Attainment of normal lipid levels among patients on lipid-modifying therapy in Hong Kong.

INTRODUCTION: Although low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary lipid target for coronary heart disease (CHD) risk reduction, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) have also emerged as CHD risk factors. The objective of this study was to evaluate attainment of lipid goals and normal levels following lipid-modifying therapy (LMT) and its predictors in a representative sample of Chinese patients from Hong Kong. METHODS: Using longitudinal data collected from patient medical records, the study identified 706 patients who initiated LMT from January 2004 to December 2006 and had full lipid panels 12 months before and after therapy. LDL-C goals and normal levels of HDL-C and TG were defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel 3 guidelines. Patients with previous CHD, diabetes, and 10-year CHD risk > 20% were classified as high risk. Multiple logistic regressions evaluated predictors of normal lipid-level attainment. RESULTS: Among 706 patients (mean age 64.6 years, 58.6% male), 71.7% had elevated LDL-C, 32.4% had low HDL-C, and 24.9% had elevated TG before LMT. Despite therapy (91.2% statins only), 22.7% had elevated LDL-C, 31.9% had low HDL-C, 12.3% had elevated TG, and 13.9% had multiple abnormal lipid levels. The strongest predictors of attaining ≥ 2 normal lipid levels included male gender (odds ratio [OR]: 2.11 [1.12 to 4.01]), diabetes (OR: 0.43 [0.23 to 0.78]), obesity (OR: 0.91 [0.86 to 0.97]), and CHD risk > 20% (OR: 0.33 [0.15 to 0.71]). CONCLUSIONS: Current approaches to lipid management in Hong Kong, primarily using statins, considerably improve attainment of LDL-C goal. However, a large proportion of patients do not achieve normal HDL-C levels and control of multiple lipid parameters remains poor. Patients could benefit from a more comprehensive approach to lipid management that treats all three lipid risk factors, as suggested in clinical guidelines.

Long-term outcomes of inducible very fast ventricular tachycardia (cycle length 200-250 ms) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcomes of patients with inducible very fast ventricular tachycardia (VFVT) of cycle length (CL) 200 to 250 ms have not been well studied. METHODS: Consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 320 ms). The primary endpoint was spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia or sudden death. RESULTS: The mean age was 63 +/- 12 years and mean LVEF was 29 +/- 7%. At mean follow-up of 38 +/- 25 months (median 30 months), the primary endpoint rate was 6.6%, 34%, 44%, and 71% in groups A, B C, and D, respectively (P < 0.001). Neither mode of induction of VT nor LVEF altered the observed pattern in the primary endpoint. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint among implanted cardioverter defibrillator recipients in groups B and C (38% vs 45%, P = 0.43). Adjusted hazard ratios for the primary endpoint compared to group A were 3.2, 3.5, and 7.0 in groups B, C, and D, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Inducible VFVT (200-250 ms) is a clinically significant arrhythmia with adverse long-term outcomes and should not be considered a nonspecific finding of PVS.