterenol on the AV node may occur prior to achieving the target sinus cycle length. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the sinus and AV nodes have equal sensitivity to isoproterenol. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients, who underwent electrophysiologic evaluation for a variety of indications, were given incremental doses of isoproterenol at 0.007, 0.014, 0.021, and 0.028 microgram/kg per minute. Sinus cycle length and AV node function were assessed at baseline and after 5 minutes at each dose. The percent change from baseline in AV node function was compared with the change in sinus cycle length at each dose interval. Significantly greater decreases were observed in the anterograde and retrograde AV nodal Wenckebach cycle length (P < 0.0001) than in the sinus cycle length at the lowest isoproterenol dose (0.007 microgram/kg per min). These differences were not apparent at higher doses. A sustained supraventricular tachycardia was inducible in 15 of 38 patients in the presence of isoproterenol, of which 40% occurred at the lowest dose. CONCLUSIONS: The AV node is more sensitive than the sinus node to the effects of isoproterenol. Lower doses of isoproterenol than those commonly used may often facilitate the induction of a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, thus reducing side effects.

Primary ablation of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation.

Direct treatment of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation--that is, attempting to prevent arrhythmia recurrences by ablating atrial tissue--has been a challenge because of uncertainty about the location of optimal target tissues as well as the amount of atrial tissue requiring destruction to effect cure. Advances have yielded success rates for ablation of the common form of atrial flutter comparable to those for other types of supraventricular tachycardia and provide reason for optimism about the use of catheter techniques, to treat atrial fibrillation definitively. This article discusses some of these advances as well as the current status of catheter ablation for atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation and, finally, what the future may bring.