Impact of C3 Involvement on Postoperative Kyphosis Following Cervical Laminoplasty: A Comparison Between High and Low T1 Slope.

BACKGROUND: The goal of the present study was to investigate the impact of C3 involvement on the postoperative kyphosis following cervical laminoplasty in patients with high and low T1S. METHODS: The data from ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament patients who had undergone laminoplasty between January 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into low-and high-T1S groups according to preoperative T1S, and the postoperative alignment change was compared between the groups. The relationships between postoperative cervical kyphosis and preoperative variables, including gender, C3 laminoplasty, T1S, cervical lordosis (CL), C2-7 Sagittal Vertical Axis, and T1S minus CL (T1S-CL) were investigated. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were divided into 2 groups above and below median preoperative T1S (23.70). There were thirty-three patients (38.3%) in low-T1S group and fifty-three patients (61.7%) in high-T1S group. Twenty-three patients (26.7%) were performed with C3 involved laminoplasty. C3 laminoplasty (odds ratio [OR], 9.67; 2.82-33.16; P = 0.000), high T1S (OR, 4.89; 1.54-15.49; P = 0.007), and mismatched T1S-CL (OR, 5.96; 1.83-19.43; P = 0.003) were significantly associated with postoperative kyphosis. In high-T1S group, the loss of CL was significant (P = 0.017) when C3 laminoplasty was performed, whereas, in low-T1S group, the C3 laminoplasty did not show the statistically significant difference. (P = 0.194). CONCLUSIONS: C3 laminoplasty, mismatched T1S-CL, and high T1S were found to increase the risk of postoperative kyphosis following cervical laminoplasty. Patients with high T1 slope tended to exhibit a greater loss of CL when the laminoplasty was performed extending to C3 segment.

Restoration of lumbopelvic sagittal alignment and its maintenance following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): comparison between straight type versus curvilinear type cage.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a radiological and clinical difference between the curvilinear type cages compared to the straight type cages for the restoration of lumbopelvic sagittal alignment and its maintenance after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure. METHODS: 68 patients who underwent single-level TLIF using either the straight type or curvilinear type cage were retrospectively reviewed. Assessment of the lumbopelvic parameters and the height of disc space was performed before surgery as well as 2 days, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Clinical outcome was assessed using VAS and ODI. RESULTS: The curvilinear type cages were positioned more anteriorly than the straight type. Restoration of the segmental lordosis (SL) in the curvilinear group was significantly greater than the straight group and at 12 months of follow-up, the straight group showed greater decrease in the disc height than the curvilinear group. The straight group failed to show improvement of lumbar lordosis (LL), while the curvilinear group showed significant restoration of LL and could maintain it to the 6 months of follow-up. In both groups, pelvic tilt was significantly decreased and it lasted to 6 months in the straight group; whereas in the curvilinear group, it was maintained to the last follow-up of 12 months. There were no significant differences between the two groups in mean VAS and ODI score over the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the curvilinear type cage is superior to the straight type cage in improving the SL and maintaining both the restored lumbopelvic parameters and elevated disc height. These results could be attributable to the anterior position of the curvilinear cage which permits easy restoration of segmental lordosis and less sinking of cages.